| Message ID | 20220328143035.519909-2-vkoul@kernel.org |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | [1/6] arm64: dts: qcom: sm8450: rename interconnect nodes | expand |
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi index 934e29b9e153..b0128d115e7a 100644 --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi @@ -252,13 +252,13 @@ scm: scm { }; }; - clk_virt: interconnect@0 { + clk_virt: interconnect-0 { compatible = "qcom,sm8450-clk-virt"; #interconnect-cells = <2>; qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>; }; - mc_virt: interconnect@1 { + mc_virt: interconnect-1 { compatible = "qcom,sm8450-mc-virt"; #interconnect-cells = <2>; qcom,bcm-voters = <&apps_bcm_voter>;
clk-virt and mc-virt interconnect nodes were named interconnect@0 and interconnect@1. That is incorrect as we don't have unit addresses 0/1 for these node. This causes warning: arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:255.27-259.4: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /interconnect@0: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:261.26-265.4: Warning (unit_address_vs_reg): /interconnect@1: node has a unit name, but no reg or ranges property arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi:255.27-259.4: Warning (unique_unit_address_if_enabled): /interconnect@0: duplicate unit-address (also used in node /soc@0) Rename the nodes to interconnect-0 and interconnect-1 to fix the warning. Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org> Suggested-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> --- arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8450.dtsi | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)