diff mbox series

[bpf-next,v2,4/6] selftests/bpf: Null checks for link in bpf_tcp_ca

Message ID 06755f462ddb7bc9f734f105e18c1d77c03811cb.1720146231.git.tanggeliang@kylinos.cn
State New
Headers show
Series skip ENOTSUPP BPF selftests | expand

Commit Message

Geliang Tang July 5, 2024, 2:38 a.m. UTC 
From: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>

Run bpf_tcp_ca selftests (./test_progs -t bpf_tcp_ca) on a Loongarch
platform, some "Segmentation fault" errors occur:

'''
 test_dctcp:PASS:bpf_dctcp__open_and_load 0 nsec
 test_dctcp:FAIL:bpf_map__attach_struct_ops unexpected error: -524
 #29/1    bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp:FAIL
 test_cubic:PASS:bpf_cubic__open_and_load 0 nsec
 test_cubic:FAIL:bpf_map__attach_struct_ops unexpected error: -524
 #29/2    bpf_tcp_ca/cubic:FAIL
 test_dctcp_fallback:PASS:dctcp_skel 0 nsec
 test_dctcp_fallback:PASS:bpf_dctcp__load 0 nsec
 test_dctcp_fallback:FAIL:dctcp link unexpected error: -524
 #29/4    bpf_tcp_ca/dctcp_fallback:FAIL
 test_write_sk_pacing:PASS:open_and_load 0 nsec
 test_write_sk_pacing:FAIL:attach_struct_ops unexpected error: -524
 #29/6    bpf_tcp_ca/write_sk_pacing:FAIL
 test_update_ca:PASS:open 0 nsec
 test_update_ca:FAIL:attach_struct_ops unexpected error: -524
 settcpca:FAIL:setsockopt unexpected setsockopt: \
					actual -1 == expected -1
 (network_helpers.c:99: errno: No such file or directory) \
					Failed to call post_socket_cb
 start_test:FAIL:start_server_str unexpected start_server_str: \
					actual -1 == expected -1
 test_update_ca:FAIL:ca1_ca1_cnt unexpected ca1_ca1_cnt: \
					actual 0 <= expected 0
 #29/9    bpf_tcp_ca/update_ca:FAIL
 #29      bpf_tcp_ca:FAIL
 Caught signal #11!
 Stack trace:
 ./test_progs(crash_handler+0x28)[0x5555567ed91c]
 linux-vdso.so.1(__vdso_rt_sigreturn+0x0)[0x7ffffee408b0]
 ./test_progs(bpf_link__update_map+0x80)[0x555556824a78]
 ./test_progs(+0x94d68)[0x5555564c4d68]
 ./test_progs(test_bpf_tcp_ca+0xe8)[0x5555564c6a88]
 ./test_progs(+0x3bde54)[0x5555567ede54]
 ./test_progs(main+0x61c)[0x5555567efd54]
 /usr/lib64/libc.so.6(+0x22208)[0x7ffff2aaa208]
 /usr/lib64/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xac)[0x7ffff2aaa30c]
 ./test_progs(_start+0x48)[0x55555646bca8]
 Segmentation fault
'''

This is because "link" returned by bpf_map__attach_struct_ops() is
NULL in this case. test_progs crashs when this NULL link passes to
bpf_link__update_map(). This patch adds NULL checks for all links
in bpf_tcp_ca to fix these errors. If "link" is NULL, goto the newly
added label "err" to destroy the skel.

v2:
 - use "goto err" instead of "return" as Eduard suggested.

Signed-off-by: Geliang Tang <tanggeliang@kylinos.cn>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c        | 16 ++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Comments

Eduard Zingerman July 8, 2024, 7:42 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Fri, 2024-07-05 at 10:38 +0800, Geliang Tang wrote:

[...]

I think that this patch is an improvement independent of the patch-set.
Please submit it separately.

>  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c        | 16 ++++++++++++----

[...]

