@@ -317,6 +317,7 @@ static void test_pcm_time1(struct pcm_data *data,
bool pass = false, automatic = true;
snd_pcm_hw_params_t *hw_params;
snd_pcm_sw_params_t *sw_params;
+ bool skip = false;
snd_pcm_hw_params_alloca(&hw_params);
snd_pcm_sw_params_alloca(&sw_params);
@@ -391,7 +392,8 @@ static void test_pcm_time1(struct pcm_data *data,
goto __close;
}
if (rrate != rate) {
- snprintf(msg, sizeof(msg), "rate mismatch %ld != %ld", rate, rrate);
+ snprintf(msg, sizeof(msg), "rate unsupported %ld != %ld", rate, rrate);
+ skip = true;
goto __close;
}
rperiod_size = period_size;
@@ -487,11 +489,20 @@ static void test_pcm_time1(struct pcm_data *data,
msg[0] = '\0';
pass = true;
__close:
- ksft_test_result(pass, "%s.%d.%d.%d.%s%s%s\n",
- test->cfg_prefix,
- data->card, data->device, data->subdevice,
- snd_pcm_stream_name(data->stream),
- msg[0] ? " " : "", msg);
+ if (!skip) {
+ ksft_test_result(pass, "%s.%d.%d.%d.%s%s%s\n",
+ test->cfg_prefix,
+ data->card, data->device, data->subdevice,
+ snd_pcm_stream_name(data->stream),
+ msg[0] ? " " : "", msg);
+ } else {
+ ksft_test_result_skip("%s.%d.%d.%d.%s%s%s\n",
+ test->cfg_prefix,
+ data->card, data->device,
+ data->subdevice,
+ snd_pcm_stream_name(data->stream),
+ msg[0] ? " " : "", msg);
+ }
free(samples);
if (handle)
snd_pcm_close(handle);
If constraint selection gives us a sample rate other than the one that we asked for that isn't a failure, that is the device implementing sample rate constraints and advertising that it can't support whatever we asked for. Report such cases as a test skip rather than failure so we don't have false positives. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/alsa/pcm-test.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++------ 1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)