Message ID | 20230519011915.846407-1-jeffxu@chromium.org |
---|---|
Headers | show
Return-Path: <linux-kselftest-owner@vger.kernel.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0172FC7EE2C for <linux-kselftest@archiver.kernel.org>; Fri, 19 May 2023 01:19:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S229973AbjESBTa (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kselftest@archiver.kernel.org>); Thu, 18 May 2023 21:19:30 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:53530 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229812AbjESBT3 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 18 May 2023 21:19:29 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-x62f.google.com (mail-pl1-x62f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::62f]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 25E4AE4C for <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 18 May 2023 18:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-pl1-x62f.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1ae3ed1b08eso27516275ad.0 for <linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org>; Thu, 18 May 2023 18:19:27 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; t=1684459166; x=1687051166; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GjQ7lK8x1oL2I5FLMeKnNLIrlKblkTMw13nT3cZTNwk=; b=ZMW1ujm0IGNY4HJVwAoezA3+fLyirNIeI5kZF43KvmeV0tNoxyX+O2S2JdzkpN852K qwo/z8/aQZ78rKRpB4A25ywXP0hUVPkkkPIL/MA9enCQ/vdpwKmPx0Am8kl+ts9BBL/F kWJ5nb+orKVuCwDB7UZg+kL2eN4Sx2jtWLjyc= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1684459166; x=1687051166; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:message-id:date:subject:cc :to:from:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=GjQ7lK8x1oL2I5FLMeKnNLIrlKblkTMw13nT3cZTNwk=; b=CppNx/A0g2YrNRmogSUQkE2ApzlMyxxfnzXyYIGN/BM+zvy663bOagXa+7WGkPOLaC 59y9scRDhmy7rxsKUpFrxDRu0WDf9qmXVwjLkcjKzJEQoce4FHOwneA+mrYZpjOjWPUG suQHZic20KE4GiCm1lb+84QUG4TgaI//C4a7j+UV8yYpjdlGmimRHoW3c5fTkVtBCFar StsqH+I+b1MVNX0ewwafQzwpdlSOUT6w0IrkUL+fdIHL2lCcSsjCW2Q/2oQUgzWPwt04 OjbOcoXMDHJKxGf0JtQttYACJ4OpDgEzTUUr74kj6PcEmdJemo8bGQbhWoV8+TcMaL1Y 0rmw== X-Gm-Message-State: AC+VfDyioF0BDpvD+7J3P16e4iWxUYYOySDF8umCjM0C/Uj1relG9lLc uVc2LlaOwUm3JvgY1c/Bq5RBvQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACHHUZ52jvk/GEcjXoEOI/KyFOvc57rvcKEvB+GgBuys5A2AaRwCx5rVtsr4rXoWnPmxj1vyw0YjsQ== X-Received: by 2002:a17:903:32c7:b0:1ac:43ea:7882 with SMTP id i7-20020a17090332c700b001ac43ea7882mr1271097plr.29.1684459166520; Thu, 18 May 2023 18:19:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (183.43.230.35.bc.googleusercontent.com. [35.230.43.183]) by smtp.gmail.com with UTF8SMTPSA id j6-20020a170902c08600b001ac2be26340sm2075201pld.222.2023.05.18.18.19.25 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 18 May 2023 18:19:26 -0700 (PDT) From: jeffxu@chromium.org To: dave.hansen@intel.com, luto@kernel.org, jorgelo@chromium.org, keescook@chromium.org, groeck@chromium.org, jannh@google.com, sroettger@google.com Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, jeffxu@google.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org Subject: [PATCH v1 0/6] Memory Mapping (VMA) protection using PKU - set 1 Date: Fri, 19 May 2023 01:19:08 +0000 Message-ID: <20230519011915.846407-1-jeffxu@chromium.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.40.1.698.g37aff9b760-goog MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Precedence: bulk List-ID: <linux-kselftest.vger.kernel.org> X-Mailing-List: linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org |
Series |
Memory Mapping (VMA) protection using PKU - set 1
|
expand
|
