@@ -285,12 +285,12 @@ static int __init arm64_enable_runtime_services(void)
if (!efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT)) {
pr_info("EFI services will not be available.\n");
- return -1;
+ return 0;
}
if (efi_runtime_disabled()) {
pr_info("EFI runtime services will be disabled.\n");
- return -1;
+ return 0;
}
pr_info("Remapping and enabling EFI services.\n");
@@ -300,7 +300,7 @@ static int __init arm64_enable_runtime_services(void)
mapsize);
if (!memmap.map) {
pr_err("Failed to remap EFI memory map\n");
- return -1;
+ return -ENOMEM;
}
memmap.map_end = memmap.map + mapsize;
efi.memmap = &memmap;
@@ -309,13 +309,13 @@ static int __init arm64_enable_runtime_services(void)
sizeof(efi_system_table_t));
if (!efi.systab) {
pr_err("Failed to remap EFI System Table\n");
- return -1;
+ return -ENOMEM;
}
set_bit(EFI_SYSTEM_TABLES, &efi.flags);
if (!efi_virtmap_init()) {
pr_err("No UEFI virtual mapping was installed -- runtime services will not be available\n");
- return -1;
+ return -ENOMEM;
}
/* Set up runtime services function pointers */
Even though initcall return values are typically ignored, the prototype is to return 0 on success or a negative errno value on error. So fix the arm_enable_runtime_services() implementation to return 0 on conditions that are not in fact errors, and return a meaningful error code otherwise. Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> --- arch/arm64/kernel/efi.c | 10 +++++----- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) -- 1.9.1 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel