diff mbox series

[v2] bus: mhi: host: Add alignment check for event ring read pointer

Message ID 20231031-alignment_check-v2-1-1441db7c5efd@quicinc.com
State Accepted
Commit eff9704f5332a13b08fbdbe0f84059c9e7051d5f
Headers show
Series [v2] bus: mhi: host: Add alignment check for event ring read pointer | expand

Commit Message

Krishna Chaitanya Chundru Oct. 31, 2023, 9:51 a.m. UTC
Though we do check the event ring read pointer by "is_valid_ring_ptr"
to make sure it is in the buffer range, but there is another risk the
pointer may be not aligned.  Since we are expecting event ring elements
are 128 bits(struct mhi_ring_element) aligned, an unaligned read pointer
could lead to multiple issues like DoS or ring buffer memory corruption.

So add a alignment check for event ring read pointer.

Fixes: ec32332df764 ("bus: mhi: core: Sanity check values from remote device before use")
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@quicinc.com>
---
Changes in v2:
- Change the modulus operation to bit-wise & operation as suggested by Jeff.
- Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231023-alignment_check-v1-1-2ca5716d5c15@quicinc.com
---
 drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)


---
base-commit: 71e68e182e382e951d6248bccc3c960dcec5a718
change-id: 20231013-alignment_check-c013f509d24a

Best regards,

Comments

Jeffrey Hugo Nov. 3, 2023, 2:54 p.m. UTC | #1
On 10/31/2023 3:51 AM, Krishna chaitanya chundru wrote:
> Though we do check the event ring read pointer by "is_valid_ring_ptr"
> to make sure it is in the buffer range, but there is another risk the
> pointer may be not aligned.  Since we are expecting event ring elements
> are 128 bits(struct mhi_ring_element) aligned, an unaligned read pointer
> could lead to multiple issues like DoS or ring buffer memory corruption.
> 
> So add a alignment check for event ring read pointer.
> 
> Fixes: ec32332df764 ("bus: mhi: core: Sanity check values from remote device before use")
> cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@quicinc.com>

Reviewed-by: Jeffrey Hugo <quic_jhugo@quicinc.com>
Manivannan Sadhasivam Nov. 5, 2023, 8:33 a.m. UTC | #2
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 03:21:05PM +0530, Krishna chaitanya chundru wrote:
> Though we do check the event ring read pointer by "is_valid_ring_ptr"
> to make sure it is in the buffer range, but there is another risk the
> pointer may be not aligned.  Since we are expecting event ring elements
> are 128 bits(struct mhi_ring_element) aligned, an unaligned read pointer
> could lead to multiple issues like DoS or ring buffer memory corruption.
> 
> So add a alignment check for event ring read pointer.
> 
> Fixes: ec32332df764 ("bus: mhi: core: Sanity check values from remote device before use")
> cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@quicinc.com>

Applied to mhi-next!

- Mani

> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Change the modulus operation to bit-wise & operation as suggested by Jeff.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231023-alignment_check-v1-1-2ca5716d5c15@quicinc.com
> ---
>  drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
> index 499590437e9b..e765c16a99d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
> @@ -268,7 +268,8 @@ static void mhi_del_ring_element(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>  
>  static bool is_valid_ring_ptr(struct mhi_ring *ring, dma_addr_t addr)
>  {
> -	return addr >= ring->iommu_base && addr < ring->iommu_base + ring->len;
> +	return addr >= ring->iommu_base && addr < ring->iommu_base + ring->len &&
> +			!(addr & (sizeof(struct mhi_ring_element) - 1));
>  }
>  
>  int mhi_destroy_device(struct device *dev, void *data)
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 71e68e182e382e951d6248bccc3c960dcec5a718
> change-id: 20231013-alignment_check-c013f509d24a
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@quicinc.com>
> 
>
Manivannan Sadhasivam Nov. 9, 2023, 4:34 p.m. UTC | #3
On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 03:21:05PM +0530, Krishna chaitanya chundru wrote:
> Though we do check the event ring read pointer by "is_valid_ring_ptr"
> to make sure it is in the buffer range, but there is another risk the
> pointer may be not aligned.  Since we are expecting event ring elements
> are 128 bits(struct mhi_ring_element) aligned, an unaligned read pointer
> could lead to multiple issues like DoS or ring buffer memory corruption.
> 
> So add a alignment check for event ring read pointer.
> 
> Fixes: ec32332df764 ("bus: mhi: core: Sanity check values from remote device before use")
> cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@quicinc.com>

Applied to mhi-next!

- Mani

> ---
> Changes in v2:
> - Change the modulus operation to bit-wise & operation as suggested by Jeff.
> - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231023-alignment_check-v1-1-2ca5716d5c15@quicinc.com
> ---
>  drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c | 3 ++-
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
> index 499590437e9b..e765c16a99d1 100644
> --- a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
> +++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
> @@ -268,7 +268,8 @@ static void mhi_del_ring_element(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
>  
>  static bool is_valid_ring_ptr(struct mhi_ring *ring, dma_addr_t addr)
>  {
> -	return addr >= ring->iommu_base && addr < ring->iommu_base + ring->len;
> +	return addr >= ring->iommu_base && addr < ring->iommu_base + ring->len &&
> +			!(addr & (sizeof(struct mhi_ring_element) - 1));
>  }
>  
>  int mhi_destroy_device(struct device *dev, void *data)
> 
> ---
> base-commit: 71e68e182e382e951d6248bccc3c960dcec5a718
> change-id: 20231013-alignment_check-c013f509d24a
> 
> Best regards,
> -- 
> Krishna chaitanya chundru <quic_krichai@quicinc.com>
> 
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
index 499590437e9b..e765c16a99d1 100644
--- a/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
+++ b/drivers/bus/mhi/host/main.c
@@ -268,7 +268,8 @@  static void mhi_del_ring_element(struct mhi_controller *mhi_cntrl,
 
 static bool is_valid_ring_ptr(struct mhi_ring *ring, dma_addr_t addr)
 {
-	return addr >= ring->iommu_base && addr < ring->iommu_base + ring->len;
+	return addr >= ring->iommu_base && addr < ring->iommu_base + ring->len &&
+			!(addr & (sizeof(struct mhi_ring_element) - 1));
 }
 
 int mhi_destroy_device(struct device *dev, void *data)