Message ID | 20230824073710.2677348-1-lee@kernel.org |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | Rid W=1 warnings from GPU | expand |
Hi, On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 10:59:54AM +0200, Maxime Ripard wrote: > On Thu, 24 Aug 2023 08:36:45 +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > > niggly little warnings. > > > > Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> > > Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > > Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com> > > Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com> > > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> > > Cc: Danilo Krummrich <dakr@redhat.com> > > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> > > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > > Cc: Fabio Estevam <festevam@gmail.com> > > Cc: Gourav Samaiya <gsamaiya@nvidia.com> > > Cc: Hawking Zhang <Hawking.Zhang@amd.com> > > Cc: Hyun Kwon <hyun.kwon@xilinx.com> > > Cc: Jerome Glisse <glisse@freedesktop.org> > > Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> > > Cc: Karol Herbst <kherbst@redhat.com> > > Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@ideasonboard.com> > > Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org > > Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org > > Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: linux-tegra@vger.kernel.org > > Cc: Luben Tuikov <luben.tuikov@amd.com> > > Cc: Lyude Paul <lyude@redhat.com> > > Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> > > Cc: "Maíra Canal" <mairacanal@riseup.net> > > Cc: Mario Limonciello <mario.limonciello@amd.com> > > Cc: Maxime Ripard <mripard@kernel.org> > > Cc: Michal Simek <michal.simek@xilinx.com> > > Cc: Mikko Perttunen <mperttunen@nvidia.com> > > Cc: nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org > > Cc: NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@nxp.com> > > Cc: "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com> > > Cc: Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@pengutronix.de> > > Cc: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@pengutronix.de> > > Cc: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de> > > Cc: Shashank Sharma <shashank.sharma@amd.com> > > Cc: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@kernel.org> > > Cc: Stanley Yang <Stanley.Yang@amd.com> > > Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> > > Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@gmail.com> > > Cc: Thomas Zimmermann <tzimmermann@suse.de> > > > > [...] > > Applied to drm/drm-misc (drm-misc-fixes). I got confused with b4 usage, but that wasn't actually applied. Only the three patches I explicitly mentioned were, sorry for the confusion. Maxime
On Thu, 24 Aug 2023, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 24 Aug 2023, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2023, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> wrote: > > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > > > niggly little warnings. > > > > The next question is, how do we keep it W=1 clean going forward? > > My plan was to fix them all, then move each warning to W=0. Some history: - Starting with v5.8-rc1: 18867 - 2020-07-01: 18089 - 2020-07-07: 17288 - 2020-07-17: 15762 - 2020-07-20: 15724 - 2020-07-23: 15116 - 2020-08-12: 15184 - 2020-10-19: 10909 - 2020-11-04: 9385 - 2021-01-04: 5478 - 2021-01-12 4749 - 2021-01-29 4911 - 2021-04-07 3594 - 2021-05-20 2938 - 2021-07-01 2587 - 2023-02-10 2587 - 2023-08-22 1650 > Arnd recently submitted a set doing just that for a bunch of them. > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230811140327.3754597-1-arnd@kernel.org/ > > I like to think a bunch of this is built on top of my previous efforts. > > GPU is a particularly tricky though - the warnings seem to come in faster > than I can squash them. Maybe the maintainers can find a way to test > new patches on merge? > > > Most people don't use W=1 because it's too noisy, so it's a bit of a > > catch-22. > > > > In i915, we enable a lot of W=1 warnings using subdir-ccflags-y in our > > Makefile. For CI/developer use we also enable kernel-doc warnings by > > default. > > > > Should we start enabling some of those warning flags in drm/Makefile to > > to keep the entire subsystem warning free? > > That would we awesome! We'd just need buy-in.
