Message ID | 20240618194647.742037-1-jonas@kwiboo.se |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | media: rkvdec: Add H.264 High 10 and 4:2:2 profile support | expand |
On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 07:46:32PM +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote: > +static u32 rkvdec_enum_decoded_fmt(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx, int index, > + enum rkvdec_image_fmt image_fmt) > { > const struct rkvdec_coded_fmt_desc *desc = ctx->coded_fmt_desc; > + unsigned int i, j; > > if (WARN_ON(!desc)) > return 0; > > - if (index >= desc->num_decoded_fmts) > - return 0; > + for (i = 0, j = 0; i < desc->num_decoded_fmts; i++) { > + if (rkvdec_image_fmt_match(desc->decoded_fmts[i].image_fmt, > + image_fmt) && > + index == j++) I really don't care for this j++ which is tucked inside a condition. > + return desc->decoded_fmts[i].fourcc; > + } int fmt_idx = -1; unsigned int i; for (i = 0, i < desc->num_decoded_fmts; i++) { if (!rkvdec_image_fmt_match(desc->decoded_fmts[i].image_fmt, image_fmt)) continue; fmt_idx++; if (index == fmt_idx) return desc->decoded_fmts[i].fourcc; } return 0; > > - return desc->decoded_fmts[index]; > + return 0; > } Don't resend if this is the only issue, but if you do resend could you get rid of the j++? regards, dan carpenter
Hi Dan, On 2024-06-19 09:21, Dan Carpenter wrote: > On Tue, Jun 18, 2024 at 07:46:32PM +0000, Jonas Karlman wrote: >> +static u32 rkvdec_enum_decoded_fmt(struct rkvdec_ctx *ctx, int index, >> + enum rkvdec_image_fmt image_fmt) >> { >> const struct rkvdec_coded_fmt_desc *desc = ctx->coded_fmt_desc; >> + unsigned int i, j; >> >> if (WARN_ON(!desc)) >> return 0; >> >> - if (index >= desc->num_decoded_fmts) >> - return 0; >> + for (i = 0, j = 0; i < desc->num_decoded_fmts; i++) { >> + if (rkvdec_image_fmt_match(desc->decoded_fmts[i].image_fmt, >> + image_fmt) && >> + index == j++) > > I really don't care for this j++ which is tucked inside a condition. > >> + return desc->decoded_fmts[i].fourcc; >> + } > > int fmt_idx = -1; > unsigned int i; > > for (i = 0, i < desc->num_decoded_fmts; i++) { > if (!rkvdec_image_fmt_match(desc->decoded_fmts[i].image_fmt, > image_fmt)) > continue; > fmt_idx++; > if (index == fmt_idx) > return desc->decoded_fmts[i].fourcc; > } > > return 0; > >> >> - return desc->decoded_fmts[index]; >> + return 0; >> } > > Don't resend if this is the only issue, but if you do resend could you > get rid of the j++? Thanks, I will send a v6 later today/tomorrow and will include your proposed change. Regards, Jonas > > regards, > dan carpenter