Message ID | tencent_B2D0435BC011135736262764B511994F4805@qq.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | RISC-V: mm: do not treat hint addr on mmap as the upper bound to search | expand |
This patch has not been reviewed for more than a month. There is another patch that did the same fix but in another way and still has not been reviewed like this. I'm here to do a comparison of some choices briefly to let the maintainer understand the issues and the solutions. I think it's time to make a decision before the next Linux LTS v6.9. As a number of sv48 chips will be released this year. Issues: Since commit add2cc6b6515 ("RISC-V: mm: Restrict address space for sv39,sv48,sv57") from patch [1], userspace software cannot create virtual address memory mapping on the hint address if the address larger than (1<<38) on sv48, sv57 capable CPU using mmap without MAP_FIXED set. This is because since that commit, the hint address is treated as the upper bound to create the mapping when the hint address is larger than (1<<38). Existing regression for userspace software since that commit: - box64 [2] Some choices are: 1. Do not change it Con: This behavior is not the same as x86, arm64, and powerpc when treating memory address space larger than 48-bit. On x86, arm64, and powerpc, if the hint address is larger than 48-bit, mmap will not limit the upper bound to use. Also, these ISAs limit the mmap to 48-bit by default. However, RISC-V currently uses sv39 by default, which is not the same as the document and commit message. 2. Use my patch which limits the upper bound of mmap to 47-bit by default, if the hint address is larger than (1<<47), then no limit. Pros: Let the behavior of mmap align with x86, arm64, powerpc Cons: A new regression for software that assumes mmap will not return an address larger than the hint address if the hint address is larger than (1<<38) as it has been documented on RISC-V since v6.6. However, there is no change in the widespread sv39 systems we use now. 3. Use Charlie's patch [3] which adjusts the upper bound to hint address + size. Pros: Still has upper-bound limit using hint address but allows userspace to create mapping on the hint address without MAP_FIXED set. Cons: That patch will introduce a new regression even for the sv39 system when creating mmap with the same hint address more than one time if the hint address is less than round-gap. 4. Some new ideas currently are not on the mailing list Hope this issue can be fixed before the Linux v6.9 release. Thanks, Yangyu Chen [1] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20230809232218.849726-2-charlie@rivosinc.com/ [2] https://github.com/ptitSeb/box64/commit/5b700cb6e6f397d2074c49659f7f9915f4a33c5f [3] https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20240130-use_mmap_hint_address-v3-0-8a655cfa8bcb@rivosinc.com/