Message ID | 20230110134933.322794-1-o-takashi@sakamocchi.jp |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ALSA: firewire-lib: report extra delay of PCM runtime | expand |
On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 14:49:30 +0100, Takashi Sakamoto wrote: > > For reasons, all drivers in ALSA firewire stack have never reported extra > delay for the runtime of PCM substream. The main reason is that the > meaning of extra delay differs depending on driver design. Another > technical reason is that no kernel API was provided to know the current > hardware time. > > I realized that the extra delay is helpful to user space PCM applications > in the case of packet-oriented drivers since the drivers have a gap > between the current transmission cycle and the latest transmission cycle > to which the packet is processed (for PCM capture) or scheduled (for PCM > playback). The amount of PCM frames delivered during the gap is usually > invisible from the application as is in reported delay. > > A commit baa914cd81f5 ("firewire: add kernel API to access CYCLE_TIME > register") was already merged into Linux kernel v5.19 or later, and the > unit drivers can read hardware time and calculate the current isochronous > cycle. Moreover, a commit f0117128879b ("ALSA: firewire-lib: keep history > to process isochronous packet") enables to keep the recent history of > packets, including cycle count and data block count. > > It is ready at last. This patchset adds computation of the extra delay. > > Takashi Sakamoto (3): > ALSA: firewire-lib: move parameter for pcm frame multiplier from > context payload processing layer > ALSA: firewire-lib: obsolete return value from context payload > processing layer > ALSA: firewire-lib: compute extra delay for runtime of PCM substream Thanks, applied now. Takashi