diff mbox series

[v3,15/15] remoteproc: Refactor rproc delete and cdev release path

Message ID 20201126210642.897302-16-mathieu.poirier@linaro.org
State New
Headers show
Series remoteproc: Add support for detaching from rproc | expand

Commit Message

Mathieu Poirier Nov. 26, 2020, 9:06 p.m. UTC
Refactor function rproc_del() and rproc_cdev_release() to take
into account the policy specified in the device tree.

Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>

---
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c | 13 +++++++++++-
 drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 include/linux/remoteproc.h           |  4 ++++
 3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

-- 
2.25.1

Comments

Arnaud POULIQUEN Dec. 9, 2020, 10:13 a.m. UTC | #1
On 11/26/20 10:06 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
> Refactor function rproc_del() and rproc_cdev_release() to take

> into account the policy specified in the device tree.

> 

> Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>

> ---

>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c | 13 +++++++++++-

>  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--

>  include/linux/remoteproc.h           |  4 ++++

>  3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

> 

> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c

> index f7645f289563..3dfe555dfc07 100644

> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c

> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c

> @@ -88,7 +88,18 @@ static int rproc_cdev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)

>  {

>  	struct rproc *rproc = container_of(inode->i_cdev, struct rproc, cdev);

>  

> -	if (rproc->cdev_put_on_release && rproc->state == RPROC_RUNNING)

> +	if (!rproc->cdev_put_on_release)

> +		return 0;

> +

> +	/*

> +	 * The application has crashed or is releasing its file handle.  Detach

> +	 * or shutdown the remote processor based on the policy specified in the

> +	 * DT.  No need to check rproc->state right away, it will be done

> +	 * in either rproc_detach() or rproc_shutdown().

> +	 */

> +	if (rproc->autonomous_on_core_shutdown)

> +		rproc_detach(rproc);

> +	else

>  		rproc_shutdown(rproc);


A reason to not propagate the return of functions?

>  

>  	return 0;

> diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c

> index 3d7d245edc4e..1a170103bf27 100644

> --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c

> +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c

> @@ -2294,6 +2294,22 @@ static int rproc_alloc_ops(struct rproc *rproc, const struct rproc_ops *ops)

>  	return 0;

>  }

>  

> +static void rproc_set_automation_flags(struct rproc *rproc)

> +{

> +	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;

> +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;

> +	bool core_shutdown;

> +

> +	/*

> +	 * When function rproc_cdev_release() or rproc_del() are called and

> +	 * the remote processor has been attached to, it will be detached from

> +	 * (rather than turned off) if "autonomous-on-core-shutdown is specified

> +	 * in the DT.

> +	 */

> +	core_shutdown = of_property_read_bool(np, "autonomous-on-core-shutdown");

> +	rproc->autonomous_on_core_shutdown = core_shutdown;

> +}

> +

>  /**

>   * rproc_alloc() - allocate a remote processor handle

>   * @dev: the underlying device

> @@ -2352,6 +2368,8 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,

>  	if (rproc_alloc_ops(rproc, ops))

>  		goto put_device;

>  

> +	rproc_set_automation_flags(rproc);

> +

>  	/* Assign a unique device index and name */

>  	rproc->index = ida_simple_get(&rproc_dev_index, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);

>  	if (rproc->index < 0) {

> @@ -2435,8 +2453,16 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc)

>  	if (!rproc)

>  		return -EINVAL;

>  

> -	/* TODO: make sure this works with rproc->power > 1 */

> -	rproc_shutdown(rproc);

> +	/*

> +	 * TODO: make sure this works with rproc->power > 1

> +	 *

> +	 * No need to check rproc->state right away, it will be done in either

> +	 * rproc_detach() or rproc_shutdown().

> +	 */

> +	if (rproc->autonomous_on_core_shutdown)

> +		rproc_detach(rproc);

> +	else

> +		rproc_shutdown(rproc);


same here

>  

>  	mutex_lock(&rproc->lock);

>  	rproc->state = RPROC_DELETED;

> diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h

> index 02312096d59f..5702f630d810 100644

> --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h

> +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h

> @@ -516,6 +516,9 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {

>   * @nb_vdev: number of vdev currently handled by rproc

>   * @char_dev: character device of the rproc

>   * @cdev_put_on_release: flag to indicate if remoteproc should be shutdown on @char_dev release

> + * @autonomous_on_core_shutdown: true if the remote processor should be detached

> + *				 from (rather than turned off) when the remoteproc

> + *				 core goes away.

