diff mbox series

kunit: tool: add parsing of all files in directory

Message ID 20240222221814.3572215-1-rmoar@google.com
State New
Headers show
Series kunit: tool: add parsing of all files in directory | expand

Commit Message

Rae Moar Feb. 22, 2024, 10:18 p.m. UTC
Add ability to parse all files within a directory. Additionally add the
ability to parse all results in the KUnit debugfs repository.

How to parse all files in directory:

./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse [directory path]

How to parse KUnit debugfs repository:

./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse debugfs

For each file, the parser outputs the file name, results, and test
summary. At the end of all parsing, the parser outputs a total summary
line.

This feature can be easily tested on the tools/testing/kunit/test_data/
directory.

Signed-off-by: Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com>
---
 tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)


base-commit: 08c454e26daab6f843e5883fb96f680f11784fa6

Comments

Rae Moar Feb. 27, 2024, 7:41 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 6:37 PM Daniel Latypov <dlatypov@google.com> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Feb 22, 2024 at 2:18 PM Rae Moar <rmoar@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add ability to parse all files within a directory. Additionally add the
> > ability to parse all results in the KUnit debugfs repository.
>
> Nice, I'd been hoping for this.
> It's enough to pull me back in for a bit :)
>
> <snip>
>
> >  tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
> >  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
> > index bc74088c458a..827e6dac40ae 100755
> > --- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
> > +++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
> > @@ -511,19 +511,40 @@ def exec_handler(cli_args: argparse.Namespace) -> None:
> >
> >
> >  def parse_handler(cli_args: argparse.Namespace) -> None:
> > -       if cli_args.file is None:
> > +       parsed_files = []
>
> optional: can we annotate the type?
>   parsed_files = []  # type: List[str]

Hi Daniel!

Yes, happy to make this change for the next version.

>
> > +       total_test = kunit_parser.Test()
> > +       total_test.status = kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS
> > +       if cli_args.file_path is None:
> >                 sys.stdin.reconfigure(errors='backslashreplace')  # type: ignore
> >                 kunit_output = sys.stdin  # type: Iterable[str]
>
> This branch no longer does anything, since we only parse what's in
> `parsed_files`
>
> E.g. if you try
> $ kunit.py parse $FILENAME
> it'll work whereas
> $ kunit.py parse < $FILENAME
> will do nothing
>
> We'll need to rework the control flow somehow

Ahh I see. Thanks for bringing this to my attention! I will change
this for the next version.

>
> > -       else:
> > -               with open(cli_args.file, 'r', errors='backslashreplace') as f:
> > +       elif cli_args.file_path == "debugfs":
> > +               for (root, _, files) in os.walk("/sys/kernel/debug/kunit"):
> > +                       for file in files:
> > +                               if file == "results":
> > +                                       parsed_files.append(os.path.join(root, file))
> > +       elif os.path.isdir(cli_args.file_path):
> > +               for (root, _, files) in os.walk(cli_args.file_path):
> > +                       for file in files:
> > +                               parsed_files.append(os.path.join(root, file))
>
> just a note here, we could make this a bit terser via
>   parsed_files.extend(os.path.join(root, f) for f in files)
>
> and the debugfs branch could be rendered as
>   parsed_files.extend(os.path.join(root, f) for f in files if f == "results")
>

Will do.

> > +       elif os.path.isfile(cli_args.file_path):
> > +               parsed_files.append(cli_args.file_path)
>
> nit: should there be an `else` here that prints a warning?
>
> Example that would trigger this case and silently do nothing
> $ mkfifo /tmp/example_fifo
> $ ./tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py parse /tmp/example_fifo
> <no output>
>

Yep you are definitely right I will add one here.

>
> <snip>
>
> > @@ -569,8 +590,8 @@ def main(argv: Sequence[str]) -> None:
> >                                             help='Parses KUnit results from a file, '
> >                                             'and parses formatted results.')
> >         add_parse_opts(parse_parser)
> > -       parse_parser.add_argument('file',
> > -                                 help='Specifies the file to read results from.',
> > +       parse_parser.add_argument('file_path',
> > +                                 help='Specifies the file path to read results from.',
>
> Should this mention that the make `debugfs` string works?
>
> >                                   type=str, nargs='?', metavar='input_file')
>
> Tangent: would it be useful to allow the user to pass in multiple
> files now and set this to nargs='*'?
>
> E.g.
> $ kunit.py parse /my/dir/some_prefix*
>
> It would also let people implement their own version of the debugfs logic via
> $ find /other/debugfs/dir -name 'results' | xargs kunit.py parse
>
> That could be useful if the user has recursively copied off the
> debugfs from a test machine and wants to inspect it elsewhere, for
> example.
>

Oh this is an interesting idea. I will play around with it!

Thanks for looking this patch over!
-Rae

> Thanks,
> Daniel
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
index bc74088c458a..827e6dac40ae 100755
--- a/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
+++ b/tools/testing/kunit/kunit.py
@@ -511,19 +511,40 @@  def exec_handler(cli_args: argparse.Namespace) -> None:
 
 
 def parse_handler(cli_args: argparse.Namespace) -> None:
-	if cli_args.file is None:
+	parsed_files = []
+	total_test = kunit_parser.Test()
+	total_test.status = kunit_parser.TestStatus.SUCCESS
+	if cli_args.file_path is None:
 		sys.stdin.reconfigure(errors='backslashreplace')  # type: ignore
 		kunit_output = sys.stdin  # type: Iterable[str]
-	else:
-		with open(cli_args.file, 'r', errors='backslashreplace') as f:
+	elif cli_args.file_path == "debugfs":
+		for (root, _, files) in os.walk("/sys/kernel/debug/kunit"):
+			for file in files:
+				if file == "results":
+					parsed_files.append(os.path.join(root, file))
+	elif os.path.isdir(cli_args.file_path):
+		for (root, _, files) in os.walk(cli_args.file_path):
+			for file in files:
+				parsed_files.append(os.path.join(root, file))
+	elif os.path.isfile(cli_args.file_path):
+		parsed_files.append(cli_args.file_path)
+
+	for file in parsed_files:
+		print(file)
+		with open(file, 'r', errors='backslashreplace') as f:
 			kunit_output = f.read().splitlines()
-	# We know nothing about how the result was created!
-	metadata = kunit_json.Metadata()
-	request = KunitParseRequest(raw_output=cli_args.raw_output,
-					json=cli_args.json)
-	result, _ = parse_tests(request, metadata, kunit_output)
-	if result.status != KunitStatus.SUCCESS:
-		sys.exit(1)
+		# We know nothing about how the result was created!
+		metadata = kunit_json.Metadata()
+		request = KunitParseRequest(raw_output=cli_args.raw_output,
+						json=cli_args.json)
+		_, test = parse_tests(request, metadata, kunit_output)
+		total_test.subtests.append(test)
+
+	if len(parsed_files) > 1: # if more than one file was parsed output total summary
+		print('All files parsed.')
+		stdout.print_with_timestamp(kunit_parser.DIVIDER)
+		kunit_parser.bubble_up_test_results(total_test)
+		kunit_parser.print_summary_line(total_test)
 
 
 subcommand_handlers_map = {
@@ -569,8 +590,8 @@  def main(argv: Sequence[str]) -> None:
 					    help='Parses KUnit results from a file, '
 					    'and parses formatted results.')
 	add_parse_opts(parse_parser)
-	parse_parser.add_argument('file',
-				  help='Specifies the file to read results from.',
+	parse_parser.add_argument('file_path',
+				  help='Specifies the file path to read results from.',
 				  type=str, nargs='?', metavar='input_file')
 
 	cli_args = parser.parse_args(massage_argv(argv))