| Message ID | 20230130182225.2471414-7-sunilvl@ventanamicro.com |
|---|---|
| State | New |
| Headers | show |
| Series | Add basic ACPI support for RISC-V | expand |
On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:52:07PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote: > When CONFIG_PCI is enabled, ACPI core expects few arch > functions related to PCI. Add those functions so that > ACPI core gets build. These are levraged from arm64. > > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> > --- > arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 1 + > arch/riscv/kernel/pci.c | 173 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 174 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/pci.c > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/pci.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/pci.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..3388af3a67a0 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/pci.c > @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > +/* > + * Code borrowed from ARM64 > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2003 Anton Blanchard <anton@au.ibm.com>, IBM > + * Copyright (C) 2014 ARM Ltd. > + * Copyright (C) 2022-2023 Ventana Micro System Inc. > + */ > + > +#include <linux/acpi.h> > +#include <linux/init.h> > +#include <linux/io.h> > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > +#include <linux/mm.h> > +#include <linux/pci.h> > +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h> > +#include <linux/pci-ecam.h> > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI Quickly checking against ARM64, they do not wrap the read/write functions in this ifdef, so why do we need to do so? > +/* > + * raw_pci_read/write - Platform-specific PCI config space access. > + */ > +int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, > + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *val) > +{ > + struct pci_bus *b = pci_find_bus(domain, bus); > + > + if (!b) > + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; > + return b->ops->read(b, devfn, reg, len, val); A newline before the return would be appreciated by my eyes :) > +} > + > +int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, > + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 val) Also, both read and write functions here appear to have incorrect alignment on the second lines. > +{ > + struct pci_bus *b = pci_find_bus(domain, bus); > + > + if (!b) > + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; > + return b->ops->write(b, devfn, reg, len, val); > +} > + > + Extra newline here too, looks to be exactly where you deleted the numa stuff from arm64 ;) > +struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info { > + struct acpi_pci_root_info common; > + struct pci_config_window *cfg; /* config space mapping */ > +}; > + > +int acpi_pci_bus_find_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) > +{ > + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata; > + struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device(cfg->parent); > + struct acpi_pci_root *root = acpi_driver_data(adev); > + > + return root->segment; > +} > + > +static int pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) Rhetorical question perhaps, but what does "ci" mean? > +{ > + struct resource_entry *entry, *tmp; > + int status; > + > + status = acpi_pci_probe_root_resources(ci); > + resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ci->resources) { > + if (!(entry->res->flags & IORESOURCE_WINDOW)) > + resource_list_destroy_entry(entry); > + } > + return status; Perhaps that extra newline from above could migrate down to the line above the return here. > +} > + > +/* > + * Lookup the bus range for the domain in MCFG, and set up config space > + * mapping. > + */ > +static struct pci_config_window * > +pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(struct acpi_pci_root *root) This all fits on 1 line. > +{ > + struct device *dev = &root->device->dev; > + struct resource *bus_res = &root->secondary; > + u16 seg = root->segment; > + const struct pci_ecam_ops *ecam_ops; > + struct resource cfgres; > + struct acpi_device *adev; > + struct pci_config_window *cfg; > + int ret; > + > + ret = pci_mcfg_lookup(root, &cfgres, &ecam_ops); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(dev, "%04x:%pR ECAM region not found\n", seg, bus_res); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + adev = acpi_resource_consumer(&cfgres); > + if (adev) > + dev_info(dev, "ECAM area %pR reserved by %s\n", &cfgres, > + dev_name(&adev->dev)); > + else > + dev_warn(dev, FW_BUG "ECAM area %pR not reserved in ACPI namespace\n", > + &cfgres); > + > + cfg = pci_ecam_create(dev, &cfgres, bus_res, ecam_ops); > + if (IS_ERR(cfg)) { > + dev_err(dev, "%04x:%pR error %ld mapping ECAM\n", seg, bus_res, > + PTR_ERR(cfg)); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + return cfg; > +} > + > +/* release_info: free resources