Message ID | 12036348.O9o76ZdvQC@kreacher |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | ACPI: Device enumeration rearrangements and parent field elimination | expand |
Hi Rafael, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> writes: > Hi All, > > There are still opportunities to clean up the ACPI support code and > this series is part of the effort in that direction. > > It makes changes without functional impact (AFAICS) to the core ACPI > code related to devices and to some of its users. > > Please refer to the patch changelogs for details. Other than the single typo I noticed in Patch 2, the changes look good! If it helps, Reviewed-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@bytedance.com> Thanks, Punit [...]
On Fri, Aug 12, 2022 at 3:11 PM Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@bytedance.com> wrote: > > Hi Rafael, > > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net> writes: > > > Hi All, > > > > There are still opportunities to clean up the ACPI support code and > > this series is part of the effort in that direction. > > > > It makes changes without functional impact (AFAICS) to the core ACPI > > code related to devices and to some of its users. > > > > Please refer to the patch changelogs for details. > > Other than the single typo I noticed in Patch 2, I've fixed that one while applying the patch. > the changes look good! > > If it helps, > > Reviewed-by: Punit Agrawal <punit.agrawal@bytedance.com> Thank you!