diff mbox series

[v6,1/3] spinlock: extend guard with spinlock_bh variants

Message ID 20241102175045.10408-1-ansuelsmth@gmail.com
State Superseded
Headers show
Series [v6,1/3] spinlock: extend guard with spinlock_bh variants | expand

Commit Message

Christian Marangi Nov. 2, 2024, 5:50 p.m. UTC 
Extend guard APIs with missing raw/spinlock_bh variants.

Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
---
Changes v5:
- Add Ack tag
Changes v4:
- Out of RFC
Changes v2:
- Add this patch

 include/linux/spinlock.h | 13 +++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)

Comments

Rob Herring (Arm) Nov. 4, 2024, 4:11 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Sat, 02 Nov 2024 18:50:34 +0100, Christian Marangi wrote:
> Add bindings for the Inside Secure SafeXcel EIP-93 crypto engine.
> 
> The IP is present on Airoha SoC and on various Mediatek devices and
> other SoC under different names like mtk-eip93 or PKTE.
> 
> All the compatible that currently doesn't have any user are defined but
> rejected waiting for an actual device that makes use of them.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Christian Marangi <ansuelsmth@gmail.com>
> ---
> Changes v6:
> - Add SoC specific compatible
> - Add now supported entry for compatible with no user
> Changes v5:
> - Comment out compatible with no current user
> Changes v4:
> - Out of RFC
> Changes v3:
> - Add SoC compatible with generic one
> Changes v2:
> - Change to better compatible
> - Add description for EIP93 models
> 
>  .../crypto/inside-secure,safexcel-eip93.yaml  | 67 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 67 insertions(+)
>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/crypto/inside-secure,safexcel-eip93.yaml
> 

Reviewed-by: Rob Herring (Arm) <robh@kernel.org>
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/include/linux/spinlock.h b/include/linux/spinlock.h
index 63dd8cf3c3c2..d3561c4a080e 100644
--- a/include/linux/spinlock.h
+++ b/include/linux/spinlock.h
@@ -548,6 +548,12 @@  DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(raw_spinlock_irq, raw_spinlock_t,
 
 DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1_COND(raw_spinlock_irq, _try, raw_spin_trylock_irq(_T->lock))
 
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(raw_spinlock_bh, raw_spinlock_t,
+		    raw_spin_lock_bh(_T->lock),
+		    raw_spin_unlock_bh(_T->lock))
+
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1_COND(raw_spinlock_bh, _try, raw_spin_trylock_bh(_T->lock))
+
 DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(raw_spinlock_irqsave, raw_spinlock_t,
 		    raw_spin_lock_irqsave(_T->lock, _T->flags),
 		    raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(_T->lock, _T->flags),
@@ -569,6 +575,13 @@  DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(spinlock_irq, spinlock_t,
 DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1_COND(spinlock_irq, _try,
 			 spin_trylock_irq(_T->lock))
 
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(spinlock_bh, spinlock_t,
+		    spin_lock_bh(_T->lock),
+		    spin_unlock_bh(_T->lock))
+
+DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1_COND(spinlock_bh, _try,
+			 spin_trylock_bh(_T->lock))
+
 DEFINE_LOCK_GUARD_1(spinlock_irqsave, spinlock_t,
 		    spin_lock_irqsave(_T->lock, _T->flags),
 		    spin_unlock_irqrestore(_T->lock, _T->flags),