allocated by init_info */ The fact that you haven't picked a consistent comment style for this functions really bothers my OCD. Yes, it may be copy-paste from arm64, but since this is "new code" I don't think there's harm in at least *starting* with something that looks cohesive. > +static void pci_acpi_generic_release_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) > +{ > + struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri; > + > + ri = container_of(ci, struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info, common); > + pci_ecam_free(ri->cfg); > + kfree(ci->ops); > + kfree(ri); > +} > + > + Extra newline here. > +/* Interface called from ACPI code to setup PCI host controller */ > +struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root) > +{ > + struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri; > + struct pci_bus *bus, *child; > + struct acpi_pci_root_ops *root_ops; > + struct pci_host_bridge *host; > + > + ri = kzalloc(sizeof(*ri), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!ri) > + return NULL; > + > + root_ops = kzalloc(sizeof(*root_ops), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!root_ops) { > + kfree(ri); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + ri->cfg = pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(root); > + if (!ri->cfg) { > + kfree(ri); > + kfree(root_ops); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + root_ops->release_info = pci_acpi_generic_release_info; > + root_ops->prepare_resources = pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources; > + root_ops->pci_ops = (struct pci_ops *)&ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops; > + bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, root_ops, &ri->common, ri->cfg); > + if (!bus) > + return NULL; > + > + /* If we must preserve the resource configuration, claim now */ > + host = pci_find_host_bridge(bus); > + if (host->preserve_config) > + pci_bus_claim_resources(bus); > + > + /* > + * Assign whatever was left unassigned. If we didn't claim above, > + * this will reassign everything. > + */ > + pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources(bus); > + > + list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node) > + pcie_bus_configure_settings(child); > + > + return bus; > +} Anyways, this does look to be "leveraged from arm64" as you say and I only had minor nits to comment about... Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> Cheers, Conor.
On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:26:57PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:52:07PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote: > > When CONFIG_PCI is enabled, ACPI core expects few arch > > functions related to PCI. Add those functions so that > > ACPI core gets build. These are levraged from arm64. > > > > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> > > --- > > arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 1 + > > arch/riscv/kernel/pci.c | 173 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > > 2 files changed, 174 insertions(+) > > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/pci.c > > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/pci.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/pci.c > > new file mode 100644 > > index 000000000000..3388af3a67a0 > > --- /dev/null > > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/pci.c > > @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ > > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > > +/* > > + * Code borrowed from ARM64 > > + * > > + * Copyright (C) 2003 Anton Blanchard <anton@au.ibm.com>, IBM > > + * Copyright (C) 2014 ARM Ltd. > > + * Copyright (C) 2022-2023 Ventana Micro System Inc. > > + */ > > + > > +#include <linux/acpi.h> > > +#include <linux/init.h> > > +#include <linux/io.h> > > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > > +#include <linux/mm.h> > > +#include <linux/pci.h> > > +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h> > > +#include <linux/pci-ecam.h> > > + > > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > > Quickly checking against ARM64, they do not wrap the read/write > functions in this ifdef, so why do we need to do so? > I didn't find any callers other than ACPI. But let me keep them outside so that we are consistent. > > +/* > > + * raw_pci_read/write - Platform-specific PCI config space access. > > + */ > > +int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, > > + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *val) > > +{ > > + struct pci_bus *b = pci_find_bus(domain, bus); > > + > > + if (!b) > > + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; > > + return b->ops->read(b, devfn, reg, len, val); > > A newline before the return would be appreciated by my eyes :) > Okay. > > +} > > + > > +int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, > > + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 val) > > Also, both read and write functions here appear to have incorrect > alignment on the second lines. > Okay. > > +{ > > + struct pci_bus *b = pci_find_bus(domain, bus); > > + > > + if (!b) > > + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; > > + return b->ops->write(b, devfn, reg, len, val); > > +} > > + > > + > > Extra newline here too, looks to be exactly where you deleted the numa > stuff from arm64 ;) > Okay. > > +struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info { > > + struct acpi_pci_root_info common; > > + struct pci_config_window *cfg; /* config space mapping */ > > +}; > > + > > +int acpi_pci_bus_find_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) > > +{ > > + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata; > > + struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device(cfg->parent); > > + struct acpi_pci_root *root = acpi_driver_data(adev); > > + > > + return root->segment; > > +} > > + > > +static int pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) > > Rhetorical question perhaps, but what does "ci" mean? > I don't know either :-). I guess since there is one more generic ri, this is named as ci. > > +{ > > + struct resource_entry *entry, *tmp; > > + int status; > > + > > + status = acpi_pci_probe_root_resources(ci); > > + resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ci->resources) { > > + if (!(entry->res->flags & IORESOURCE_WINDOW)) > > + resource_list_destroy_entry(entry); > > + } > > + return status; > > Perhaps that extra newline from above could migrate down to the line > above the return here. > Okay. > > +} > > + > > +/* > > + * Lookup the bus range for the domain in MCFG, and set up config space > > + * mapping. > > + */ > > +static struct pci_config_window * > > +pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(struct acpi_pci_root *root) > > This all fits on 1 line. > It actually goes beyond 80 characters, right? > > +{ > > + struct device *dev = &root->device->dev; > > + struct resource *bus_res = &root->secondary; > > + u16 seg = root->segment; > > + const struct pci_ecam_ops *ecam_ops; > > + struct resource cfgres; > > + struct acpi_device *adev; > > + struct pci_config_window *cfg; > > + int ret; > > + > > + ret = pci_mcfg_lookup(root, &cfgres, &ecam_ops); > > + if (ret) { > > + dev_err(dev, "%04x:%pR ECAM region not found\n", seg, bus_res); > > + return NULL; > > + } > > + > > + adev = acpi_resource_consumer(&cfgres); > > + if (adev) > > + dev_info(dev, "ECAM area %pR reserved by %s\n", &cfgres, > > + dev_name(&adev->dev)); > > + else > > + dev_warn(dev, FW_BUG "ECAM area %pR not reserved in ACPI namespace\n", > > + &cfgres); > > + > > + cfg = pci_ecam_create(dev, &cfgres, bus_res, ecam_ops); > > + if (IS_ERR(cfg)) { > > + dev_err(dev, "%04x:%pR error %ld mapping ECAM\n", seg, bus_res, > > + PTR_ERR(cfg)); > > + return NULL; > > + } > > + > > + return cfg; > > +} > > + > > +/* release_info: free resources allocated by init_info */ > > The fact that you haven't picked a consistent comment style for this > functions really bothers my OCD. Yes, it may be copy-paste from arm64, > but since this is "new code" I don't think there's harm in at least > *starting* with something that looks cohesive. > Agree. Will try to fix them in the next revision. > > +static void pci_acpi_generic_release_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) > > +{ > > + struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri; > > + > > + ri = container_of(ci, struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info, common); > > + pci_ecam_free(ri->cfg); > > + kfree(ci->ops); > > + kfree(ri); > > +} > > + > > + > > Extra newline here. > Okay. > > +/* Interface called from ACPI code to setup PCI host controller */ > > +struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root) > > +{ > > + struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri; > > + struct pci_bus *bus, *child; > > + struct acpi_pci_root_ops *root_ops; > > + struct pci_host_bridge *host; > > + > > + ri = kzalloc(sizeof(*ri), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!ri) > > + return NULL; > > + > > + root_ops = kzalloc(sizeof(*root_ops), GFP_KERNEL); > > + if (!root_ops) { > > + kfree(ri); > > + return NULL; > > + } > > + > > + ri->cfg = pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(root); > > + if (!ri->cfg) { > > + kfree(ri); > > + kfree(root_ops); > > + return NULL; > > + } > > + > > + root_ops->release_info = pci_acpi_generic_release_info; > > + root_ops->prepare_resources = pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources; > > + root_ops->pci_ops = (struct pci_ops *)&ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops; > > + bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, root_ops, &ri->common, ri->cfg); > > + if (!bus) > > + return NULL; > > + > > + /* If we must preserve the resource configuration, claim now */ > > + host = pci_find_host_bridge(bus); > > + if (host->preserve_config) > > + pci_bus_claim_resources(bus); > > + > > + /* > > + * Assign whatever was left unassigned. If we didn't claim above, > > + * this will reassign everything. > > + */ > > + pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources(bus); > > + > > + list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node) > > + pcie_bus_configure_settings(child); > > + > > + return bus; > > +} > > Anyways, this does look to be "leveraged from arm64" as you say and I > only had minor nits to comment about... > Reviewed-by: Conor Dooley <conor.dooley@microchip.com> > Thanks! Sunil
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 08:53:01PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote: > On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 09:26:57PM +0000, Conor Dooley wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:52:07PM +0530, Sunil V L wrote: > > > +/* > > > + * Lookup the bus range for the domain in MCFG, and set up config space > > > + * mapping. > > > + */ > > > +static struct pci_config_window * > > > +pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(struct acpi_pci_root *root) > > > > This all fits on 1 line. > > > It actually goes beyond 80 characters, right? 100 chars is the limit :)
On 30 Jan 2023, at 18:22, Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> wrote: > > When CONFIG_PCI is enabled, ACPI core expects few arch > functions related to PCI. Add those functions so that > ACPI core gets build. These are levraged from arm64. Presumably this is pretty generic and applies to anything without x86 weirdness. Copying all this supposedly architecture specific code that’s really generic seems like bad practice to me as an outsider. Should this not be unifying the two in a shared location as has been done for other subsystems? Jess > Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> > --- > arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 1 + > arch/riscv/kernel/pci.c | 173 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 2 files changed, 174 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/pci.c > > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile > index f979dc8cf47d..e9d37639751d 100644 > --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile > @@ -92,3 +92,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT) += compat_signal.o > obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT) += compat_vdso/ > > obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += acpi.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI) += pci.o > diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/pci.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/pci.c > new file mode 100644 > index 000000000000..3388af3a67a0 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/pci.c > @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ > +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only > +/* > + * Code borrowed from ARM64 > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2003 Anton Blanchard <anton@au.ibm.com>, IBM > + * Copyright (C) 2014 ARM Ltd. > + * Copyright (C) 2022-2023 Ventana Micro System Inc. > + */ > + > +#include <linux/acpi.h> > +#include <linux/init.h> > +#include <linux/io.h> > +#include <linux/kernel.h> > +#include <linux/mm.h> > +#include <linux/pci.h> > +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h> > +#include <linux/pci-ecam.h> > + > +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI > + > +/* > + * raw_pci_read/write - Platform-specific PCI config space access. > + */ > +int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, > + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *val) > +{ > + struct pci_bus *b = pci_find_bus(domain, bus); > + > + if (!b) > + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; > + return b->ops->read(b, devfn, reg, len, val); > +} > + > +int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, > + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 val) > +{ > + struct pci_bus *b = pci_find_bus(domain, bus); > + > + if (!b) > + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; > + return b->ops->write(b, devfn, reg, len, val); > +} > + > + > +struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info { > + struct acpi_pci_root_info common; > + struct pci_config_window *cfg; /* config space mapping */ > +}; > + > +int acpi_pci_bus_find_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) > +{ > + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata; > + struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device(cfg->parent); > + struct acpi_pci_root *root = acpi_driver_data(adev); > + > + return root->segment; > +} > + > +static int pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) > +{ > + struct resource_entry *entry, *tmp; > + int status; > + > + status = acpi_pci_probe_root_resources(ci); > + resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ci->resources) { > + if (!(entry->res->flags & IORESOURCE_WINDOW)) > + resource_list_destroy_entry(entry); > + } > + return status; > +} > + > +/* > + * Lookup the bus range for the domain in MCFG, and set up config space > + * mapping. > + */ > +static struct pci_config_window * > +pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(struct acpi_pci_root *root) > +{ > + struct device *dev = &root->device->dev; > + struct resource *bus_res = &root->secondary; > + u16 seg = root->segment; > + const struct pci_ecam_ops *ecam_ops; > + struct resource cfgres; > + struct acpi_device *adev; > + struct pci_config_window *cfg; > + int ret; > + > + ret = pci_mcfg_lookup(root, &cfgres, &ecam_ops); > + if (ret) { > + dev_err(dev, "%04x:%pR ECAM region not found\n", seg, bus_res); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + adev = acpi_resource_consumer(&cfgres); > + if (adev) > + dev_info(dev, "ECAM area %pR reserved by %s\n", &cfgres, > + dev_name(&adev->dev)); > + else > + dev_warn(dev, FW_BUG "ECAM area %pR not reserved in ACPI namespace\n", > + &cfgres); > + > + cfg = pci_ecam_create(dev, &cfgres, bus_res, ecam_ops); > + if (IS_ERR(cfg)) { > + dev_err(dev, "%04x:%pR error %ld mapping ECAM\n", seg, bus_res, > + PTR_ERR(cfg)); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + return cfg; > +} > + > +/* release_info: free resources allocated by init_info */ > +static void pci_acpi_generic_release_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) > +{ > + struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri; > + > + ri = container_of(ci, struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info, common); > + pci_ecam_free(ri->cfg); > + kfree(ci->ops); > + kfree(ri); > +} > + > + > +/* Interface called from ACPI code to setup PCI host controller */ > +struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root) > +{ > + struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri; > + struct pci_bus *bus, *child; > + struct acpi_pci_root_ops *root_ops; > + struct pci_host_bridge *host; > + > + ri = kzalloc(sizeof(*ri), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!ri) > + return NULL; > + > + root_ops = kzalloc(sizeof(*root_ops), GFP_KERNEL); > + if (!root_ops) { > + kfree(ri); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + ri->cfg = pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(root); > + if (!ri->cfg) { > + kfree(ri); > + kfree(root_ops); > + return NULL; > + } > + > + root_ops->release_info = pci_acpi_generic_release_info; > + root_ops->prepare_resources = pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources; > + root_ops->pci_ops = (struct pci_ops *)&ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops; > + bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, root_ops, &ri->common, ri->cfg); > + if (!bus) > + return NULL; > + > + /* If we must preserve the resource configuration, claim now */ > + host = pci_find_host_bridge(bus); > + if (host->preserve_config) > + pci_bus_claim_resources(bus); > + > + /* > + * Assign whatever was left unassigned. If we didn't claim above, > + * this will reassign everything. > + */ > + pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources(bus); > + > + list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node) > + pcie_bus_configure_settings(child); > + > + return bus; > +} > + > +#endif > -- > 2.38.0 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-riscv mailing list > linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org > http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv
On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 05:26:13PM +0000, Jessica Clarke wrote: > On 30 Jan 2023, at 18:22, Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> wrote: > > > > When CONFIG_PCI is enabled, ACPI core expects few arch > > functions related to PCI. Add those functions so that > > ACPI core gets build. These are levraged from arm64. > > Presumably this is pretty generic and applies to anything without x86 > weirdness. Copying all this supposedly architecture specific code > that’s really generic seems like bad practice to me as an outsider. > Should this not be unifying the two in a shared location as has been > done for other subsystems? Make sense. Let me add these functions in a common location pci-acpi.c for RISC-V. Other architectures can migrate to this in future. Thanks, Sunil
diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile index f979dc8cf47d..e9d37639751d 100644 --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile @@ -92,3 +92,4 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT) += compat_signal.o obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT) += compat_vdso/ obj-$(CONFIG_ACPI) += acpi.o +obj-$(CONFIG_PCI) += pci.o diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/pci.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/pci.c new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..3388af3a67a0 --- /dev/null +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/pci.c @@ -0,0 +1,173 @@ +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only +/* + * Code borrowed from ARM64 + * + * Copyright (C) 2003 Anton Blanchard <anton@au.ibm.com>, IBM + * Copyright (C) 2014 ARM Ltd. + * Copyright (C) 2022-2023 Ventana Micro System Inc. + */ + +#include <linux/acpi.h> +#include <linux/init.h> +#include <linux/io.h> +#include <linux/kernel.h> +#include <linux/mm.h> +#include <linux/pci.h> +#include <linux/pci-acpi.h> +#include <linux/pci-ecam.h> + +#ifdef CONFIG_ACPI + +/* + * raw_pci_read/write - Platform-specific PCI config space access. + */ +int raw_pci_read(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 *val) +{ + struct pci_bus *b = pci_find_bus(domain, bus); + + if (!b) + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; + return b->ops->read(b, devfn, reg, len, val); +} + +int raw_pci_write(unsigned int domain, unsigned int bus, + unsigned int devfn, int reg, int len, u32 val) +{ + struct pci_bus *b = pci_find_bus(domain, bus); + + if (!b) + return PCIBIOS_DEVICE_NOT_FOUND; + return b->ops->write(b, devfn, reg, len, val); +} + + +struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info { + struct acpi_pci_root_info common; + struct pci_config_window *cfg; /* config space mapping */ +}; + +int acpi_pci_bus_find_domain_nr(struct pci_bus *bus) +{ + struct pci_config_window *cfg = bus->sysdata; + struct acpi_device *adev = to_acpi_device(cfg->parent); + struct acpi_pci_root *root = acpi_driver_data(adev); + + return root->segment; +} + +static int pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) +{ + struct resource_entry *entry, *tmp; + int status; + + status = acpi_pci_probe_root_resources(ci); + resource_list_for_each_entry_safe(entry, tmp, &ci->resources) { + if (!(entry->res->flags & IORESOURCE_WINDOW)) + resource_list_destroy_entry(entry); + } + return status; +} + +/* + * Lookup the bus range for the domain in MCFG, and set up config space + * mapping. + */ +static struct pci_config_window * +pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(struct acpi_pci_root *root) +{ + struct device *dev = &root->device->dev; + struct resource *bus_res = &root->secondary; + u16 seg = root->segment; + const struct pci_ecam_ops *ecam_ops; + struct resource cfgres; + struct acpi_device *adev; + struct pci_config_window *cfg; + int ret; + + ret = pci_mcfg_lookup(root, &cfgres, &ecam_ops); + if (ret) { + dev_err(dev, "%04x:%pR ECAM region not found\n", seg, bus_res); + return NULL; + } + + adev = acpi_resource_consumer(&cfgres); + if (adev) + dev_info(dev, "ECAM area %pR reserved by %s\n", &cfgres, + dev_name(&adev->dev)); + else + dev_warn(dev, FW_BUG "ECAM area %pR not reserved in ACPI namespace\n", + &cfgres); + + cfg = pci_ecam_create(dev, &cfgres, bus_res, ecam_ops); + if (IS_ERR(cfg)) { + dev_err(dev, "%04x:%pR error %ld mapping ECAM\n", seg, bus_res, + PTR_ERR(cfg)); + return NULL; + } + + return cfg; +} + +/* release_info: free resources allocated by init_info */ +static void pci_acpi_generic_release_info(struct acpi_pci_root_info *ci) +{ + struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri; + + ri = container_of(ci, struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info, common); + pci_ecam_free(ri->cfg); + kfree(ci->ops); + kfree(ri); +} + + +/* Interface called from ACPI code to setup PCI host controller */ +struct pci_bus *pci_acpi_scan_root(struct acpi_pci_root *root) +{ + struct acpi_pci_generic_root_info *ri; + struct pci_bus *bus, *child; + struct acpi_pci_root_ops *root_ops; + struct pci_host_bridge *host; + + ri = kzalloc(sizeof(*ri), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!ri) + return NULL; + + root_ops = kzalloc(sizeof(*root_ops), GFP_KERNEL); + if (!root_ops) { + kfree(ri); + return NULL; + } + + ri->cfg = pci_acpi_setup_ecam_mapping(root); + if (!ri->cfg) { + kfree(ri); + kfree(root_ops); + return NULL; + } + + root_ops->release_info = pci_acpi_generic_release_info; + root_ops->prepare_resources = pci_acpi_root_prepare_resources; + root_ops->pci_ops = (struct pci_ops *)&ri->cfg->ops->pci_ops; + bus = acpi_pci_root_create(root, root_ops, &ri->common, ri->cfg); + if (!bus) + return NULL; + + /* If we must preserve the resource configuration, claim now */ + host = pci_find_host_bridge(bus); + if (host->preserve_config) + pci_bus_claim_resources(bus); + + /* + * Assign whatever was left unassigned. If we didn't claim above, + * this will reassign everything. + */ + pci_assign_unassigned_root_bus_resources(bus); + + list_for_each_entry(child, &bus->children, node) + pcie_bus_configure_settings(child); + + return bus; +} + +#endif
When CONFIG_PCI is enabled, ACPI core expects few arch functions related to PCI. Add those functions so that ACPI core gets build. These are levraged from arm64. Signed-off-by: Sunil V L <sunilvl@ventanamicro.com> --- arch/riscv/kernel/Makefile | 1 + arch/riscv/kernel/pci.c | 173 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 174 insertions(+) create mode 100644 arch/riscv/kernel/pci.c