@@ -872,7 +872,7 @@ int pinmux_generic_add_function(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
void *data)
{
struct function_desc *function;
- int selector;
+ int selector, error;
if (!name)
return -EINVAL;
@@ -892,7 +892,9 @@ int pinmux_generic_add_function(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev,
function->num_group_names = num_groups;
function->data = data;
- radix_tree_insert(&pctldev->pin_function_tree, selector, function);
+ error = radix_tree_insert(&pctldev->pin_function_tree, selector, function);
+ if (error)
+ return error;
pctldev->num_functions++;
pinctrl_generic_add_function() doesn't check result of radix_tree_insert() despite they both may return a negative error code. Linus Walleij said he has copied the radix tree code from kernel/irq/ where the functions calling radix_tree_insert() are *void* themselves; I think it makes more sense to propagate the errors from radix_tree_insert() upstream if we can do that... Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with the Svace static analysis tool. Signed-off-by: Sergey Shtylyov <s.shtylyov@omp.ru> --- drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)