Message ID | 20230725143023.86325-8-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | i2c: designware: code consolidation & cleanups | expand |
Hi Andy, On Tue, Jul 25, 2023 at 05:30:21PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote: > Instead of asymmetrical checks for the firmware use is_*_node() > calls. With that, drop now local wrappers against > > Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> > --- > drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c | 23 +++++++--------------- > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c > index 443426474cfc..e6df6a484955 100644 > --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c > +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c > @@ -241,15 +241,9 @@ static void i2c_dw_of_do_configure(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, struct device *device > } > } > > -static void i2c_dw_of_configure(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) > -{ > - if (dev_of_node(dev->dev)) > - i2c_dw_of_do_configure(dev, dev->dev); > -} > - I have to partially agree with Jarkko here, the patch splitting of this series is a bit too exotic. Series need to be understood by reading them forward, not backward. Oversplitting sometimes might even reduce readability and "reviewability" (can I say so?). And this function, in seven patches, has been added, moved and removed, and I had to read the series twice :) Anyway, I won't ask you to refactor the whole series, I understand your logic. Reviewed-by: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@kernel.org> Andi
diff --git a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c index 443426474cfc..e6df6a484955 100644 --- a/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c +++ b/drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c @@ -241,15 +241,9 @@ static void i2c_dw_of_do_configure(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, struct device *device } } -static void i2c_dw_of_configure(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) -{ - if (dev_of_node(dev->dev)) - i2c_dw_of_do_configure(dev, dev->dev); -} - #else /* CONFIG_OF */ -static inline void i2c_dw_of_configure(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) { } +static inline void i2c_dw_of_do_configure(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, struct device *device) { } #endif /* CONFIG_OF */ @@ -329,12 +323,6 @@ static void i2c_dw_acpi_do_configure(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, struct device *devi } } -static void i2c_dw_acpi_configure(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) -{ - if (has_acpi_companion(dev->dev)) - i2c_dw_acpi_do_configure(dev, dev->dev); -} - static u32 i2c_dw_acpi_round_bus_speed(struct device *device) { u32 acpi_speed; @@ -355,7 +343,7 @@ static u32 i2c_dw_acpi_round_bus_speed(struct device *device) #else /* CONFIG_ACPI */ -static inline void i2c_dw_acpi_configure(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) { } +static inline void i2c_dw_acpi_do_configure(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev, struct device *device) { } static inline u32 i2c_dw_acpi_round_bus_speed(struct device *device) { return 0; } @@ -380,14 +368,17 @@ static void i2c_dw_adjust_bus_speed(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) int i2c_dw_fw_parse_and_configure(struct dw_i2c_dev *dev) { + struct fwnode_handle *fwnode = dev_fwnode(dev->dev); struct i2c_timings *t = &dev->timings; i2c_parse_fw_timings(dev->dev, t, false); i2c_dw_adjust_bus_speed(dev); - i2c_dw_of_configure(dev); - i2c_dw_acpi_configure(dev); + if (is_of_node(fwnode)) + i2c_dw_of_do_configure(dev, dev->dev); + else if (is_acpi_node(fwnode)) + i2c_dw_acpi_do_configure(dev, dev->dev); return i2c_dw_validate_speed(dev); }
Instead of asymmetrical checks for the firmware use is_*_node() calls. With that, drop now local wrappers against Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com> --- drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-common.c | 23 +++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)