Message ID | 20250212163720.1577876-1-mukesh.ojha@oss.qualcomm.com |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [v3] soc: qcom: pdr: Fix the potential deadlock | expand |
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 22:07:20 +0530, Mukesh Ojha wrote: > When some client process A call pdr_add_lookup() to add the look up for > the service and does schedule locator work, later a process B got a new > server packet indicating locator is up and call pdr_locator_new_server() > which eventually sets pdr->locator_init_complete to true which process A > sees and takes list lock and queries domain list but it will timeout due > to deadlock as the response will queued to the same qmi->wq and it is > ordered workqueue and process B is not able to complete new server > request work due to deadlock on list lock. > > [...] Applied, thanks! [1/1] soc: qcom: pdr: Fix the potential deadlock commit: 2eeb03ad9f42dfece63051be2400af487ddb96d2 Best regards,
diff --git a/drivers/soc/qcom/pdr_interface.c b/drivers/soc/qcom/pdr_interface.c index 328b6153b2be..71be378d2e43 100644 --- a/drivers/soc/qcom/pdr_interface.c +++ b/drivers/soc/qcom/pdr_interface.c @@ -75,7 +75,6 @@ static int pdr_locator_new_server(struct qmi_handle *qmi, { struct pdr_handle *pdr = container_of(qmi, struct pdr_handle, locator_hdl); - struct pdr_service *pds; mutex_lock(&pdr->lock); /* Create a local client port for QMI communication */ @@ -87,12 +86,7 @@ static int pdr_locator_new_server(struct qmi_handle *qmi, mutex_unlock(&pdr->lock); /* Service pending lookup requests */ - mutex_lock(&pdr->list_lock); - list_for_each_entry(pds, &pdr->lookups, node) { - if (pds->need_locator_lookup) - schedule_work(&pdr->locator_work); - } - mutex_unlock(&pdr->list_lock); + schedule_work(&pdr->locator_work); return 0; }