| Message ID | 1462981062-24909-5-git-send-email-sudeep.holla@arm.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
On 13/06/16 05:47, Sajjan, Vikas C wrote: > Hi Sudeep, > [...] > --- a/drivers/firmware/psci.c > +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci.c > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ > > #define pr_fmt(fmt) "psci: " fmt > > +#include <linux/acpi.h> > #include <linux/arm-smccc.h> > #include <linux/cpuidle.h> > #include <linux/errno.h> > @@ -310,11 +311,66 @@ static int psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu) > return ret; > } > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > +#include <acpi/processor.h> > + > +static int __maybe_unused psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu) { > + int i, count; > + u32 *psci_states; > + struct acpi_processor *pr; > + struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi; > + > + pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu); > + if (unlikely(!pr || !pr->flags.has_lpi)) > > Any particular reason for _not_ considering CST flag here. > Or you are planning to add CST support in some other patch set. > Are you referring the old C-state objects ? We don't support them on ARM64. Only LPIs are support. The ARM FFH is not defined for CST, only for LPIs. -- Regards, Sudeep -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 01:50:28PM +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote: > [+ Daniel, Kevin] > > On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 04:37:41PM +0100, Sudeep Holla wrote: > > This patch adds appropriate callbacks to support ACPI Low Power Idle > > (LPI) on ARM64. > > > > Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> > > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> > > --- [ ... ] > > +#define ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_CORE_CONTEXT BIT(0) > > +#define ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_TRACE_CONTEXT BIT(1) > > +#define ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_GICR_CONTEXT BIT(2) > > +#define ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_GICD_CONTEXT BIT(3) > > +#define ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_ALL_CONTEXT \ > > + (ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_CORE_CONTEXT | \ > > + ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_TRACE_CONTEXT | \ > > + ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_GICR_CONTEXT | \ > > + ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_GICD_CONTEXT) > > + > > +struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi; > > +int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi, int idx) > > +{ > > + int ret = 0; > > + bool save_ctx = lpi->arch_flags & ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_ALL_CONTEXT; > > I am not really that keen on this, as you know. Those flags are > there to say "save these components registers". I see the CPU PM > notifiers as a way to save/restore CPU peripheral state, but > they should *not* carry out any action that affects the power > state itself, that's down to the suspend finisher (eg PSCI), > because that's where the specific idle states are managed. > > I agree we have no clue whatsoever on what we *really* need > to save/restore, but that's orthogonal to what you are solving > here. > > See eg gic_cpu_if_down(). Do we call it from the GIC CPU PM notifier ? > No. We should not handle the same problem differently. > > On top of that, we have no way to solve this problem for DT, > all I am saying is that it is ill-defined and given that LPI > is new I'd rather we got it right from the beginning. > > I am open to suggestions here. There is a part of the idle state flags integer which is reserved for the arch specific flag and can be masked with: CPUIDLE_DRIVER_FLAGS_MASK() May be these context flags can be added in the generic cpuidle driver and reused. Concerning the DT, why not use the power domains to tell which context to save ? yeah, probably mentionned n-th times :) > > + > > + if (!idx) { > > + cpu_do_idle(); > > + return idx; > > + } > > + > > + /* TODO cpu_pm_{enter,exit} can be done in generic code ? */ > > + if (save_ctx) > > + ret = cpu_pm_enter(); > > + if (!ret) { > > + /* > > + * Pass idle state index to cpu_suspend which in turn will > > + * call the CPU ops suspend protocol with idle index as a > > + * parameter. > > + */ > > + ret = arm_cpuidle_suspend(idx); > > + > > + if (save_ctx) > > + cpu_pm_exit(); > > + } > > + > > + return ret ? -1 : idx; > > The body of this function (if we remove save_ctx) is identical > to arm_enter_idle_state(), it would be nice if we found a way > where to put this code and share it with the ARM CPUidle driver, +1 We don't want to redo another unmaintable acpi