diff mbox series

[v2] ACPI: scan: Avoid enumerating devices with clearly invalid _STA values

Message ID 12427278.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher
State New
Headers show
Series [v2] ACPI: scan: Avoid enumerating devices with clearly invalid _STA values | expand

Commit Message

Rafael J. Wysocki April 30, 2024, 4:02 p.m. UTC 
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

The return value of _STA with the "present" bit unset and the "enabled"
bit set is clearly invalid as per the ACPI specification, Section 6.3.7
"_STA (Device Status)", so make the ACPI device enumeration code
disregard devices with such _STA return values.

Also, because this implies that status.enabled will only be set if
status.present is set too, acpi_device_is_enabled() can be modified
to simply return the value of the former.

Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/06_Device_Configuration.html#sta-device-status
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/88179311a503493099028c12ca37d430@huawei.com/
Suggested-by: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
---

v1 -> v2:
   * Fix a confusing comment.
   * Add R-by from Jonathan (thank you!)

---
 drivers/acpi/bus.c  |   11 +++++++++++
 drivers/acpi/scan.c |    2 +-
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

Comments

Sudeep Holla April 30, 2024, 4:16 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Tue, Apr 30, 2024 at 06:02:20PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> 
> The return value of _STA with the "present" bit unset and the "enabled"
> bit set is clearly invalid as per the ACPI specification, Section 6.3.7
> "_STA (Device Status)", so make the ACPI device enumeration code
> disregard devices with such _STA return values.
> 
> Also, because this implies that status.enabled will only be set if
> status.present is set too, acpi_device_is_enabled() can be modified
> to simply return the value of the former.
>

Nice!

FWIW,

Reviewed-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>

--
Regards,
Sudeep
Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan April 30, 2024, 8:02 p.m. UTC | #2 
On 4/30/24 9:02 AM, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
>
> The return value of _STA with the "present" bit unset and the "enabled"
> bit set is clearly invalid as per the ACPI specification, Section 6.3.7
> "_STA (Device Status)", so make the ACPI device enumeration code
> disregard devices with such _STA return values.
>
> Also, because this implies that status.enabled will only be set if
> status.present is set too, acpi_device_is_enabled() can be modified
> to simply return the value of the former.
>
> Link: https://uefi.org/specs/ACPI/6.5/06_Device_Configuration.html#sta-device-status
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-acpi/88179311a503493099028c12ca37d430@huawei.com/
> Suggested-by: Salil Mehta <salil.mehta@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Jonathan Cameron <Jonathan.Cameron@huawei.com>
> ---

Reviewed-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan <sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@linux.intel.com>

>
> v1 -> v2:
>    * Fix a confusing comment.
>    * Add R-by from Jonathan (thank you!)
>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/bus.c  |   11 +++++++++++
>  drivers/acpi/scan.c |    2 +-
>  2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/bus.c
> @@ -112,6 +112,17 @@ int acpi_bus_get_status(struct acpi_devi
>  	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
> +	if (!device->status.present && device->status.enabled) {
> +		pr_info(FW_BUG "Device [%s] status [%08x]: not present and enabled\n",
> +			device->pnp.bus_id, (u32)sta);

Nit: Do you think it should be pr_warn ?

> +		device->status.enabled = 0;
> +		/*
> +		 * The status is clearly invalid, so clear the functional bit as
> +		 * well to avoid attempting to use the device.
> +		 */
> +		device->status.functional = 0;
> +	}
> +
>  	acpi_set_device_status(device, sta);
>  
>  	if (device->status.functional && !device->status.present) {
> Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> +++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
> @@ -1962,7 +1962,7 @@ bool acpi_device_is_present(const struct
>  
>  bool acpi_device_is_enabled(const struct acpi_device *adev)
>  {
> -	return adev->status.present && adev->status.enabled;
> +	return adev->status.enabled;
>  }
>  
>  static bool acpi_scan_handler_matching(struct acpi_scan_handler *handler,
>
>
>
>
diff mbox series

Patch

Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/bus.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/bus.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/bus.c
@@ -112,6 +112,17 @@  int acpi_bus_get_status(struct acpi_devi
 	if (ACPI_FAILURE(status))
 		return -ENODEV;
 
+	if (!device->status.present && device->status.enabled) {
+		pr_info(FW_BUG "Device [%s] status [%08x]: not present and enabled\n",
+			device->pnp.bus_id, (u32)sta);
+		device->status.enabled = 0;
+		/*
+		 * The status is clearly invalid, so clear the functional bit as
+		 * well to avoid attempting to use the device.
+		 */
+		device->status.functional = 0;
+	}
+
 	acpi_set_device_status(device, sta);
 
 	if (device->status.functional && !device->status.present) {
Index: linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
===================================================================
--- linux-pm.orig/drivers/acpi/scan.c
+++ linux-pm/drivers/acpi/scan.c
@@ -1962,7 +1962,7 @@  bool acpi_device_is_present(const struct
 
 bool acpi_device_is_enabled(const struct acpi_device *adev)
 {
-	return adev->status.present && adev->status.enabled;
+	return adev->status.enabled;
 }
 
 static bool acpi_scan_handler_matching(struct acpi_scan_handler *handler,