Message ID | 20240517013350.11278-1-pkshih@realtek.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [v2] wifi: rtw89: fix HW scan not aborting properly | expand |
Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> wrote: > From: Po-Hao Huang <phhuang@realtek.com> > > There is a length limit on the commands we send to firmware, so > dividing to two commands is sometimes required when scanning. > When aborting scan, we should not send second scan command to > firmware after the first one is finished. This could cause some > unexpected errors when we cannot receive firmware events > (e.g. in suspend). > > Another case is scan happens before suspending, ieee80211_do_stop() is > called to abort scan and driver indicate scan completion by > ieee80211_scan_completed(), which queues event to scan work. But scan work > might be late to execute after ieee80211_do_stop(). To correct this, driver > indicates ieee80211_scan_completed() before returning, so that > ieee80211_do_stop() can flush scan work properly. > > Fixes: bcbefbd032df ("wifi: rtw89: add wait/completion for abort scan") > Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org > Co-developed-by: Chih-Kang Chang <gary.chang@realtek.com> > Signed-off-by: Chih-Kang Chang <gary.chang@realtek.com> > Signed-off-by: Po-Hao Huang <phhuang@realtek.com> > Signed-off-by: Ping-Ke Shih <pkshih@realtek.com> 1 patch(es) applied to rtw-next branch of rtw.git, thanks. 669b692247d4 wifi: rtw89: fix HW scan not aborting properly --- https://github.com/pkshih/rtw.git
diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c index 044a5b90c7f4..f5cd06c35982 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/fw.c @@ -6245,7 +6245,14 @@ void rtw89_hw_scan_abort(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct ieee80211_vif *vif) ret = rtw89_hw_scan_offload(rtwdev, vif, false); if (ret) - rtw89_hw_scan_complete(rtwdev, vif, true); + rtw89_warn(rtwdev, "rtw89_hw_scan_offload failed ret %d\n", ret); + + /* Indicate ieee80211_scan_completed() before returning, which is safe + * because scan abort command always waits for completion of + * RTW89_SCAN_END_SCAN_NOTIFY, so that ieee80211_stop() can flush scan + * work properly. + */ + rtw89_hw_scan_complete(rtwdev, vif, true); } static bool rtw89_is_any_vif_connected_or_connecting(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev) diff --git a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c index baefc30b88c4..824ece03d92d 100644 --- a/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c +++ b/drivers/net/wireless/realtek/rtw89/mac.c @@ -4756,6 +4756,9 @@ rtw89_mac_c2h_scanofld_rsp(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct sk_buff *skb, } return; case RTW89_SCAN_END_SCAN_NOTIFY: + if (rtwdev->scan_info.abort) + return; + if (rtwvif && rtwvif->scan_req && last_chan < rtwvif->scan_req->n_channels) { ret = rtw89_hw_scan_offload(rtwdev, vif, true); @@ -4764,7 +4767,7 @@ rtw89_mac_c2h_scanofld_rsp(struct rtw89_dev *rtwdev, struct sk_buff *skb, rtw89_warn(rtwdev, "HW scan failed: %d\n", ret); } } else { - rtw89_hw_scan_complete(rtwdev, vif, rtwdev->scan_info.abort); + rtw89_hw_scan_complete(rtwdev, vif, false); } break; case RTW89_SCAN_ENTER_OP_NOTIFY: