Message ID | 1480693134-31324-2-git-send-email-bgolaszewski@baylibre.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
On Friday 02 December 2016 09:08 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > The aemif clock is added twice to the lookup table in da850.c. This > breaks the children list of pll0_sysclk3 as we're using the same list > links in struct clk. When calling clk_set_rate(), we get stuck in > propagate_rate(). > > Create a separate clock for nand, inheriting the rate of the aemif > clock and retrieve it in the davinci_nand module. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> > --- > arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 7 ++++++- > drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c | 2 +- > 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c > index e770c97..1fcc986 100644 > --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c > +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c > @@ -367,6 +367,11 @@ static struct clk aemif_clk = { > .flags = ALWAYS_ENABLED, > }; > > +static struct clk nand_clk = { > + .name = "nand", > + .parent = &aemif_clk, > +}; > + > static struct clk usb11_clk = { > .name = "usb11", > .parent = &pll0_sysclk4, > @@ -537,7 +542,7 @@ static struct clk_lookup da850_clks[] = { > CLK("da830-mmc.0", NULL, &mmcsd0_clk), > CLK("da830-mmc.1", NULL, &mmcsd1_clk), > CLK("ti-aemif", NULL, &aemif_clk), > - CLK(NULL, "aemif", &aemif_clk), > + CLK(NULL, "nand", &nand_clk), Why use a NULL device name here? > CLK("ohci-da8xx", "usb11", &usb11_clk), > CLK("musb-da8xx", "usb20", &usb20_clk), > CLK("spi_davinci.0", NULL, &spi0_clk), > diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c > index 27fa8b8..5857d06 100644 > --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c > +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c > @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ static int nand_davinci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > > ret = -EINVAL; > > - info->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "aemif"); > + info->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "nand"); This driver is used by keystone devices too. So just changing the connection id will likely break them. Why do you need to change the connection id? Thanks, Sekhar
diff --git a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c index e770c97..1fcc986 100644 --- a/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c +++ b/arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c @@ -367,6 +367,11 @@ static struct clk aemif_clk = { .flags = ALWAYS_ENABLED, }; +static struct clk nand_clk = { + .name = "nand", + .parent = &aemif_clk, +}; + static struct clk usb11_clk = { .name = "usb11", .parent = &pll0_sysclk4, @@ -537,7 +542,7 @@ static struct clk_lookup da850_clks[] = { CLK("da830-mmc.0", NULL, &mmcsd0_clk), CLK("da830-mmc.1", NULL, &mmcsd1_clk), CLK("ti-aemif", NULL, &aemif_clk), - CLK(NULL, "aemif", &aemif_clk), + CLK(NULL, "nand", &nand_clk), CLK("ohci-da8xx", "usb11", &usb11_clk), CLK("musb-da8xx", "usb20", &usb20_clk), CLK("spi_davinci.0", NULL, &spi0_clk), diff --git a/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c b/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c index 27fa8b8..5857d06 100644 --- a/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c +++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c @@ -694,7 +694,7 @@ static int nand_davinci_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) ret = -EINVAL; - info->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "aemif"); + info->clk = devm_clk_get(&pdev->dev, "nand"); if (IS_ERR(info->clk)) { ret = PTR_ERR(info->clk); dev_dbg(&pdev->dev, "unable to get AEMIF clock, err %d\n", ret);
The aemif clock is added twice to the lookup table in da850.c. This breaks the children list of pll0_sysclk3 as we're using the same list links in struct clk. When calling clk_set_rate(), we get stuck in propagate_rate(). Create a separate clock for nand, inheriting the rate of the aemif clock and retrieve it in the davinci_nand module. Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bgolaszewski@baylibre.com> --- arch/arm/mach-davinci/da850.c | 7 ++++++- drivers/mtd/nand/davinci_nand.c | 2 +- 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) -- 2.9.3