Message ID | 20220511195452.871897-1-nfraprado@collabora.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Mediatek SCP dt-binding tweaks | expand |
On 11/05/2022 21:54, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote: Thank you for your patch. There is something to discuss/improve. > > -if: > - properties: > - compatible: > - enum: > - - mediatek,mt8183-scp > - - mediatek,mt8192-scp > -then: > - required: > - - clocks > - - clock-names > +allOf: > + - if: > + properties: > + compatible: > + enum: > + - mediatek,mt8183-scp > + - mediatek,mt8192-scp > + then: > + required: > + - clocks > + - clock-names > + > + - if: > + properties: > + compatible: > + enum: > + - mediatek,mt8183-scp > + - mediatek,mt8186-scp > + then: > + properties: > + reg: > + maxItems: 2 > + reg-names: > + maxItems: 2 Isn't l1tcm required on mt819x? Now it is left optional. Best regards, Krzysztof
On 11/05/2022 21:54, Nícolas F. R. A. Prado wrote: > Commit ca23ecfdbd44 ("remoteproc/mediatek: support L1TCM") added support > for the l1tcm memory region on the MT8192 SCP, adding a new da_to_va > callback that handles l1tcm while keeping the old one for > back-compatibility with MT8183. However, since the mt8192 compatible was > missing from the dt-binding, the accompanying dt-binding commit > 503c64cc42f1 ("dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: add L1TCM memory region") > mistakenly added this reg as if it were for mt8183. And later > it became common to all platforms as their compatibles were added. > > Fix the dt-binding so that the l1tcm reg can be present only on the > supported platforms: mt8192 and mt8195. > > Fixes: 503c64cc42f1 ("dt-bindings: remoteproc: mediatek: add L1TCM memory region") > Signed-off-by: Nícolas F. R. A. Prado <nfraprado@collabora.com> > > --- > > Changes in v5: > - Made l1tcm optional for mt8192/mt8195 > - Greatly simplified the constraints override in the if:then: > - Updated commit message > Reviewed-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org> Best regards, Krzysztof