>   */

>  struct rproc {

>  	struct list_head node;

> @@ -554,6 +557,7 @@ struct rproc {

>  	u16 elf_machine;

>  	struct cdev cdev;

>  	bool cdev_put_on_release;

> +	bool autonomous_on_core_shutdown;

>  };

>  

>  /**

>
Mathieu Poirier Dec. 9, 2020, 9:34 p.m. UTC | #2
On Wed, Dec 09, 2020 at 11:13:07AM +0100, Arnaud POULIQUEN wrote:
> 

> 

> On 11/26/20 10:06 PM, Mathieu Poirier wrote:

> > Refactor function rproc_del() and rproc_cdev_release() to take

> > into account the policy specified in the device tree.

> > 

> > Signed-off-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org>

> > ---

> >  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c | 13 +++++++++++-

> >  drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++--

> >  include/linux/remoteproc.h           |  4 ++++

> >  3 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

> > 

> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c

> > index f7645f289563..3dfe555dfc07 100644

> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c

> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c

> > @@ -88,7 +88,18 @@ static int rproc_cdev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)

> >  {

> >  	struct rproc *rproc = container_of(inode->i_cdev, struct rproc, cdev);

> >  

> > -	if (rproc->cdev_put_on_release && rproc->state == RPROC_RUNNING)

> > +	if (!rproc->cdev_put_on_release)

> > +		return 0;

> > +

> > +	/*

> > +	 * The application has crashed or is releasing its file handle.  Detach

> > +	 * or shutdown the remote processor based on the policy specified in the

> > +	 * DT.  No need to check rproc->state right away, it will be done

> > +	 * in either rproc_detach() or rproc_shutdown().

> > +	 */

> > +	if (rproc->autonomous_on_core_shutdown)

> > +		rproc_detach(rproc);

> > +	else

> >  		rproc_shutdown(rproc);

> 

> A reason to not propagate the return of functions?


A valid observation...  I'll fix it.

> 

> >  

> >  	return 0;

> > diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c

> > index 3d7d245edc4e..1a170103bf27 100644

> > --- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c

> > +++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c

> > @@ -2294,6 +2294,22 @@ static int rproc_alloc_ops(struct rproc *rproc, const struct rproc_ops *ops)

> >  	return 0;

> >  }

> >  

> > +static void rproc_set_automation_flags(struct rproc *rproc)

> > +{

> > +	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;

> > +	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;

> > +	bool core_shutdown;

> > +

> > +	/*

> > +	 * When function rproc_cdev_release() or rproc_del() are called and

> > +	 * the remote processor has been attached to, it will be detached from

> > +	 * (rather than turned off) if "autonomous-on-core-shutdown is specified

> > +	 * in the DT.

> > +	 */

> > +	core_shutdown = of_property_read_bool(np, "autonomous-on-core-shutdown");

> > +	rproc->autonomous_on_core_shutdown = core_shutdown;

> > +}

> > +

> >  /**

> >   * rproc_alloc() - allocate a remote processor handle

> >   * @dev: the underlying device

> > @@ -2352,6 +2368,8 @@ struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,

> >  	if (rproc_alloc_ops(rproc, ops))

> >  		goto put_device;

> >  

> > +	rproc_set_automation_flags(rproc);

> > +

> >  	/* Assign a unique device index and name */

> >  	rproc->index = ida_simple_get(&rproc_dev_index, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);

> >  	if (rproc->index < 0) {

> > @@ -2435,8 +2453,16 @@ int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc)

> >  	if (!rproc)

> >  		return -EINVAL;

> >  

> > -	/* TODO: make sure this works with rproc->power > 1 */

> > -	rproc_shutdown(rproc);

> > +	/*

> > +	 * TODO: make sure this works with rproc->power > 1

> > +	 *

> > +	 * No need to check rproc->state right away, it will be done in either

> > +	 * rproc_detach() or rproc_shutdown().

> > +	 */

> > +	if (rproc->autonomous_on_core_shutdown)

> > +		rproc_detach(rproc);

> > +	else

> > +		rproc_shutdown(rproc);

> 

> same here

> 

> >  

> >  	mutex_lock(&rproc->lock);

> >  	rproc->state = RPROC_DELETED;

> > diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h

> > index 02312096d59f..5702f630d810 100644

> > --- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h

> > +++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h

> > @@ -516,6 +516,9 @@ struct rproc_dump_segment {

> >   * @nb_vdev: number of vdev currently handled by rproc

> >   * @char_dev: character device of the rproc

> >   * @cdev_put_on_release: flag to indicate if remoteproc should be shutdown on @char_dev release

> > + * @autonomous_on_core_shutdown: true if the remote processor should be detached

> > + *				 from (rather than turned off) when the remoteproc

> > + *				 core goes away.

