Message ID | 20240703025850.2172008-1-quic_tengfan@quicinc.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | arm64: qcom: dts: add QCS9100 support | expand |
On Wed, 03 Jul 2024 04:20:29 +0000 patchwork-bot+netdevbpf@kernel.org wrote: > This series was applied to netdev/net-next.git (main) > by Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>: > Here is the summary with links: > - [01/47] dt-bindings: arm: qcom: Document QCS9100 SoC and RIDE board > (no matching commit) > - [02/47] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs9100: Introduce QCS9100 SoC dtsi > (no matching commit) > - [03/47] arm64: dts: qcom: qcs9100: Introduce QCS9100 PMIC dtsi > https://git.kernel.org/netdev/net-next/c/df18948d331e This is some bug / false positive in the bot, to be clear. Commit df18948d331e is ("Merge branch 'device-memory-tcp'"). No idea how it got from that to DTS.
On 7/4/2024 2:49 AM, Jakub Kicinski wrote: > This is some bug / false positive in the bot, to be clear. > Commit df18948d331e is ("Merge branch 'device-memory-tcp'"). > No idea how it got from that to DTS. This issue may be due to the patch series being too large. In the future, I plan to split the patch series by different subsystem, which should prevent similar issue.
On 7/3/2024 2:28 PM, Conor Dooley wrote: > On Wed, Jul 03, 2024 at 06:45:00AM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: >> On 03/07/2024 05:56, Tengfei Fan wrote: >>> Introduce support for the QCS9100 SoC device tree (DTSI) and the >>> QCS9100 RIDE board DTS. The QCS9100 is a variant of the SA8775p. >>> While the QCS9100 platform is still in the early design stage, the >>> QCS9100 RIDE board is identical to the SA8775p RIDE board, except it >>> mounts the QCS9100 SoC instead of the SA8775p SoC. >> >> The same huge patchset, to huge number of recipients was sent twice. >> First, sorry, this is way too big. Second, it has way too many >> recipients, but this is partially a result of first point. Only >> partially because you put here dozen of totally unrelated emails. Sorry, >> that does not make even sense. See form letter at the end how this >> works. Third, sending it to everyone twice is a way to annoy them off >> twice... Fourth, >> >> Please split your work and do not cc dozen of unrelated folks. > > One of the extra recipients is cos that of that patch I sent adding the > cache bindings to the cache entry, forgetting that that would CC the > riscv list on all cache bindings. I modified that patch to drop the riscv > list from the entry. > > Cheers, > Conor. Thank you, Conor!