On 8/24/23 08:07, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 24 Aug 2023, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> On Thu, 24 Aug 2023, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> wrote: >>> This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 >>> kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with >>> niggly little warnings. >> >> The next question is, how do we keep it W=1 clean going forward? > > My plan was to fix them all, then move each warning to W=0. > > Arnd recently submitted a set doing just that for a bunch of them. > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230811140327.3754597-1-arnd@kernel.org/ > > I like to think a bunch of this is built on top of my previous efforts. > > GPU is a particularly tricky though - the warnings seem to come in faster > than I can squash them. Maybe the maintainers can find a way to test > new patches on merge? I guess on that note, do you know if there is a way to run `scripts/kernel-doc` on patches instead of whole files? That would make much easier to block new kernel-doc issues from appearing. > >> Most people don't use W=1 because it's too noisy, so it's a bit of a >> catch-22. >> >> In i915, we enable a lot of W=1 warnings using subdir-ccflags-y in our >> Makefile. For CI/developer use we also enable kernel-doc warnings by >> default. >> >> Should we start enabling some of those warning flags in drm/Makefile to >> to keep the entire subsystem warning free? > > That would we awesome! We'd just need buy-in. >
On Thu, 24 Aug 2023, Hamza Mahfooz wrote: > > On 8/24/23 08:07, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2023, Jani Nikula wrote: > > > > > On Thu, 24 Aug 2023, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 > > > > kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with > > > > niggly little warnings. > > > > > > The next question is, how do we keep it W=1 clean going forward? > > > > My plan was to fix them all, then move each warning to W=0. > > > > Arnd recently submitted a set doing just that for a bunch of them. > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230811140327.3754597-1-arnd@kernel.org/ > > > > I like to think a bunch of this is built on top of my previous efforts. > > > > GPU is a particularly tricky though - the warnings seem to come in faster > > than I can squash them. Maybe the maintainers can find a way to test > > new patches on merge? > > I guess on that note, do you know if there is a way to run > `scripts/kernel-doc` on patches instead of whole files? That would make > much easier to block new kernel-doc issues from appearing. Not off hand. When I run builds on patches I author, I run them twice concurrently. Once on the commit I'm basing on and once on the HEAD of my patchset. I then diff the two. So as long as the number of errors and warnings stay the same or reduce, we're golden. Perhaps the same method could be used with `kernel-doc`?
Applied. Thanks! On Thu, Aug 24, 2023 at 3:38 AM Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> wrote: > > Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s): > > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c:516: warning: Function parameter or member 'xcc_id' not described in 'amdgpu_mm_wreg_mmio_rlc' > > Signed-off-by: Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> > --- > Cc: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com> > Cc: "Christian König" <christian.koenig@amd.com> > Cc: "Pan, Xinhui" <Xinhui.Pan@amd.com> > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@gmail.com> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch> > Cc: Sumit Semwal <sumit.semwal@linaro.org> > Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org > --- > drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c | 1 + > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c > index e77f048c99d85..d4f0e4327dd3f 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_device.c > @@ -507,6 +507,7 @@ void amdgpu_device_wreg(struct amdgpu_device *adev, > * @adev: amdgpu_device pointer > * @reg: mmio/rlc register > * @v: value to write > + * @xcc_id: xcc accelerated compute core id > * > * this function is invoked only for the debugfs register access > */ > -- > 2.42.0.rc1.204.g551eb34607-goog >
On 8/24/23 14:07, Lee Jones wrote: > On Thu, 24 Aug 2023, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Thu, 24 Aug 2023, Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org> wrote: >>> This set is part of a larger effort attempting to clean-up W=1 >>> kernel builds, which are currently overwhelmingly riddled with >>> niggly little warnings. >> >> The next question is, how do we keep it W=1 clean going forward? > > My plan was to fix them all, then move each warning to W=0. > > Arnd recently submitted a set doing just that for a bunch of them. > > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20230811140327.3754597-1-arnd@kernel.org/ > > I like to think a bunch of this is built on top of my previous efforts. > > GPU is a particularly tricky though - the warnings seem to come in faster > than I can squash them. Maybe the maintainers can find a way to test > new patches on merge? One approach for this which has proved effective in Mesa and other projects is to make warnings fatal in CI which must pass for any changes to be merged. There is ongoing work toward introducing this for the DRM subsystem, using gitlab.freedesktop.org CI.