Message ID | 87y4ebyznc.fsf@saruman.tx.rr.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Hi, Belisko Marek <marek.belisko@gmail.com> writes: > Hi, > > On Fri, Nov 6, 2015 at 3:24 PM, Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> wrote: >> >> Hi again, >> >> Felipe Balbi <balbi@ti.com> writes: >>> Hi Marek, >>> >>> your commit af19161aaed7 ("ARM: dts: twl4030: Add iio properties for bci >>> subnode") breaks build on current linus/master (which current sits in >> >> this commit cannot be found in next. How come it's in linus/master ? > I did post fix but Tony seems doesn't merge it: > https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/10/13/816 looking at that thread, I have no idea how come the old version was merged in the first place. Tony was clear that it broke build and yet this patch has made its way to mainline and it didn't even go through linux-next, which makes the problem worse. Now we have a bisection point where the tree (well, some DTS files) won't even build. This is quite messy. -- balbi
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl4030.dtsi b/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl4030.dtsi index 482b7aa37808..c8197f209efc 100644 --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl4030.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/twl4030.dtsi @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ charger: bci { compatible = "ti,twl4030-bci"; interrupts = <9>, <2>; - io-channels = <&twl4030_madc 11>; + io-channels = <&twl_madc 11>; io-channel-name = "vac"; bci3v1-supply = <&vusb3v1>; };