@@ -44,12 +44,11 @@ module_param_named(boot_enable, boot_enable, int, S_IRUGO);
static int etm4_count;
static struct etmv4_drvdata *etmdrvdata[NR_CPUS];
-static void etm4_os_unlock(void *info)
+static void etm4_os_unlock(struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata)
{
- struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata = (struct etmv4_drvdata *)info;
-
/* Writing any value to ETMOSLAR unlocks the trace registers */
writel_relaxed(0x0, drvdata->base + TRCOSLAR);
+ drvdata->os_unlock = true;
isb();
}
@@ -286,6 +285,9 @@ static void etm4_init_arch_data(void *info)
u32 etmidr5;
struct etmv4_drvdata *drvdata = info;
+ /* Make sure all registers are accessible */
+ etm4_os_unlock(drvdata);
+
CS_UNLOCK(drvdata->base);
/* find all capabilities of the tracing unit */
@@ -603,9 +605,6 @@ static int etm4_probe(struct amba_device *adev, const struct amba_id *id)
get_online_cpus();
etmdrvdata[drvdata->cpu] = drvdata;
- if (!smp_call_function_single(drvdata->cpu, etm4_os_unlock, drvdata, 1))
- drvdata->os_unlock = true;
-
if (smp_call_function_single(drvdata->cpu,
etm4_init_arch_data, drvdata, 1))
dev_err(dev, "ETM arch init failed\n");
As with the ETMv3.x driver, calling 'smp_call_function_single()' twice in a row is highly ineffective. As such moving function 'etm4_os_unlock()' before the default initialisation takes place, which results in the same outcome. Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> --- drivers/hwtracing/coresight/coresight-etm4x.c | 11 +++++------ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) -- 2.1.4 _______________________________________________ linux-arm-kernel mailing list linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-arm-kernel