Message ID | 20220906151303.2780789-6-benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | f9b348185f4d684cc19e6bd9b87904823d5aa5ed |
Headers | show |
Series | bpf-core changes for preparation of | expand |
On Tue, 6 Sept 2022 at 17:13, Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> wrote: > > net/bpf/test_run.c is already presenting 20 kfuncs. > net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c is also presenting an extra 10 kfuncs. > > Given that all the kfuncs are regrouped into one unique set, having > only 2 space left prevent us to add more selftests. > > Bump it to 64 for now. > > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> > > --- I can imagine pinning this down as the reason the program was failing to load must have been fun, since I ended up requiring this too in the linked list series... Acked-by: Kumar Kartikeya Dwivedi <memxor@gmail.com> > > no changes in v11 > > new in v10 > --- > kernel/bpf/btf.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c > index eca9ea78ee5f..8280c1a8dbce 100644 > --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c > +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c > @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ enum btf_kfunc_hook { > }; > > enum { > - BTF_KFUNC_SET_MAX_CNT = 32, > + BTF_KFUNC_SET_MAX_CNT = 64, > BTF_DTOR_KFUNC_MAX_CNT = 256, > }; > > -- > 2.36.1 >
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/btf.c b/kernel/bpf/btf.c index eca9ea78ee5f..8280c1a8dbce 100644 --- a/kernel/bpf/btf.c +++ b/kernel/bpf/btf.c @@ -208,7 +208,7 @@ enum btf_kfunc_hook { }; enum { - BTF_KFUNC_SET_MAX_CNT = 32, + BTF_KFUNC_SET_MAX_CNT = 64, BTF_DTOR_KFUNC_MAX_CNT = 256, };
net/bpf/test_run.c is already presenting 20 kfuncs. net/netfilter/nf_conntrack_bpf.c is also presenting an extra 10 kfuncs. Given that all the kfuncs are regrouped into one unique set, having only 2 space left prevent us to add more selftests. Bump it to 64 for now. Signed-off-by: Benjamin Tissoires <benjamin.tissoires@redhat.com> --- no changes in v11 new in v10 --- kernel/bpf/btf.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)