mbox series

[0/4] arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64: Add PWM nodes

Message ID 20210719085402.28569-1-lokeshvutla@ti.com
Headers show
Series arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64: Add PWM nodes | expand

Message

Lokesh Vutla July 19, 2021, 8:53 a.m. UTC
Add epwm and ecap nodes for AM64 boards.

Lokesh Vutla (4):
  arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64-main: Add epwm nodes
  arm64: dts: ti: k3-am64-main: Add ecap pwm nodes
  arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-sk: Add ecap0 node
  arm64: dts: ti: k3-am642-evm: Add ecap0 node

 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am64-main.dtsi | 114 +++++++++++++++++++++++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-evm.dts  |  12 +++
 arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sk.dts   |  12 +++
 3 files changed, 138 insertions(+)

Comments

Lokesh Vutla July 20, 2021, 5:16 a.m. UTC | #1
On 19/07/21 8:53 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 14:24-20210719, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

>> ecap0 can be configured to use pad ECAP0_IN_APWM_OUT (D18) which has a

>> signal connected to Pin 1 of J3. Add support for adding this pinmux so

>> that pwm can be observed on pin 1 of Header J3

>>

>> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>

>> Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>

>> ---

>>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sk.dts | 12 ++++++++++++

>>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

>>

>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sk.dts

>> index d3aa2901e6fd..eb0d10e6e787 100644

>> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sk.dts

>> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sk.dts

>> @@ -210,6 +210,12 @@ AM64X_IOPAD(0x0028, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (M17) OSPI0_D7 */

>>  			AM64X_IOPAD(0x0008, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (N19) OSPI0_DQS */

>>  		>;

>>  	};

>> +

>> +	main_ecap0_pins_default: main-ecap0-pins-default {

>> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <

>> +			AM64X_IOPAD(0x0270, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (D18) ECAP0_IN_APWM_OUT */

>> +		>;

>> +	};

>>  };

>>  

>>  &mcu_uart0 {

>> @@ -453,3 +459,9 @@ &pcie0_rc {

>>  &pcie0_ep {

>>  	status = "disabled";

>>  };

>> +

>> +&ecap0 {

>> +	/* PWM is available on Pin 1 of header J3 */

>> +	pinctrl-names = "default";

>> +	pinctrl-0 = <&main_ecap0_pins_default>;

>> +};

>> -- 

>> 2.30.0

>>

> 

> 

> Do the other ecap and pwm nodes need to be disabled since they may not

> be pinned out?


Sure, Ill mark other ecap and epwm nodes as disabled. After looking at
schematics, epwm4 and 5 is pinned out on RPI header. But the header will most
likely be used for other use-cases. Shall I mark epwm4 and epwm5 disabled as
well with a comment with this information?

Thanks and regards,
Lokesh

>
Nishanth Menon July 20, 2021, 12:05 p.m. UTC | #2
On 10:46-20210720, Lokesh Vutla wrote:
> 

> 

> On 19/07/21 8:53 pm, Nishanth Menon wrote:

> > On 14:24-20210719, Lokesh Vutla wrote:

> >> ecap0 can be configured to use pad ECAP0_IN_APWM_OUT (D18) which has a

> >> signal connected to Pin 1 of J3. Add support for adding this pinmux so

> >> that pwm can be observed on pin 1 of Header J3

> >>

> >> Signed-off-by: Lokesh Vutla <lokeshvutla@ti.com>

> >> Signed-off-by: Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>

> >> ---

> >>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sk.dts | 12 ++++++++++++

> >>  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)

> >>

> >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sk.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sk.dts

> >> index d3aa2901e6fd..eb0d10e6e787 100644

> >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sk.dts

> >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/ti/k3-am642-sk.dts

> >> @@ -210,6 +210,12 @@ AM64X_IOPAD(0x0028, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (M17) OSPI0_D7 */

> >>  			AM64X_IOPAD(0x0008, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (N19) OSPI0_DQS */

> >>  		>;

> >>  	};

> >> +

> >> +	main_ecap0_pins_default: main-ecap0-pins-default {

> >> +		pinctrl-single,pins = <

> >> +			AM64X_IOPAD(0x0270, PIN_INPUT, 0) /* (D18) ECAP0_IN_APWM_OUT */

> >> +		>;

> >> +	};

> >>  };

> >>  

> >>  &mcu_uart0 {

> >> @@ -453,3 +459,9 @@ &pcie0_rc {

> >>  &pcie0_ep {

> >>  	status = "disabled";

> >>  };

> >> +

> >> +&ecap0 {

> >> +	/* PWM is available on Pin 1 of header J3 */

> >> +	pinctrl-names = "default";

> >> +	pinctrl-0 = <&main_ecap0_pins_default>;

> >> +};

> >> -- 

> >> 2.30.0

> >>

> > 

> > 

> > Do the other ecap and pwm nodes need to be disabled since they may not

> > be pinned out?

> 

> Sure, Ill mark other ecap and epwm nodes as disabled. After looking at

> schematics, epwm4 and 5 is pinned out on RPI header. But the header will most

> likely be used for other use-cases. Shall I mark epwm4 and epwm5 disabled as

> well with a comment with this information?



Yes, please. Thanks.

-- 
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
Key (0xDDB5849D1736249D) / Fingerprint: F8A2 8693 54EB 8232 17A3  1A34 DDB5 849D 1736 249D