| Message ID | 2438cf7e4ecb2444a79f838437c149dd7d5bdde6.1688078605.git.falcon@tinylab.org |
|---|---|
| State | Superseded |
| Headers | show |
| Series | allow run with minimal kernel config | expand |
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c index 0ca7d011765a..0847813d756c 100644 --- a/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c @@ -888,10 +888,10 @@ static int expect_vfprintf(int llen, size_t c, const char *expected, const char FILE *memfile; va_list args; - fd = memfd_create("vfprintf", 0); + fd = open("/tmp", O_TMPFILE | O_EXCL | O_RDWR, 0600); if (fd == -1) { - pad_spc(llen, 64, "[FAIL]\n"); - return 1; + pad_spc(llen, 64, "[SKIPPED]\n"); + return 0; } memfile = fdopen(fd, "w+");
The vfprintf test case require to open a temporary file to write, the old memfd_create() method is perfect but has strong dependency on MEMFD_CREATE and also TMPFS or HUGETLBFS (see fs/Kconfig): config MEMFD_CREATE def_bool TMPFS || HUGETLBFS And from v6.2, MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL must be passed for the non-executable memfd, otherwise, The kernel warning will be output to the test result like this: Running test 'vfprintf' 0 emptymemfd_create() without MFD_EXEC nor MFD_NOEXEC_SEAL, pid=1 'init' "" = "" [OK] To avoid such warning and also to remove the MEMFD_CREATE dependency, let's open a file from tmpfs directly. The /tmp directory is used to detect the existing of tmpfs, if not there, skip instead of fail. And further, for pid == 1, the initramfs is loaded as ramfs, which can be used as tmpfs, so, it is able to further remove TMPFS dependency too. Suggested-by: Thomas Weißschuh <linux@weissschuh.net> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/9ad51430-b7c0-47dc-80af-20c86539498d@t-8ch.de Signed-off-by: Zhangjin Wu <falcon@tinylab.org> --- tools/testing/selftests/nolibc/nolibc-test.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)