diff mbox series

selftests/memfd: fix spelling mistakes

Message ID 20240501231317.24648-1-sauravshah.31@gmail.com
State Accepted
Commit a4c43b8a09805a7b9b39344c1ba304a5641aca77
Headers show
Series selftests/memfd: fix spelling mistakes | expand

Commit Message

Saurav Shah May 1, 2024, 11:13 p.m. UTC 
Fix spelling mistakes in the comments.

Signed-off-by: Saurav Shah <sauravshah.31@gmail.com>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/memfd/fuse_test.c  | 2 +-
 tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c | 2 +-
 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/fuse_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/fuse_test.c
index 93798c8c5d54..dbc171a3806d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/fuse_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/fuse_test.c
@@ -306,7 +306,7 @@  int main(int argc, char **argv)
 	 * then the kernel did a page-replacement or canceled the read() (or
 	 * whatever magic it did..). In that case, the memfd object is still
 	 * all zero.
-	 * In case the memfd-object was *not* sealed, the read() was successfull
+	 * In case the memfd-object was *not* sealed, the read() was successful
 	 * and the memfd object must *not* be all zero.
 	 * Note that in real scenarios, there might be a mixture of both, but
 	 * in this test-cases, we have explicit 200ms delays which should be
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c
index 18f585684e20..95af2d78fd31 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/memfd/memfd_test.c
@@ -1528,7 +1528,7 @@  static void test_share_open(char *banner, char *b_suffix)
 
 /*
  * Test sharing via fork()
- * Test whether seal-modifications work as expected with forked childs.
+ * Test whether seal-modifications work as expected with forked children.
  */
 static void test_share_fork(char *banner, char *b_suffix)
 {