Message ID | 20230905-5-15-of-kexec-modpost-warning-v1-1-4138b2e96b4e@kernel.org |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [5.15] of: kexec: Mark ima_{free,stable}_kexec_buffer() as __init | expand |
On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 03:28:51PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Tue, 05 Sep 2023 13:36:11 -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > > This commit has no direct upstream equivalent. > > > > After commit d48016d74836 ("mm,ima,kexec,of: use memblock_free_late from > > ima_free_kexec_buffer") in 5.15, there is a modpost warning for certain > > configurations: > > > > WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text+0xb14064): Section mismatch in reference from the function ima_free_kexec_buffer() to the function .init.text:__memblock_free_late() > > The function ima_free_kexec_buffer() references > > the function __init __memblock_free_late(). > > This is often because ima_free_kexec_buffer lacks a __init > > annotation or the annotation of __memblock_free_late is wrong. > > > > In mainline, there is no issue because ima_free_kexec_buffer() is marked > > as __init, which was done as part of commit b69a2afd5afc ("x86/kexec: > > Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec") in 6.0, which is not > > suitable for stable. > > > > Mark ima_free_kexec_buffer() and its single caller > > ima_load_kexec_buffer() as __init in 5.15, as ima_load_kexec_buffer() is > > only called from ima_init(), which is __init, clearing up the warning. > > > > Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> > > --- > > drivers/of/kexec.c | 2 +- > > include/linux/of.h | 2 +- > > security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 2 +- > > security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 2 +- > > 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > Acked-by: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org> > Now queued up, thanks. greg k-h
diff --git a/drivers/of/kexec.c b/drivers/of/kexec.c index 3a07cc58e7d7..d10fd54415c2 100644 --- a/drivers/of/kexec.c +++ b/drivers/of/kexec.c @@ -165,7 +165,7 @@ int ima_get_kexec_buffer(void **addr, size_t *size) /** * ima_free_kexec_buffer - free memory used by the IMA buffer */ -int ima_free_kexec_buffer(void) +int __init ima_free_kexec_buffer(void) { int ret; unsigned long addr; diff --git a/include/linux/of.h b/include/linux/of.h index 140671cb746a..6f15e8b0f9d1 100644 --- a/include/linux/of.h +++ b/include/linux/of.h @@ -574,7 +574,7 @@ void *of_kexec_alloc_and_setup_fdt(const struct kimage *image, unsigned long initrd_len, const char *cmdline, size_t extra_fdt_size); int ima_get_kexec_buffer(void **addr, size_t *size); -int ima_free_kexec_buffer(void); +int __init ima_free_kexec_buffer(void); #else /* CONFIG_OF */ static inline void of_core_init(void) diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h index be965a8715e4..0afe413dda68 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima.h +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima.h @@ -122,7 +122,7 @@ struct ima_kexec_hdr { extern const int read_idmap[]; #ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC -void ima_load_kexec_buffer(void); +void __init ima_load_kexec_buffer(void); #else static inline void ima_load_kexec_buffer(void) {} #endif /* CONFIG_HAVE_IMA_KEXEC */ diff --git a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c index f799cc278a9a..f3b10851bbbf 100644 --- a/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c +++ b/security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c @@ -137,7 +137,7 @@ void ima_add_kexec_buffer(struct kimage *image) /* * Restore the measurement list from the previous kernel. */ -void ima_load_kexec_buffer(void) +void __init ima_load_kexec_buffer(void) { void *kexec_buffer = NULL; size_t kexec_buffer_size = 0;
This commit has no direct upstream equivalent. After commit d48016d74836 ("mm,ima,kexec,of: use memblock_free_late from ima_free_kexec_buffer") in 5.15, there is a modpost warning for certain configurations: WARNING: modpost: vmlinux.o(.text+0xb14064): Section mismatch in reference from the function ima_free_kexec_buffer() to the function .init.text:__memblock_free_late() The function ima_free_kexec_buffer() references the function __init __memblock_free_late(). This is often because ima_free_kexec_buffer lacks a __init annotation or the annotation of __memblock_free_late is wrong. In mainline, there is no issue because ima_free_kexec_buffer() is marked as __init, which was done as part of commit b69a2afd5afc ("x86/kexec: Carry forward IMA measurement log on kexec") in 6.0, which is not suitable for stable. Mark ima_free_kexec_buffer() and its single caller ima_load_kexec_buffer() as __init in 5.15, as ima_load_kexec_buffer() is only called from ima_init(), which is __init, clearing up the warning. Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> --- drivers/of/kexec.c | 2 +- include/linux/of.h | 2 +- security/integrity/ima/ima.h | 2 +- security/integrity/ima/ima_kexec.c | 2 +- 4 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) --- base-commit: 8f790700c974345ab78054e109beddd84539f319 change-id: 20230905-5-15-of-kexec-modpost-warning-6a6b48f30ebf Best regards,