Message ID | 20220914095628.26093-3-pshete@nvidia.com |
---|---|
State | Superseded |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2,1/4] mmc: sdhci-tegra: Separate T19x and T23x SoC data | expand |
On 14/09/22 15:20, Thierry Reding wrote: > On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 03:26:27PM +0530, Prathamesh Shete wrote: >> In case of error condition to avoid system crash >> Tegra SDMMC controller requires CMD and DAT resets >> issued together. > > It might be worth specifying exactly what "system crash" means. Does > this always happen (i.e. do we have a problem right now?) or are there > specific circumstances that cause the crash. > >> This is applicable to Tegra186 and later chips. >> >> Signed-off-by: Aniruddha TVS Rao <anrao@nvidia.com> >> Signed-off-by: Prathamesh Shete <pshete@nvidia.com> >> --- >> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 3 ++- >> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 11 ++++++++--- >> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h | 2 ++ >> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c >> index b66b0cc51497..7d16dc41fe91 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c >> @@ -1530,7 +1530,8 @@ static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_tegra186_pdata = { >> SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_HISPD_BIT | >> SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_ADMA_ZEROLEN_DESC | >> SDHCI_QUIRK_CAP_CLOCK_BASE_BROKEN, >> - .quirks2 = SDHCI_QUIRK2_PRESET_VALUE_BROKEN, >> + .quirks2 = SDHCI_QUIRK2_PRESET_VALUE_BROKEN | >> + SDHCI_QUIRK2_ISSUE_CMD_DAT_RESET_TOGETHER, >> .ops = &tegra186_sdhci_ops, >> }; >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c >> index 7689ffec5ad1..289fa8ae4866 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c >> @@ -3063,9 +3063,14 @@ static bool sdhci_request_done(struct sdhci_host *host) >> * Spec says we should do both at the same time, but Ricoh >> * controllers do not like that. >> */ > > The comment above seems to indicate that the current behavior (i.e. > splitting the CMD and DATA resets) is actually the quirk, so I wonder if > this perhaps should be reversed? I suppose it could be difficult to > track down the exact controllers that need the separate resets, but this > might be worth doing. It's possible that other controllers might run > into the same issue that we are if they work strictly to the spec. > > Adrian, any ideas on how much of this is just cargo-culted? Do we play > it safe and do the "double workaround" or do we want to attempt to > rectify this by adding a Ricoh-specific quirk? It is a good question, but it has been that way for a very long time, and the spec tends to document them separately anyway, so it doesn't seem there is much reason to change. > > Thierry > >> - sdhci_do_reset(host, SDHCI_RESET_CMD); >> - sdhci_do_reset(host, SDHCI_RESET_DATA); >> - >> + if (host->quirks2 & >> + SDHCI_QUIRK2_ISSUE_CMD_DAT_RESET_TOGETHER) { >> + sdhci_do_reset(host, SDHCI_RESET_CMD | >> + SDHCI_RESET_DATA); >> + } else { >> + sdhci_do_reset(host, SDHCI_RESET_CMD); >> + sdhci_do_reset(host, SDHCI_RESET_DATA); >> + } >> host->pending_reset = false; >> } >> >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h >> index 95a08f09df30..8045308f7859 100644 >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h >> @@ -480,6 +480,8 @@ struct sdhci_host { >> * block count. >> */ >> #define SDHCI_QUIRK2_USE_32BIT_BLK_CNT (1<<18) >> +/* Issue CMD and DATA reset together */ >> +#define SDHCI_QUIRK2_ISSUE_CMD_DAT_RESET_TOGETHER (1<<19) >> >> int irq; /* Device IRQ */ >> void __iomem *ioaddr; /* Mapped address */ >> -- >> 2.17.1 >>