idle driver. -- Daniel -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c index d1ce8e2f98b9..bf82ce5c8fce 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c +++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c @@ -18,6 +18,7 @@ #include <linux/acpi.h> #include <linux/bootmem.h> #include <linux/cpumask.h> +#include <linux/cpu_pm.h> #include <linux/init.h> #include <linux/irq.h> #include <linux/irqdomain.h> @@ -25,6 +26,9 @@ #include <linux/of_fdt.h> #include <linux/smp.h> +#include <acpi/processor.h> + +#include <asm/cpuidle.h> #include <asm/cputype.h> #include <asm/cpu_ops.h> #include <asm/smp_plat.h> @@ -211,6 +215,50 @@ void __init acpi_boot_table_init(void) } } +int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_probe(unsigned int cpu) +{ + return arm_cpuidle_init(cpu); +} + +#define ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_CORE_CONTEXT BIT(0) +#define ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_TRACE_CONTEXT BIT(1) +#define ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_GICR_CONTEXT BIT(2) +#define ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_GICD_CONTEXT BIT(3) +#define ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_ALL_CONTEXT \ + (ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_CORE_CONTEXT | \ + ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_TRACE_CONTEXT | \ + ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_GICR_CONTEXT | \ + ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_GICD_CONTEXT) + +struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi; +int acpi_processor_ffh_lpi_enter(struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi, int idx) +{ + int ret = 0; + bool save_ctx = lpi->arch_flags & ACPI_FFH_LPI_ARM_FLAGS_ALL_CONTEXT; + + if (!idx) { + cpu_do_idle(); + return idx; + } + + /* TODO cpu_pm_{enter,exit} can be done in generic code ? */ + if (save_ctx) + ret = cpu_pm_enter(); + if (!ret) { + /* + * Pass idle state index to cpu_suspend which in turn will + * call the CPU ops suspend protocol with idle index as a + * parameter. + */ + ret = arm_cpuidle_suspend(idx); + + if (save_ctx) + cpu_pm_exit(); + } + + return ret ? -1 : idx; +} + #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI_APEI pgprot_t arch_apei_get_mem_attribute(phys_addr_t addr) { diff --git a/drivers/firmware/psci.c b/drivers/firmware/psci.c index fa4ea22ca12e..e06bfee68e1d 100644 --- a/drivers/firmware/psci.c +++ b/drivers/firmware/psci.c @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@ #define pr_fmt(fmt) "psci: " fmt +#include <linux/acpi.h> #include <linux/arm-smccc.h> #include <linux/cpuidle.h> #include <linux/errno.h> @@ -310,11 +311,66 @@ static int psci_dt_cpu_init_idle(struct device_node *cpu_node, int cpu) return ret; } +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI +#include <acpi/processor.h> + +static int __maybe_unused psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu) +{ + int i, count; + u32 *psci_states; + struct acpi_processor *pr; + struct acpi_lpi_state *lpi; + + pr = per_cpu(processors, cpu); + if (unlikely(!pr || !pr->flags.has_lpi)) + return -EINVAL; + + /* + * If the PSCI cpu_suspend function hook has not been initialized + * idle states must not be enabled, so bail out + */ + if (!psci_ops.cpu_suspend) + return -EOPNOTSUPP; + + count = pr->power.count - 1; + if (!count) + return -ENODEV; + + psci_states = kcalloc(count, sizeof(*psci_states), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!psci_states) + return -ENOMEM; + + for (i = 0; i < count; i++) { + u32 state; + + lpi = &pr->power.lpi_states[i + 1]; + state = lpi->address & 0xFFFFFFFF; + if (!psci_power_state_is_valid(state)) { + pr_warn("Invalid PSCI power state %#x\n", state); + kfree(psci_states); + return -EINVAL; + } + psci_states[i] = state; + } + /* Idle states parsed correctly, initialize per-cpu pointer */ + per_cpu(psci_power_state, cpu) = psci_states; + return 0; +} +#else +static int __maybe_unused psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu) +{ + return -EINVAL; +} +#endif + int psci_cpu_init_idle(unsigned int cpu) { struct device_node *cpu_node; int ret; + if (!acpi_disabled) + return psci_acpi_cpu_init_idle(cpu); + cpu_node = of_get_cpu_node(cpu, NULL); if (!cpu_node) return -ENODEV;
This patch adds appropriate callbacks to support ACPI Low Power Idle (LPI) on ARM64. Cc: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com> Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> --- arch/arm64/kernel/acpi.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/firmware/psci.c | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 104 insertions(+) -- 1.9.1 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-acpi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html