Message ID | 20241203164143.29852-1-brgl@bgdev.pl |
---|---|
State | New |
Headers | show |
Series | [1/2] gpio: omap: allow building the module with COMPILE_TEST=y | expand |
On Tue, 2024-12-03 at 17:41 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > For better build coverage, allow building the gpio-omap driver with > COMPILE_TEST Kconfig option enabled. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > index 56fee58e281e7..fb923ccd79028 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ config GPIO_OCTEON > config GPIO_OMAP > tristate "TI OMAP GPIO support" if ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || COMPILE_TEST > default y if ARCH_OMAP > - depends on ARM > + depends on ARM || COMPILE_TEST > select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP > select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP > help
On Tue, 2024-12-03 at 17:41 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > We can drop the else branch if we get the clock already prepared using > the relevant helper. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com> > --- > drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c | 4 +--- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c > index 54c4bfdccf568..57d299d5d0b16 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c > +++ b/drivers/gpio/gpio-omap.c > @@ -1449,13 +1449,11 @@ static int omap_gpio_probe(struct platform_device *pdev) > } > > if (bank->dbck_flag) { > - bank->dbck = devm_clk_get(dev, "dbclk"); > + bank->dbck = devm_clk_get_prepared(dev, "dbclk"); > if (IS_ERR(bank->dbck)) { > dev_err(dev, > "Could not get gpio dbck. Disable debounce\n"); > bank->dbck_flag = false; > - } else { > - clk_prepare(bank->dbck); > } > }
On 12/3/24 10:41 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > For better build coverage, allow building the gpio-omap driver with > COMPILE_TEST Kconfig option enabled. > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > --- > drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > index 56fee58e281e7..fb923ccd79028 100644 > --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ config GPIO_OCTEON > config GPIO_OMAP > tristate "TI OMAP GPIO support" if ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || COMPILE_TEST > default y if ARCH_OMAP > - depends on ARM > + depends on ARM || COMPILE_TEST Why do we have this depends on ARM at all? It already has that condition above on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS which limits to ARM outside of compile testing. And anything that selects ARCH_OMAP2PLUS also selects ARCH_OMAP, so we could just do this: --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig @@ -528,9 +528,9 @@ config GPIO_OCTEON family of SOCs. config GPIO_OMAP - tristate "TI OMAP GPIO support" if ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || COMPILE_TEST - default y if ARCH_OMAP - depends on ARM + tristate "TI OMAP GPIO support" + default y + depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || COMPILE_TEST select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP help Andrew > select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP > select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP > help
On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 7:41 PM Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> wrote: > > On 12/3/24 10:41 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > > > For better build coverage, allow building the gpio-omap driver with > > COMPILE_TEST Kconfig option enabled. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > > --- > > drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > > index 56fee58e281e7..fb923ccd79028 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > > +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > > @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ config GPIO_OCTEON > > config GPIO_OMAP > > tristate "TI OMAP GPIO support" if ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || COMPILE_TEST > > default y if ARCH_OMAP > > - depends on ARM > > + depends on ARM || COMPILE_TEST > > Why do we have this depends on ARM at all? It already has that condition > above on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS which limits to ARM outside of compile testing. > > And anything that selects ARCH_OMAP2PLUS also selects ARCH_OMAP, so we > could just do this: > I agree we can drop that bit. > --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > @@ -528,9 +528,9 @@ config GPIO_OCTEON > family of SOCs. > > config GPIO_OMAP > - tristate "TI OMAP GPIO support" if ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || COMPILE_TEST > - default y if ARCH_OMAP > - depends on ARM > + tristate "TI OMAP GPIO support" > + default y > + depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || COMPILE_TEST This would default to y with COMPILE_TEST. We definitely don't want that. IMO it should be: tristate "TI OMAP GPIO support" depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || COMPILE_TEST default y if ARCH_OMAP2PLUS Bartosz
