mbox series

[v8,00/30] Add support for QMC HDLC, framer infrastructure and PEF2256 framer

Message ID 20231011061437.64213-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com
Headers show
Series Add support for QMC HDLC, framer infrastructure and PEF2256 framer | expand

Message

Herve Codina Oct. 11, 2023, 6:14 a.m. UTC 
Hi,

I have a system where I need to handle an HDLC interface and some audio
data.

The HDLC data are transferred using a TDM bus on which a PEF2256
(E1/T1 framer) is present. The PEF2256 transfers data from/to the TDM
bus to/from the E1 line. This PEF2256 is connected to a PowerQUICC SoC
for the control path and the TDM is connected to the SoC (QMC component)
for the data path.

Comments

Jakub Kicinski Oct. 13, 2023, 11:46 p.m. UTC | #1 
On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 08:14:04 +0200 Herve Codina wrote:
> Compare to the previous iteration
>   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20230928070652.330429-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com/
> This v8 series:
>  - Fixes a race condition
>  - Uses menuconfig instead of menu and hides CONFIG_GENERIC_FRAMER
>  - Performs minor changes

Which way will those patches go? Via some FSL SoC tree?
Herve Codina Oct. 25, 2023, 3 p.m. UTC | #2 
Hi All, Maintainers

On Fri, 13 Oct 2023 16:46:47 -0700
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 11 Oct 2023 08:14:04 +0200 Herve Codina wrote:
> > Compare to the previous iteration
> >   https://lore.kernel.org/linux-kernel/20230928070652.330429-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com/
> > This v8 series:
> >  - Fixes a race condition
> >  - Uses menuconfig instead of menu and hides CONFIG_GENERIC_FRAMER
> >  - Performs minor changes  
> 
> Which way will those patches go? Via some FSL SoC tree?

This series seems mature now.
What is the plan next in order to have it applied ?

Don't hesitate to tell me if you prefer split series.

Best regards,
Hervé
Jakub Kicinski Oct. 25, 2023, 7:32 p.m. UTC | #3 
On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 17:00:51 +0200 Herve Codina wrote:
> > Which way will those patches go? Via some FSL SoC tree?  
> 
> This series seems mature now.
> What is the plan next in order to have it applied ?
> 
> Don't hesitate to tell me if you prefer split series.

FWIW we are happy to take the drivers/net/ parts if there is no hard
dependency. But there's no point taking that unless the SoC bits
also go in for 6.7.

Li Yang, what are your expectations WRT merging this series?
Mark Brown Oct. 25, 2023, 7:47 p.m. UTC | #4 
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 12:32:15PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 17:00:51 +0200 Herve Codina wrote:
> > > Which way will those patches go? Via some FSL SoC tree?  

> > This series seems mature now.
> > What is the plan next in order to have it applied ?

> > Don't hesitate to tell me if you prefer split series.

> FWIW we are happy to take the drivers/net/ parts if there is no hard
> dependency. But there's no point taking that unless the SoC bits
> also go in for 6.7.

> Li Yang, what are your expectations WRT merging this series?

I did previously ask for the generic framer bit as a tag so I could
apply the ASoC part but nobody responded and I've been getting repeated
resends of the series :(
Rob Herring (Arm) Oct. 30, 2023, 9:31 p.m. UTC | #5 
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 12:32:15PM -0700, Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Oct 2023 17:00:51 +0200 Herve Codina wrote:
> > > Which way will those patches go? Via some FSL SoC tree?  
> > 
> > This series seems mature now.
> > What is the plan next in order to have it applied ?
> > 
> > Don't hesitate to tell me if you prefer split series.
> 
> FWIW we are happy to take the drivers/net/ parts if there is no hard
> dependency. But there's no point taking that unless the SoC bits
> also go in for 6.7.
> 
> Li Yang, what are your expectations WRT merging this series?

I think it is too late for SoC stuff for 6.7. 

I picked up binding patches 6, 7, and 8 because 6 and 7 are the same as 
an additionalProperties fix I have in my tree. As 8 depends on them, I 
just picked it up too.

Rob