> >   */

> >  struct rproc {

> >  	struct list_head node;

> > @@ -554,6 +557,7 @@ struct rproc {

> >  	u16 elf_machine;

> >  	struct cdev cdev;

> >  	bool cdev_put_on_release;

> > +	bool autonomous_on_core_shutdown;

> >  };

> >  

> >  /**

> >
diff mbox series

Patch

diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
index f7645f289563..3dfe555dfc07 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_cdev.c
@@ -88,7 +88,18 @@  static int rproc_cdev_release(struct inode *inode, struct file *filp)
 {
 	struct rproc *rproc = container_of(inode->i_cdev, struct rproc, cdev);
 
-	if (rproc->cdev_put_on_release && rproc->state == RPROC_RUNNING)
+	if (!rproc->cdev_put_on_release)
+		return 0;
+
+	/*
+	 * The application has crashed or is releasing its file handle.  Detach
+	 * or shutdown the remote processor based on the policy specified in the
+	 * DT.  No need to check rproc->state right away, it will be done
+	 * in either rproc_detach() or rproc_shutdown().
+	 */
+	if (rproc->autonomous_on_core_shutdown)
+		rproc_detach(rproc);
+	else
 		rproc_shutdown(rproc);
 
 	return 0;
diff --git a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
index 3d7d245edc4e..1a170103bf27 100644
--- a/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
+++ b/drivers/remoteproc/remoteproc_core.c
@@ -2294,6 +2294,22 @@  static int rproc_alloc_ops(struct rproc *rproc, const struct rproc_ops *ops)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static void rproc_set_automation_flags(struct rproc *rproc)
+{
+	struct device *dev = rproc->dev.parent;
+	struct device_node *np = dev->of_node;
+	bool core_shutdown;
+
+	/*
+	 * When function rproc_cdev_release() or rproc_del() are called and
+	 * the remote processor has been attached to, it will be detached from
+	 * (rather than turned off) if "autonomous-on-core-shutdown is specified
+	 * in the DT.
+	 */
+	core_shutdown = of_property_read_bool(np, "autonomous-on-core-shutdown");
+	rproc->autonomous_on_core_shutdown = core_shutdown;
+}
+
 /**
  * rproc_alloc() - allocate a remote processor handle
  * @dev: the underlying device
@@ -2352,6 +2368,8 @@  struct rproc *rproc_alloc(struct device *dev, const char *name,
 	if (rproc_alloc_ops(rproc, ops))
 		goto put_device;
 
+	rproc_set_automation_flags(rproc);
+
 	/* Assign a unique device index and name */
 	rproc->index = ida_simple_get(&rproc_dev_index, 0, 0, GFP_KERNEL);
 	if (rproc->index < 0) {
@@ -2435,8 +2453,16 @@  int rproc_del(struct rproc *rproc)
 	if (!rproc)
 		return -EINVAL;
 
-	/* TODO: make sure this works with rproc->power > 1 */
-	rproc_shutdown(rproc);
+	/*
+	 * TODO: make sure this works with rproc->power > 1
+	 *
+	 * No need to check rproc->state right away, it will be done in either
+	 * rproc_detach() or rproc_shutdown().
+	 */
+	if (rproc->autonomous_on_core_shutdown)
+		rproc_detach(rproc);
+	else
+		rproc_shutdown(rproc);
 
 	mutex_lock(&rproc->lock);
 	rproc->state = RPROC_DELETED;
diff --git a/include/linux/remoteproc.h b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
index 02312096d59f..5702f630d810 100644
--- a/include/linux/remoteproc.h
+++ b/include/linux/remoteproc.h
@@ -516,6 +516,9 @@  struct rproc_dump_segment {
  * @nb_vdev: number of vdev currently handled by rproc
  * @char_dev: character device of the rproc
  * @cdev_put_on_release: flag to indicate if remoteproc should be shutdown on @char_dev release
+ * @autonomous_on_core_shutdown: true if the remote processor should be detached
+ *				 from (rather than turned off) when the remoteproc
+ *				 core goes away.
  */
 struct rproc {
 	struct list_head node;
@@ -554,6 +557,7 @@  struct rproc {
 	u16 elf_machine;
 	struct cdev cdev;
 	bool cdev_put_on_release;
+	bool autonomous_on_core_shutdown;
 };
 
 /**