| Message ID | 20240423175900.702640-4-prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add PFC support for Renesas RZ/V2H(P) SoC | expand |
Hi Prabhakar, On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 7:59 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote: > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > The pin configuration bits have been growing for every new SoCs being > added for the pinctrl-rzg2l driver which would mean updating the macros > every time for each new configuration. To avoid this allocate additional > bits for pin configuration by relocating the known fixed bits to the very > end of the configuration. > > Also update the size of 'cfg' to 'u64' to allow more configuration bits in > the 'struct rzg2l_variable_pin_cfg'. > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > --- > RFC->v2 > - Merged the macros and rzg2l_variable_pin_cfg changes into single patch > - Updated types for the config changes Thanks for the update! > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c > @@ -78,9 +78,9 @@ > PIN_CFG_FILNUM | \ > PIN_CFG_FILCLKSEL) > > -#define PIN_CFG_PIN_MAP_MASK GENMASK_ULL(35, 28) > -#define PIN_CFG_PIN_REG_MASK GENMASK(27, 20) > -#define PIN_CFG_MASK GENMASK(19, 0) > +#define PIN_CFG_PIN_MAP_MASK GENMASK_ULL(62, 55) > +#define PIN_CFG_PIN_REG_MASK GENMASK_ULL(54, 47) > +#define PIN_CFG_MASK GENMASK_ULL(46, 0) > > /* > * m indicates the bitmap of supported pins, a is the register index > @@ -241,9 +241,9 @@ struct rzg2l_dedicated_configs { > * @pin: port pin > */ > struct rzg2l_variable_pin_cfg { > - u32 cfg:20; > - u32 port:5; > - u32 pin:3; > + u64 cfg:46; 47, to match PIN_CFG_MASK()? > + u64 port:5; > + u64 pin:3; > }; To avoid such mistakes, and to increase uniformity, I think it would be good to get rid of this structure, and replace it by masks, to be used with FIELD_GET() and FIELD_PREP_CONST(). Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
Hi Geert, Thank you for the review. On Wed, May 22, 2024 at 11:19 AM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> wrote: > > Hi Prabhakar, > > On Tue, Apr 23, 2024 at 7:59 PM Prabhakar <prabhakar.csengg@gmail.com> wrote: > > From: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > > > The pin configuration bits have been growing for every new SoCs being > > added for the pinctrl-rzg2l driver which would mean updating the macros > > every time for each new configuration. To avoid this allocate additional > > bits for pin configuration by relocating the known fixed bits to the very > > end of the configuration. > > > > Also update the size of 'cfg' to 'u64' to allow more configuration bits in > > the 'struct rzg2l_variable_pin_cfg'. > > > > Signed-off-by: Lad Prabhakar <prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@bp.renesas.com> > > --- > > RFC->v2 > > - Merged the macros and rzg2l_variable_pin_cfg changes into single patch > > - Updated types for the config changes > > Thanks for the update! > > > --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c > > +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c > > @@ -78,9 +78,9 @@ > > PIN_CFG_FILNUM | \ > > PIN_CFG_FILCLKSEL) > > > > -#define PIN_CFG_PIN_MAP_MASK GENMASK_ULL(35, 28) > > -#define PIN_CFG_PIN_REG_MASK GENMASK(27, 20) > > -#define PIN_CFG_MASK GENMASK(19, 0) > > +#define PIN_CFG_PIN_MAP_MASK GENMASK_ULL(62, 55) > > +#define PIN_CFG_PIN_REG_MASK GENMASK_ULL(54, 47) > > +#define