diff mbox series

[v1,1/1] spi: Replace custom code with device_match_acpi_handle()

Message ID 20240510204952.2582093-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com
State Accepted
Commit 2d19ea9e8840a1a77b1d464b06e62dd9b0f21e0d
Headers show
Series [v1,1/1] spi: Replace custom code with device_match_acpi_handle() | expand

Commit Message

Andy Shevchenko May 10, 2024, 8:49 p.m. UTC
Since driver core provides a generic device_match_acpi_handle()
we may replace the custom code with it.

Signed-off-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
---
 drivers/spi/spi.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

Comments

Mark Brown June 5, 2024, 9:22 p.m. UTC | #1
On Thu, Jun 06, 2024 at 12:08:35AM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> On Fri, May 10, 2024 at 11:49:52PM +0300, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > Since driver core provides a generic device_match_acpi_handle()
> > we may replace the custom code with it.

> Hmm... Other more recent patches went through, is this lost in cracks?

Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time
for review.  People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so 
on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes)
please allow at least a couple of weeks for review.  If there have been
review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed.

Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at
all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed
directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches
anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are
some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches
for the subsystem are normally handled.
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
index ef0027b9cae5..b2efd4964f7c 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -2712,7 +2712,7 @@  static int acpi_spi_add_resource(struct acpi_resource *ares, void *data)
 				return -ENODEV;
 
 			if (ctlr) {
-				if (ACPI_HANDLE(ctlr->dev.parent) != parent_handle)
+				if (!device_match_acpi_handle(ctlr->dev.parent, parent_handle))
 					return -ENODEV;
 			} else {
 				struct acpi_device *adev;
@@ -2811,7 +2811,7 @@  struct spi_device *acpi_spi_device_alloc(struct spi_controller *ctlr,
 
 	if (!lookup.max_speed_hz &&
 	    ACPI_SUCCESS(acpi_get_parent(adev->handle, &parent_handle)) &&
-	    ACPI_HANDLE(lookup.ctlr->dev.parent) == parent_handle) {
+	    device_match_acpi_handle(lookup.ctlr->dev.parent, parent_handle)) {
 		/* Apple does not use _CRS but nested devices for SPI slaves */
 		acpi_spi_parse_apple_properties(adev, &lookup);
 	}