Message ID | 20210109135112.147759-2-angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org |
---|---|
State | Accepted |
Commit | 5c191fef4ce2fc4310d8174bd3861474919201e4 |
Headers | show |
Series | Clock fixes for DSI 10nm PLL | expand |
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_10nm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_10nm.c index 6ac04fc303f5..2c1fcf092ab8 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_10nm.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_10nm.c @@ -172,9 +172,7 @@ static void dsi_pll_calc_dec_frac(struct dsi_pll_10nm *pll) multiplier = 1 << config->frac_bits; dec_multiple = div_u64(pll_freq * multiplier, divider); - div_u64_rem(dec_multiple, multiplier, &frac); - - dec = div_u64(dec_multiple, multiplier); + dec = div_u64_rem(dec_multiple, multiplier, &frac); if (pll_freq <= 1900000000UL) regs->pll_prop_gain_rate = 8;
In function dsi_pll_calc_dec_frac we are calculating the decimal div start parameter by dividing the decimal multiple by the fractional multiplier: the remainder of that operation is stored to then get programmed to the fractional divider registers of the PLL. It's useless to call div_u64_rem to get the remainder and *then* call div_u64 to get the division result, as the first is already giving that result: let's fix it by just caring about the result of div_u64_rem. Signed-off-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <angelogioacchino.delregno@somainline.org> --- drivers/gpu/drm/msm/dsi/pll/dsi_pll_10nm.c | 4 +--- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)