On 12/3/24 2:36 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 7:41 PM Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> wrote: >> >> On 12/3/24 10:41 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: >>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> >>> >>> For better build coverage, allow building the gpio-omap driver with >>> COMPILE_TEST Kconfig option enabled. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> >>> --- >>> drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 2 +- >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) >>> >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig >>> index 56fee58e281e7..fb923ccd79028 100644 >>> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig >>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig >>> @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ config GPIO_OCTEON >>> config GPIO_OMAP >>> tristate "TI OMAP GPIO support" if ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || COMPILE_TEST >>> default y if ARCH_OMAP >>> - depends on ARM >>> + depends on ARM || COMPILE_TEST >> >> Why do we have this depends on ARM at all? It already has that condition >> above on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS which limits to ARM outside of compile testing. >> >> And anything that selects ARCH_OMAP2PLUS also selects ARCH_OMAP, so we >> could just do this: >> > > I agree we can drop that bit. > >> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig >> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig >> @@ -528,9 +528,9 @@ config GPIO_OCTEON >> family of SOCs. >> >> config GPIO_OMAP >> - tristate "TI OMAP GPIO support" if ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || COMPILE_TEST >> - default y if ARCH_OMAP >> - depends on ARM >> + tristate "TI OMAP GPIO support" >> + default y >> + depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || COMPILE_TEST > > This would default to y with COMPILE_TEST. We definitely don't want > that. IMO it should be: > > tristate "TI OMAP GPIO support" > depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || COMPILE_TEST > default y if ARCH_OMAP2PLUS > Looks good to me Andrew
On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 10:54 PM Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> wrote: > > On 12/3/24 2:36 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2024 at 7:41 PM Andrew Davis <afd@ti.com> wrote: > >> > >> On 12/3/24 10:41 AM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > >>> From: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > >>> > >>> For better build coverage, allow building the gpio-omap driver with > >>> COMPILE_TEST Kconfig option enabled. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Bartosz Golaszewski <bartosz.golaszewski@linaro.org> > >>> --- > >>> drivers/gpio/Kconfig | 2 +- > >>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > >>> > >>> diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > >>> index 56fee58e281e7..fb923ccd79028 100644 > >>> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > >>> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > >>> @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ config GPIO_OCTEON > >>> config GPIO_OMAP > >>> tristate "TI OMAP GPIO support" if ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || COMPILE_TEST > >>> default y if ARCH_OMAP > >>> - depends on ARM > >>> + depends on ARM || COMPILE_TEST > >> > >> Why do we have this depends on ARM at all? It already has that condition > >> above on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS which limits to ARM outside of compile testing. > >> > >> And anything that selects ARCH_OMAP2PLUS also selects ARCH_OMAP, so we > >> could just do this: > >> > > > > I agree we can drop that bit. > > > >> --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > >> +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig > >> @@ -528,9 +528,9 @@ config GPIO_OCTEON > >> family of SOCs. > >> > >> config GPIO_OMAP > >> - tristate "TI OMAP GPIO support" if ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || COMPILE_TEST > >> - default y if ARCH_OMAP > >> - depends on ARM > >> + tristate "TI OMAP GPIO support" > >> + default y > >> + depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || COMPILE_TEST > > > > This would default to y with COMPILE_TEST. We definitely don't want > > that. IMO it should be: > > > > tristate "TI OMAP GPIO support" > > depends on ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || COMPILE_TEST > > default y if ARCH_OMAP2PLUS > > > > Looks good to me > > Andrew Nah, this is incorrect, it doesn't build gpio-omap for omap1_defconfig. I has to depend on ARCH_OMAP under which all omap platforms fall and they all use this driver. Bart
diff --git a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig index 56fee58e281e7..fb923ccd79028 100644 --- a/drivers/gpio/Kconfig +++ b/drivers/gpio/Kconfig @@ -530,7 +530,7 @@ config GPIO_OCTEON config GPIO_OMAP tristate "TI OMAP GPIO support" if ARCH_OMAP2PLUS || COMPILE_TEST default y if ARCH_OMAP - depends on ARM + depends on ARM || COMPILE_TEST select GENERIC_IRQ_CHIP select GPIOLIB_IRQCHIP help