Message ID | 20241219-topic-gmu_fw_ver-v1-2-d403a70052d8@oss.qualcomm.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | Print GMU version at boot on >A630 | expand |
On 24-12-19 23:36:56, Konrad Dybcio wrote: > From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com> > > Log the version for informational purposes, such as for keeping track > of possible GMU fw-related failures in crash / CI logs. > > Intentionally not implemented on the if (gmu->legacy) codepath, as > these registers seem not to be used on there. > > Downstream additionally warns if the firmware version is too old for > a given GPU, but we already pair the binary to a given GPU, so let's > not go there at the moment. > > Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com> > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 7 +++++++ > 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c > index 14db7376c712d19446b38152e480bd5a1e0a5198..a7ea2b2af1dc3816906236df929df36e37d8f606 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c > @@ -729,6 +729,7 @@ static int a6xx_gmu_fw_load(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu) > const struct firmware *fw_image = adreno_gpu->fw[ADRENO_FW_GMU]; > const struct block_header *blk; > u32 reg_offset; > + u32 ver; > > u32 itcm_base = 0x00000000; > u32 dtcm_base = 0x00040000; > @@ -775,6 +776,12 @@ static int a6xx_gmu_fw_load(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu) > } > } > > + ver = gmu_read(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_CORE_FW_VERSION); > + DRM_INFO("Loaded GMU firmware v%u.%u.%u\n", > + FIELD_GET(A6XX_GMU_CORE_FW_VERSION_MAJOR__MASK, ver), > + FIELD_GET(A6XX_GMU_CORE_FW_VERSION_MINOR__MASK, ver), > + FIELD_GET(A6XX_GMU_CORE_FW_VERSION_STEP__MASK, ver)); I get the following spam: [ 109.928924] [drm] Loaded GMU firmware v3.1.10 [ 110.301295] [drm] Loaded GMU firmware v3.1.10 [ 110.472620] [drm] Loaded GMU firmware v3.1.10 [ 111.164303] [drm] Loaded GMU firmware v3.1.10 [ 111.864830] [drm] Loaded GMU firmware v3.1.10 ... Stacktrace shows this being called from runtime resume: [ 19.380390] Call trace: [ 19.380391] show_stack+0x18/0x24 (C) [ 19.380399] dump_stack_lvl+0x40/0x84 [ 19.380403] dump_stack+0x18/0x24 [ 19.380405] a6xx_gmu_resume+0x450/0xc44 [msm] [ 19.380426] a6xx_gmu_pm_resume+0x34/0x220 [msm] [ 19.380437] adreno_runtime_resume+0x28/0x34 [msm] [ 19.380446] pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x28/0x3c [ 19.380451] __rpm_callback+0x84/0x390 [ 19.380453] rpm_resume+0x3d0/0x5c0 [ 19.380455] __pm_runtime_resume+0x4c/0x94 [ 19.380457] adreno_get_param+0xdc/0x274 [msm] [ 19.380466] msm_ioctl_get_param+0x5c/0x68 [msm] [ 19.380475] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xd4/0x10c [drm] [ 19.380491] drm_ioctl+0x26c/0x40c [drm] [ 19.380499] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x90/0xcc [ 19.380503] invoke_syscall+0x40/0xf8 [ 19.380505] el0_svc_common+0xac/0xdc [ 19.380506] do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 [ 19.380508] el0_svc+0x34/0x7c [ 19.380512] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0x108 [ 19.380513] el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c So maybe DRM_INFO_ONCE instead ? > + > return 0; > } > > > -- > 2.47.1 > >
Hi Am 13.02.25 um 17:35 schrieb Abel Vesa: > On 24-12-19 23:36:56, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com> >> >> Log the version for informational purposes, such as for keeping track >> of possible GMU fw-related failures in crash / CI logs. >> >> Intentionally not implemented on the if (gmu->legacy) codepath, as >> these registers seem not to be used on there. >> >> Downstream additionally warns if the firmware version is too old for >> a given GPU, but we already pair the binary to a given GPU, so let's >> not go there at the moment. >> >> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com> >> --- >> drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c | 7 +++++++ >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c >> index 14db7376c712d19446b38152e480bd5a1e0a5198..a7ea2b2af1dc3816906236df929df36e37d8f606 100644 >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c >> @@ -729,6 +729,7 @@ static int a6xx_gmu_fw_load(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu) >> const struct firmware *fw_image = adreno_gpu->fw[ADRENO_FW_GMU]; >> const struct block_header *blk; >> u32 reg_offset; >> + u32 ver; >> >> u32 itcm_base = 0x00000000; >> u32 dtcm_base = 0x00040000; >> @@ -775,6 +776,12 @@ static int a6xx_gmu_fw_load(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu) >> } >> } >> >> + ver = gmu_read(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_CORE_FW_VERSION); >> + DRM_INFO("Loaded GMU firmware v%u.