From: Jeff Xu <jeffxu@google.com> This is the first set of Memory mapping (VMA) protection patches using PKU. * * * Background: As discussed previously in the kernel mailing list [1], V8 CFI [2] uses PKU to protect memory, and Stephen Röttger proposes to extend the PKU to memory mapping [3]. We're using PKU for in-process isolation to enforce control-flow integrity for a JIT compiler. In our threat model, an attacker exploits a vulnerability and has arbitrary read/write access to the whole process space concurrently to other threads being executed. This attacker can manipulate some arguments to syscalls from some threads. Under such a powerful attack, we want to create a “safe/isolated” thread environment. We assign dedicated PKUs to this thread, and use those PKUs to protect the threads’ runtime environment. The thread has exclusive access to its run-time memory. This includes modifying the protection of the memory mapping, or munmap the memory mapping after use. And the other threads won’t be able to access the memory or modify the memory mapping (VMA) belonging to the thread. * * * Proposed changes: This patch introduces a new flag, PKEY_ENFORCE_API, to the pkey_alloc() function. When a PKEY is created with this flag, it is enforced that any thread that wants to make changes to the memory mapping (such as mprotect) of the memory must have write access to the PKEY. PKEYs created without this flag will continue to work as they do now, for backwards compatibility. Only PKEY created from user space can have the new flag set, the PKEY allocated by the kernel internally will not have it. In other words, ARCH_DEFAULT_PKEY(0) and execute_only_pkey won’t have this flag set, and continue work as today. This flag is checked only at syscall entry, such as mprotect/munmap in this set of patches. It will not apply to other call paths. In other words, if the kernel want to change attributes of VMA for some reasons, the kernel is free to do that and not affected by this new flag. This set of patch covers mprotect/munmap, I plan to work on other syscalls after this. * * * Testing: I have tested this patch on a Linux kernel 5.15, 6,1, and 6.4-rc1, new selftest is added in: pkey_enforce_api.c * * * Discussion: We believe that this patch provides a valuable security feature. It allows us to create “safe/isolated” thread environments that are protected from attackers with arbitrary read/write access to the process space. We believe that the interface change and the patch don't introduce backwards compatibility risk. We would like to disucss this patch in Linux kernel community for feedback and support. * * * Reference: [1]https://lore.kernel.org/all/202208221331.71C50A6F@keescook/ [2]https://docs.google.com/document/d/1O2jwK4dxI3nRcOJuPYkonhTkNQfbmwdvxQMyXgeaRHo/edit?usp=sharing [3]https://docs.google.com/document/d/1qqVoVfRiF2nRylL3yjZyCQvzQaej1HRPh3f5wj1AS9I/edit * * * Current status: There are on-going discussion related to threat model, io_uring, we will continue discuss using v0 thread. * * * PATCH history: v1: update code related review comments: mprotect.c: remove syscall from do_mprotect_pkey() remove pr_warn_ratelimited munmap.c: change syscall to enum caller_origin remove pr_warn_ratelimited v0: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20230515130553.2311248-1-jeffxu@chromium.org/ Best Regards, -Jeff Xu Jeff Xu (6): PKEY: Introduce PKEY_ENFORCE_API flag PKEY: Add arch_check_pkey_enforce_api() PKEY: Apply PKEY_ENFORCE_API to mprotect PKEY:selftest pkey_enforce_api for mprotect PKEY: Apply PKEY_ENFORCE_API to munmap PKEY:selftest pkey_enforce_api for munmap arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h | 19 +- arch/x86/include/asm/mmu.h | 7 + arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h | 92 +- arch/x86/mm/pkeys.c | 2 +- include/linux/mm.h | 8 +- include/linux/pkeys.h | 18 +- include/uapi/linux/mman.h | 5 + mm/mmap.c | 31 +- mm/mprotect.c | 17 +- mm/mremap.c | 6 +- tools/testing/selftests/mm/Makefile | 1 + tools/testing/selftests/mm/pkey_enforce_api.c | 1312 +++++++++++++++++ 12 files changed, 1499 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/mm/pkey_enforce_api.c base-commit: ba0ad6ed89fd5dada3b7b65ef2b08e95d449d4ab