@@ -51,16 +51,19 @@ def main():
nr_quota_exceeds = scheme.stats.qt_exceeds
wss_collected.sort()
+ nr_expected_quota_exceeds = 0
for wss in wss_collected:
if wss > sz_quota:
print('quota is not kept: %s > %s' % (wss, sz_quota))
print('collected samples are as below')
print('\n'.join(['%d' % wss for wss in wss_collected]))
exit(1)
+ if wss == sz_quota:
+ nr_expected_quota_exceeds += 1
- if nr_quota_exceeds < len(wss_collected):
- print('quota is not always exceeded: %d > %d' %
- (len(wss_collected), nr_quota_exceeds))
+ if nr_quota_exceeds < nr_expected_quota_exceeds:
+ print('quota is exceeded less than expected: %d < %d' %
+ (nr_quota_exceeds, nr_expected_quota_exceeds))
exit(1)
if __name__ == '__main__':
damos_quota.py assumes the quota will always exceeded. But whether quota will be exceeded or not depend on the monitoring results. Actually the monitored workload has chaning access pattern and hence sometimes the quota may not really be exceeded. As a result, false positive test failures happen. Expect how much time the quota will be exceeded by checking the monitoring results, and use it instead of the naive assumption. Fixes: 51f58c9da14b ("selftests/damon: add a test for DAMOS quota") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/damon/damos_quota.py | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)