Message ID | 20220814173656.11856-1-samuel@sholland.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | nvmem: Support non-stride-aligned NVMEM cell data | expand |
在 2022-08-14星期日的 12:36 -0500,Samuel Holland写道: > Now that the SRAM readout code is fixed by using 32-bit accesses, it > always returns the same values as register readout, so the A64 > variant > no longer needs the workaround. This makes the D1 variant structure > redundant, so remove it. Is this really tested on A64? > > Signed-off-by: Samuel Holland <samuel@sholland.org> > --- > > drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c | 8 +------- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 7 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c b/drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c > index 92dfe4cb10e3..a970f1741cc6 100644 > --- a/drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c > +++ b/drivers/nvmem/sunxi_sid.c > @@ -197,15 +197,9 @@ static const struct sunxi_sid_cfg sun8i_h3_cfg = > { > .need_register_readout = true, > }; > > -static const struct sunxi_sid_cfg sun20i_d1_cfg = { > - .value_offset = 0x200, > - .size = 0x100, > -}; > - > static const struct sunxi_sid_cfg sun50i_a64_cfg = { > .value_offset = 0x200, > .size = 0x100, > - .need_register_readout = true, > }; > > static const struct sunxi_sid_cfg sun50i_h6_cfg = { > @@ -218,7 +212,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id > sunxi_sid_of_match[] = { > { .compatible = "allwinner,sun7i-a20-sid", .data = > &sun7i_a20_cfg }, > { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-a83t-sid", .data = > &sun50i_a64_cfg }, > { .compatible = "allwinner,sun8i-h3-sid", .data = > &sun8i_h3_cfg }, > - { .compatible = "allwinner,sun20i-d1-sid", .data = > &sun20i_d1_cfg }, > + { .compatible = "allwinner,sun20i-d1-sid", .data = > &sun50i_a64_cfg }, > { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-a64-sid", .data = > &sun50i_a64_cfg }, > { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h5-sid", .data = > &sun50i_a64_cfg }, > { .compatible = "allwinner,sun50i-h6-sid", .data = > &sun50i_h6_cfg },
Hi Icenowy, On 8/15/22 3:37 AM, Icenowy Zheng wrote: > 在 2022-08-14星期日的 12:36 -0500,Samuel Holland写道: >> Now that the SRAM readout code is fixed by using 32-bit accesses, it >> always returns the same values as register readout, so the A64 >> variant >> no longer needs the workaround. This makes the D1 variant structure >> redundant, so remove it. > > Is this really tested on A64? Yes, I tested this on a Pine A64-LTS. You can see the difference easily with md.{b,w,l,q} in the U-Boot shell. I verified that all three of the following are identical: - NVMEM exported to sysfs with the register readout method - NVMEM exported to sysfs with this patch series applied - SRAM dump made with md.l in the U-Boot shell Regards, Samuel