@@ -1212,6 +1212,7 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_submit(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
struct amdgpu_job *job;
uint64_t seq;
int r;
+ bool fence_cookie;
job = p->job;
p->job = NULL;
@@ -1226,6 +1227,8 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_submit(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
*/
mutex_lock(&p->adev->notifier_lock);
+ fence_cookie = dma_fence_begin_signalling();
+
/* If userptr are invalidated after amdgpu_cs_parser_bos(), return
* -EAGAIN, drmIoctl in libdrm will restart the amdgpu_cs_ioctl.
*/
@@ -1262,12 +1265,14 @@ static int amdgpu_cs_submit(struct amdgpu_cs_parser *p,
amdgpu_vm_move_to_lru_tail(p->adev, &fpriv->vm);
ttm_eu_fence_buffer_objects(&p->ticket, &p->validated, p->fence);
+ dma_fence_end_signalling(fence_cookie);
mutex_unlock(&p->adev->notifier_lock);
return 0;
error_abort:
drm_sched_job_cleanup(&job->base);
+ dma_fence_end_signalling(fence_cookie);
mutex_unlock(&p->adev->notifier_lock);
error_unlock:
This is a bit tricky, since ->notifier_lock is held while calling dma_fence_wait we must ensure that also the read side (i.e. dma_fence_begin_signalling) is on the same side. If we mix this up lockdep complaints, and that's again why we want to have these annotations. A nice side effect of this is that because of the fs_reclaim priming for dma_fence_enable lockdep now automatically checks for us that nothing in here allocates memory, without even running any userptr workloads. Cc: linux-media@vger.kernel.org Cc: linaro-mm-sig@lists.linaro.org Cc: linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@linux.intel.com> Cc: Christian König <christian.koenig@amd.com> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@intel.com> --- drivers/gpu/drm/amd/amdgpu/amdgpu_cs.c | 5 +++++ 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)