> @@ -489,6 +494,7 @@ static void test_mixed_links(void)
>  	ASSERT_ERR(err, "update_map");
>  
>  	bpf_link__destroy(link);
> +err:

Nit: there are two links in this test, but ASSERT_OK_PTR is added only
     for a single one. Also note that bpf_link__destroy(NULL) works
     just fine, so it is possible to initialize links as NULL and make
     a jump to cleanup block w/o peeking exact position within that block.

>  	bpf_link__destroy(link_nl);
>  	tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
>  }

[...]
Geliang Tang July 10, 2024, 2:58 a.m. UTC | #2 
Hi Eduard,

On Mon, 2024-07-08 at 12:42 -0700, Eduard Zingerman wrote:
> On Fri, 2024-07-05 at 10:38 +0800, Geliang Tang wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> I think that this patch is an improvement independent of the patch-
> set.
> Please submit it separately.
> 
> >  .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c        | 16
> > ++++++++++++----
> 
> [...]
> 
> > @@ -489,6 +494,7 @@ static void test_mixed_links(void)
> >  	ASSERT_ERR(err, "update_map");
> >  
> >  	bpf_link__destroy(link);
> > +err:
> 
> Nit: there are two links in this test, but ASSERT_OK_PTR is added
> only
>      for a single one. Also note that bpf_link__destroy(NULL) works
>      just fine, so it is possible to initialize links as NULL and
> make
>      a jump to cleanup block w/o peeking exact position within that
> block.

Thanks for your review. I sent a set named "BPF selftests misc fixes"
yesterday to address your comments.

But reconsider it. I think here checking the first link (link_nl) is
enough. We can keep the second link as it.

I changed "BPF selftests misc fixes" as "Changes Requested".

Thanks,
-Geliang

> 
> >  	bpf_link__destroy(link_nl);
> >  	tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
> >  }
> 
> [...]
>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
index 5909c1f82f3b..9effdfb1a5ce 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/bpf_tcp_ca.c
@@ -407,7 +407,8 @@  static void test_update_ca(void)
 		return;
 
 	link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_update_1);
-	ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops");
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops"))
+		goto err;
 
 	do_test(&opts);
 	saved_ca1_cnt = skel->bss->ca1_cnt;
@@ -421,6 +422,7 @@  static void test_update_ca(void)
 	ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->ca2_cnt, 0, "ca2_ca2_cnt");
 
 	bpf_link__destroy(link);
+err:
 	tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
 }
 
@@ -443,7 +445,8 @@  static void test_update_wrong(void)
 		return;
 
 	link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_update_1);
-	ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops");
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops"))
+		goto err;
 
 	do_test(&opts);
 	saved_ca1_cnt = skel->bss->ca1_cnt;
@@ -456,6 +459,7 @@  static void test_update_wrong(void)
 	ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->ca1_cnt, saved_ca1_cnt, "ca2_ca1_cnt");
 
 	bpf_link__destroy(link);
+err:
 	tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
 }
 
@@ -480,7 +484,8 @@  static void test_mixed_links(void)
 	ASSERT_OK_PTR(link_nl, "attach_struct_ops_nl");
 
 	link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_update_1);
-	ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops");
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops"))
+		goto err;
 
 	do_test(&opts);
 	ASSERT_GT(skel->bss->ca1_cnt, 0, "ca1_ca1_cnt");
@@ -489,6 +494,7 @@  static void test_mixed_links(void)
 	ASSERT_ERR(err, "update_map");
 
 	bpf_link__destroy(link);
+err:
 	bpf_link__destroy(link_nl);
 	tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
 }
@@ -532,7 +538,8 @@  static void test_link_replace(void)
 	bpf_link__destroy(link);
 
 	link = bpf_map__attach_struct_ops(skel->maps.ca_update_2);
-	ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops_2nd");
+	if (!ASSERT_OK_PTR(link, "attach_struct_ops_2nd"))
+		goto err;
 
 	/* BPF_F_REPLACE with a wrong old map Fd. It should fail!
 	 *
@@ -555,6 +562,7 @@  static void test_link_replace(void)
 
 	bpf_link__destroy(link);
 
+err:
 	tcp_ca_update__destroy(skel);
 }