PIN_CFG_MASK GENMASK_ULL(46, 0) > > > > /* > > * m indicates the bitmap of supported pins, a is the register index > > > @@ -241,9 +241,9 @@ struct rzg2l_dedicated_configs { > > * @pin: port pin > > */ > > struct rzg2l_variable_pin_cfg { > > - u32 cfg:20; > > - u32 port:5; > > - u32 pin:3; > > + u64 cfg:46; > > 47, to match PIN_CFG_MASK()? > Oops, I missed that. > > + u64 port:5; > > + u64 pin:3; > > }; > > To avoid such mistakes, and to increase uniformity, I think it would > be good to get rid of this structure, and replace it by masks, to be > used with FIELD_GET() and FIELD_PREP_CONST(). > Agreed, I will make a patch on top of this patch (so that its easier for review). Cheers, Prabhakar
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c index dbcf009837ef..9bb9cc63f9df 100644 --- a/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c +++ b/drivers/pinctrl/renesas/pinctrl-rzg2l.c @@ -78,9 +78,9 @@ PIN_CFG_FILNUM | \ PIN_CFG_FILCLKSEL) -#define PIN_CFG_PIN_MAP_MASK GENMASK_ULL(35, 28) -#define PIN_CFG_PIN_REG_MASK GENMASK(27, 20) -#define PIN_CFG_MASK GENMASK(19, 0) +#define PIN_CFG_PIN_MAP_MASK GENMASK_ULL(62, 55) +#define PIN_CFG_PIN_REG_MASK GENMASK_ULL(54, 47) +#define PIN_CFG_MASK GENMASK_ULL(46, 0) /* * m indicates the bitmap of supported pins, a is the register index @@ -102,8 +102,8 @@ * (b * 8) and f is the pin configuration capabilities supported. */ #define RZG2L_SINGLE_PIN BIT_ULL(63) -#define RZG2L_SINGLE_PIN_INDEX_MASK GENMASK(30, 24) -#define RZG2L_SINGLE_PIN_BITS_MASK GENMASK(22, 20) +#define RZG2L_SINGLE_PIN_INDEX_MASK GENMASK_ULL(62, 56) +#define RZG2L_SINGLE_PIN_BITS_MASK GENMASK_ULL(55, 53) #define RZG2L_SINGLE_PIN_PACK(p, b, f) (RZG2L_SINGLE_PIN | \ FIELD_PREP_CONST(RZG2L_SINGLE_PIN_INDEX_MASK, (p)) | \ @@ -241,9 +241,9 @@ struct rzg2l_dedicated_configs { * @pin: port pin */ struct rzg2l_variable_pin_cfg { - u32 cfg:20; - u32 port:5; - u32 pin:3; + u64 cfg:46; + u64 port:5; + u64 pin:3; }; struct rzg2l_pinctrl_data { @@ -1082,7 +1082,8 @@ static int rzg2l_pinctrl_pinconf_get(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, const struct pinctrl_pin_desc *pin = &pctrl->desc.pins[_pin]; u64 *pin_data = pin->drv_data; unsigned int arg = 0; - u32 off, cfg; + u32 off; + u64 cfg; int ret; u8 bit; @@ -1186,7 +1187,8 @@ static int rzg2l_pinctrl_pinconf_set(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, u64 *pin_data = pin->drv_data; enum pin_config_param param; unsigned int i, arg, index; - u32 cfg, off; + u32 off; + u64 cfg; int ret; u8 bit; @@ -2414,9 +2416,9 @@ static void rzg2l_pinctrl_pm_setup_regs(struct rzg2l_pinctrl *pctrl, bool suspen for (u32 port = 0; port < nports; port++) { bool has_iolh, has_ien; - u32 off, caps; + u64 cfg, caps; u8 pincnt; - u64 cfg; + u32 off; cfg = pctrl->data->port_pin_configs[port]; off = RZG2L_PIN_CFG_TO_PORT_OFFSET(cfg); @@ -2460,12 +2462,14 @@ static void rzg2l_pinctrl_pm_setup_regs(struct rzg2l_pinctrl *pctrl, bool suspen static void rzg2l_pinctrl_pm_setup_dedicated_regs(struct rzg2l_pinctrl *pctrl, bool suspend) { struct rzg2l_pinctrl_reg_cache *cache = pctrl->dedicated_cache; + u64 caps; + u32 i; /* * Make sure entries in pctrl->data->n_dedicated_pins[] having the same * port offset are close together. */ - for (u32 i = 0, caps = 0; i < pctrl->data->n_dedicated_pins; i++) { + for (i = 0, caps = 0; i < pctrl->data->n_dedicated_pins; i++) { bool has_iolh, has_ien; u32 off, next_off = 0; u64 cfg, next_cfg;