%u.%u\n", >> + FIELD_GET(A6XX_GMU_CORE_FW_VERSION_MAJOR__MASK, ver), >> + FIELD_GET(A6XX_GMU_CORE_FW_VERSION_MINOR__MASK, ver), >> + FIELD_GET(A6XX_GMU_CORE_FW_VERSION_STEP__MASK, ver)); > I get the following spam: > > [ 109.928924] [drm] Loaded GMU firmware v3.1.10 > [ 110.301295] [drm] Loaded GMU firmware v3.1.10 > [ 110.472620] [drm] Loaded GMU firmware v3.1.10 > [ 111.164303] [drm] Loaded GMU firmware v3.1.10 > [ 111.864830] [drm] Loaded GMU firmware v3.1.10 > ... > > Stacktrace shows this being called from runtime resume: > > [ 19.380390] Call trace: > [ 19.380391] show_stack+0x18/0x24 (C) > [ 19.380399] dump_stack_lvl+0x40/0x84 > [ 19.380403] dump_stack+0x18/0x24 > [ 19.380405] a6xx_gmu_resume+0x450/0xc44 [msm] > [ 19.380426] a6xx_gmu_pm_resume+0x34/0x220 [msm] > [ 19.380437] adreno_runtime_resume+0x28/0x34 [msm] > [ 19.380446] pm_generic_runtime_resume+0x28/0x3c > [ 19.380451] __rpm_callback+0x84/0x390 > [ 19.380453] rpm_resume+0x3d0/0x5c0 > [ 19.380455] __pm_runtime_resume+0x4c/0x94 > [ 19.380457] adreno_get_param+0xdc/0x274 [msm] > [ 19.380466] msm_ioctl_get_param+0x5c/0x68 [msm] > [ 19.380475] drm_ioctl_kernel+0xd4/0x10c [drm] > [ 19.380491] drm_ioctl+0x26c/0x40c [drm] > [ 19.380499] __arm64_sys_ioctl+0x90/0xcc > [ 19.380503] invoke_syscall+0x40/0xf8 > [ 19.380505] el0_svc_common+0xac/0xdc > [ 19.380506] do_el0_svc+0x1c/0x28 > [ 19.380508] el0_svc+0x34/0x7c > [ 19.380512] el0t_64_sync_handler+0x84/0x108 > [ 19.380513] el0t_64_sync+0x198/0x19c > > So maybe DRM_INFO_ONCE instead ? drm_dbg() seems appropriate. Most of the time, firmware versions are not interesting. Best regards Thomas > >> + >> return 0; >> } >> >> >> -- >> 2.47.1 >> >>
On 13.02.2025 5:41 PM, Thomas Zimmermann wrote: > Hi > > Am 13.02.25 um 17:35 schrieb Abel Vesa: >> On 24-12-19 23:36:56, Konrad Dybcio wrote: >>> From: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com> >>> >>> Log the version for informational purposes, such as for keeping track >>> of possible GMU fw-related failures in crash / CI logs. >>> >>> Intentionally not implemented on the if (gmu->legacy) codepath, as >>> these registers seem not to be used on there. >>> >>> Downstream additionally warns if the firmware version is too old for >>> a given GPU, but we already pair the binary to a given GPU, so let's >>> not go there at the moment. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Konrad Dybcio <konrad.dybcio@oss.qualcomm.com> >>> --- [...] >> So maybe DRM_INFO_ONCE instead ? > > drm_dbg() seems appropriate. Most of the time, firmware versions are not interesting. Unfortunately, in our case they are, given users source them from all kinds of places.. Konrad
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c index 14db7376c712d19446b38152e480bd5a1e0a5198..a7ea2b2af1dc3816906236df929df36e37d8f606 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/adreno/a6xx_gmu.c @@ -729,6 +729,7 @@ static int a6xx_gmu_fw_load(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu) const struct firmware *fw_image = adreno_gpu->fw[ADRENO_FW_GMU]; const struct block_header *blk; u32 reg_offset; + u32 ver; u32 itcm_base = 0x00000000; u32 dtcm_base = 0x00040000; @@ -775,6 +776,12 @@ static int a6xx_gmu_fw_load(struct a6xx_gmu *gmu) } } + ver = gmu_read(gmu, REG_A6XX_GMU_CORE_FW_VERSION); + DRM_INFO("Loaded GMU firmware v%u.%u.%u\n", + FIELD_GET(A6XX_GMU_CORE_FW_VERSION_MAJOR__MASK, ver), + FIELD_GET(A6XX_GMU_CORE_FW_VERSION_MINOR__MASK, ver), + FIELD_GET(A6XX_GMU_CORE_FW_VERSION_STEP__MASK, ver)); + return 0; }