On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 09:21:07PM +0300, Adrian Hunter wrote: > On 14/09/22 15:20, Thierry Reding wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 14, 2022 at 03:26:27PM +0530, Prathamesh Shete wrote: > >> In case of error condition to avoid system crash > >> Tegra SDMMC controller requires CMD and DAT resets > >> issued together. > > > > It might be worth specifying exactly what "system crash" means. Does > > this always happen (i.e. do we have a problem right now?) or are there > > specific circumstances that cause the crash. > > > >> This is applicable to Tegra186 and later chips. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Aniruddha TVS Rao <anrao@nvidia.com> > >> Signed-off-by: Prathamesh Shete <pshete@nvidia.com> > >> --- > >> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c | 3 ++- > >> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c | 11 ++++++++--- > >> drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h | 2 ++ > >> 3 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c > >> index b66b0cc51497..7d16dc41fe91 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c > >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c > >> @@ -1530,7 +1530,8 @@ static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_tegra186_pdata = { > >> SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_HISPD_BIT | > >> SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_ADMA_ZEROLEN_DESC | > >> SDHCI_QUIRK_CAP_CLOCK_BASE_BROKEN, > >> - .quirks2 = SDHCI_QUIRK2_PRESET_VALUE_BROKEN, > >> + .quirks2 = SDHCI_QUIRK2_PRESET_VALUE_BROKEN | > >> + SDHCI_QUIRK2_ISSUE_CMD_DAT_RESET_TOGETHER, > >> .ops = &tegra186_sdhci_ops, > >> }; > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c > >> index 7689ffec5ad1..289fa8ae4866 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c > >> +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c > >> @@ -3063,9 +3063,14 @@ static bool sdhci_request_done(struct sdhci_host *host) > >> * Spec says we should do both at the same time, but Ricoh > >> * controllers do not like that. > >> */ > > > > The comment above seems to indicate that the current behavior (i.e. > > splitting the CMD and DATA resets) is actually the quirk, so I wonder if > > this perhaps should be reversed? I suppose it could be difficult to > > track down the exact controllers that need the separate resets, but this > > might be worth doing. It's possible that other controllers might run > > into the same issue that we are if they work strictly to the spec. > > > > Adrian, any ideas on how much of this is just cargo-culted? Do we play > > it safe and do the "double workaround" or do we want to attempt to > > rectify this by adding a Ricoh-specific quirk? > > It is a good question, but it has been that way for a very long time, > and the spec tends to document them separately anyway, so it doesn't > seem there is much reason to change. Fair enough. Prathamesh, perhaps revise the comment above as part of this patch because with the change below it now sounds a bit confusing. Thierry
diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c index b66b0cc51497..7d16dc41fe91 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci-tegra.c @@ -1530,7 +1530,8 @@ static const struct sdhci_pltfm_data sdhci_tegra186_pdata = { SDHCI_QUIRK_NO_HISPD_BIT | SDHCI_QUIRK_BROKEN_ADMA_ZEROLEN_DESC | SDHCI_QUIRK_CAP_CLOCK_BASE_BROKEN, - .quirks2 = SDHCI_QUIRK2_PRESET_VALUE_BROKEN, + .quirks2 = SDHCI_QUIRK2_PRESET_VALUE_BROKEN | + SDHCI_QUIRK2_ISSUE_CMD_DAT_RESET_TOGETHER, .ops = &tegra186_sdhci_ops, }; diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c index 7689ffec5ad1..289fa8ae4866 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.c @@ -3063,9 +3063,14 @@ static bool sdhci_request_done(struct sdhci_host *host) * Spec says we should do both at the same time, but Ricoh * controllers do not like that. */ - sdhci_do_reset(host, SDHCI_RESET_CMD); - sdhci_do_reset(host, SDHCI_RESET_DATA); - + if (host->quirks2 & + SDHCI_QUIRK2_ISSUE_CMD_DAT_RESET_TOGETHER) { + sdhci_do_reset(host, SDHCI_RESET_CMD | + SDHCI_RESET_DATA); + } else { + sdhci_do_reset(host, SDHCI_RESET_CMD); + sdhci_do_reset(host, SDHCI_RESET_DATA); + } host->pending_reset = false; } diff --git a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h index 95a08f09df30..8045308f7859 100644 --- a/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h +++ b/drivers/mmc/host/sdhci.h @@ -480,6 +480,8 @@ struct sdhci_host { * block count. */ #define SDHCI_QUIRK2_USE_32BIT_BLK_CNT (1<<18) +/* Issue CMD and DATA reset together */ +#define SDHCI_QUIRK2_ISSUE_CMD_DAT_RESET_TOGETHER (1<<19) int irq; /* Device IRQ */ void __iomem *ioaddr; /* Mapped address */