diff mbox series

[v2,02/12] dt-bindings: net: starfive,jh7110-dwmac: Drop superfluous select

Message ID 20231029042712.520010-3-cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com
State New
Headers show
Series Enable networking support for StarFive JH7100 SoC | expand

Commit Message

Cristian Ciocaltea Oct. 29, 2023, 4:27 a.m. UTC
The usage of 'select' doesn't seem to have any influence on how this
binding schema is applied to the nodes, hence remove it.

Signed-off-by: Cristian Ciocaltea <cristian.ciocaltea@collabora.com>
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml   | 9 ---------
 1 file changed, 9 deletions(-)

Comments

Krzysztof Kozlowski Oct. 30, 2023, 7:27 a.m. UTC | #1
On 29/10/2023 22:08, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
> On 10/29/23 13:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 29/10/2023 05:27, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>>> The usage of 'select' doesn't seem to have any influence on how this
>>> binding schema is applied to the nodes, hence remove it.
>>>
>>
>> It has. Why do you think it doesn't? You should see new errors from
>> dwmac schema.
> 
> This patch came as a result of testing both variants (w/ and w/o
> 'select') with several different compatible strings and seeing
> consistent output:
> 
> - "starfive,jh7110-dwmac", "invalid";
> - "starfive,jh7110-dwmac";
> - "invalid", "snps,dwmac-5.20";
> - "invalid"
> 
> Did I miss something?

Testing all bindings? The select is there to prevent matching unrelated
bindings.

Best regards,
Krzysztof
Cristian Ciocaltea Oct. 30, 2023, 7:25 p.m. UTC | #2
On 10/30/23 09:27, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
> On 29/10/2023 22:08, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>> On 10/29/23 13:18, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>>> On 29/10/2023 05:27, Cristian Ciocaltea wrote:
>>>> The usage of 'select' doesn't seem to have any influence on how this
>>>> binding schema is applied to the nodes, hence remove it.
>>>>
>>>
>>> It has. Why do you think it doesn't? You should see new errors from
>>> dwmac schema.
>>
>> This patch came as a result of testing both variants (w/ and w/o
>> 'select') with several different compatible strings and seeing
>> consistent output:
>>
>> - "starfive,jh7110-dwmac", "invalid";
>> - "starfive,jh7110-dwmac";
>> - "invalid", "snps,dwmac-5.20";
>> - "invalid"
>>
>> Did I miss something?
> 
> Testing all bindings? The select is there to prevent matching unrelated
> bindings.

Indeed, my bad, as I've been using DT_SCHEMA_FILES to restrict the scope
during initial testing and missed to include later other schemas for an
extended validation (note that since [1] it's possible to specify a list
of file paths separated by ':').

Will drop this in v3.

[1] 25eba1598c8e ("dt-bindings: Fix multi pattern support in
DT_SCHEMA_FILES")

Thanks,
Cristian
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml
index 5e7cfbbebce6..cc3e1c6fc135 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/starfive,jh7110-dwmac.yaml
@@ -11,15 +11,6 @@  maintainers:
   - Emil Renner Berthing <kernel@esmil.dk>
   - Samin Guo <samin.guo@starfivetech.com>
 
-select:
-  properties:
-    compatible:
-      contains:
-        enum:
-          - starfive,jh7110-dwmac
-  required:
-    - compatible
-
 properties:
   compatible:
     items: