Message ID | 20250610-b4-sm8750-display-v6-0-ee633e3ddbff@linaro.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | drm/msm: Add support for SM8750 | expand |
On 13/06/2025 17:02, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On 13/06/2025 15:55, Dmitry Baryshkov wrote: >>> >>> @@ -361,24 +373,47 @@ static int dsi_pll_7nm_lock_status(struct dsi_pll_7nm *pll) >>> >>> static void dsi_pll_disable_pll_bias(struct dsi_pll_7nm *pll) >>> { >>> + unsigned long flags; >>> u32 data; >>> >>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&pll->pll_enable_lock, flags); >>> + --pll->pll_enable_cnt; >>> + if (pll->pll_enable_cnt < 0) { >>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pll->pll_enable_lock, flags); >>> + DRM_DEV_ERROR_RATELIMITED(&pll->phy->pdev->dev, >>> + "bug: imbalance in disabling PLL bias\n"); >>> + return; >>> + } else if (pll->pll_enable_cnt > 0) { >>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pll->pll_enable_lock, flags); >>> + return; >>> + } /* else: == 0 */ >>> + >>> data = readl(pll->phy->base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_CMN_CTRL_0); >>> data &= ~DSI_7nm_PHY_CMN_CTRL_0_PLL_SHUTDOWNB; >>> writel(0, pll->phy->pll_base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_PLL_SYSTEM_MUXES); >>> writel(data, pll->phy->base + REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_CMN_CTRL_0); >>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&pll->pll_enable_lock, flags); >>> ndelay(250); >> >> What is this ndelay protecting? Is is to let the hardware to wind down >> correctly? I'm worried about dsi_pll_disable_pll_bias() beng followed up >> by dsi_pll_enable_pll_bias() in another thread, which would mean that >> corresponding writes to the REG_DSI_7nm_PHY_CMN_CTRL_0 can come up >> without any delay between them. >> > > Great question, but why do you ask me? The code was there already and > MSM DRM drivers are not something I know and could provide context about. Because it's you who are changing the code as you've faced the issue with recalc_rate. > > > Best regards, > Krzysztof