Message ID | 20250417120118.17610-3-ziyao@disroot.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Support I2C controllers in RK3528 | expand |
Hi Krzysztof, Am Donnerstag, 17. April 2025, 16:46:35 Mitteleuropäische Sommerzeit schrieb Yao Zi: > On Thu, Apr 17, 2025 at 04:36:57PM +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > On 17/04/2025 16:36, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > On 17/04/2025 14:01, Yao Zi wrote: > > >> Describe I2C controllers shipped by RK3528 in devicetree. For I2C-2, > > >> I2C-4 and I2C-7 which come with only a set of possible pins, a default > > >> pin configuration is included. > > >> > > >> Signed-off-by: Yao Zi <ziyao@disroot.org> > > >> --- > > >> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi | 110 +++++++++++++++++++++++ > > >> 1 file changed, 110 insertions(+) > > >> > > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi > > >> index 826f9be0be19..2c9780069af9 100644 > > >> --- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi > > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3528.dtsi > > >> @@ -24,6 +24,14 @@ aliases { > > >> gpio2 = &gpio2; > > >> gpio3 = &gpio3; > > >> gpio4 = &gpio4; > > >> + i2c0 = &i2c0; > > >> + i2c1 = &i2c1; > > >> + i2c2 = &i2c2; > > >> + i2c3 = &i2c3; > > >> + i2c4 = &i2c4; > > >> + i2c5 = &i2c5; > > >> + i2c6 = &i2c6; > > >> + i2c7 = &i2c7; > > > Aliases are not properties of the SoC but boards. > > > > Of course this should be: Bus/interface aliases are not... > > Thanks for the explanation. Will move them to the board DT. I think we're having that discussion for every soc :-) . Uarts. gpios, i2c and spi are always labeled foo[0-...] in all pieces of Rockchip documentation. The i2c0 controller has pins i2c0-scl, i2c0_sda; i2c0-labeled iomem; i2c0-labeled irq, clk_i2c0, resetn_i2c0. I completely _agree_ that {sdhci, sdmmc, emmc, sdio} -> mmcX is fully board specific, but i2c0 should always get the i2c0 label and no other controller should occupy that soc-specific i2c0-space, because that would cause confusion without end. And with the above it makes no real sense repeating the same list for every individual board. If you _insist_ on this, then fine, but I really don't see the point. Heiko