From patchwork Sat Mar 21 11:25:58 2020 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Thomas Gleixner X-Patchwork-Id: 212519 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D508BC4332D for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 11:36:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC43220722 for ; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 11:36:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728584AbgCULgx (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Mar 2020 07:36:53 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:38478 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727212AbgCULe4 (ORCPT ); Sat, 21 Mar 2020 07:34:56 -0400 Received: from p5de0bf0b.dip0.t-ipconnect.de ([93.224.191.11] helo=nanos.tec.linutronix.de) by Galois.linutronix.de with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1jFcOW-0002Cb-2m; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:34:24 +0100 Received: from nanos.tec.linutronix.de (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by nanos.tec.linutronix.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1AE31040C5; Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:34:20 +0100 (CET) Message-Id: <20200321113242.120587764@linutronix.de> User-Agent: quilt/0.65 Date: Sat, 21 Mar 2020 12:25:58 +0100 From: Thomas Gleixner To: LKML Cc: Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , Sebastian Siewior , Linus Torvalds , Joel Fernandes , Oleg Nesterov , Davidlohr Bueso , Logan Gunthorpe , Bjorn Helgaas , Kurt Schwemmer , linux-pci@vger.kernel.org, Greg Kroah-Hartman , Felipe Balbi , linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, Kalle Valo , "David S. Miller" , linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, Darren Hart , Andy Shevchenko , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, Zhang Rui , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, Len Brown , linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org, kbuild test robot , Nick Hu , Greentime Hu , Vincent Chen , Guo Ren , linux-csky@vger.kernel.org, Brian Cain , linux-hexagon@vger.kernel.org, Tony Luck , Fenghua Yu , linux-ia64@vger.kernel.org, Michal Simek , Michael Ellerman , Arnd Bergmann , Geoff Levand , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, "Paul E . McKenney" , Jonathan Corbet , Randy Dunlap , Davidlohr Bueso Subject: [patch V3 14/20] timekeeping: Split jiffies seqlock References: <20200321112544.878032781@linutronix.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-transfer-encoding: 8-bit X-Linutronix-Spam-Score: -1.0 X-Linutronix-Spam-Level: - X-Linutronix-Spam-Status: No , -1.0 points, 5.0 required, ALL_TRUSTED=-1, SHORTCIRCUIT=-0.0001 Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org From: Thomas Gleixner seqlock consists of a sequence counter and a spinlock_t which is used to serialize the writers. spinlock_t is substituted by a "sleeping" spinlock on PREEMPT_RT enabled kernels which breaks the usage in the timekeeping code as the writers are executed in hard interrupt and therefore non-preemptible context even on PREEMPT_RT. The spinlock in seqlock cannot be unconditionally replaced by a raw_spinlock_t as many seqlock users have nesting spinlock sections or other code which is not suitable to run in truly atomic context on RT. Instead of providing a raw_seqlock API for a single use case, open code the seqlock for the jiffies use case and implement it with a raw_spinlock_t and a sequence counter. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner --- kernel/time/jiffies.c | 7 ++++--- kernel/time/tick-common.c | 10 ++++++---- kernel/time/tick-sched.c | 19 ++++++++++++------- kernel/time/timekeeping.c | 6 ++++-- kernel/time/timekeeping.h | 3 ++- 5 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-) --- a/kernel/time/jiffies.c +++ b/kernel/time/jiffies.c @@ -58,7 +58,8 @@ static struct clocksource clocksource_ji .max_cycles = 10, }; -__cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_SEQLOCK(jiffies_lock); +__cacheline_aligned_in_smp DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(jiffies_lock); +__cacheline_aligned_in_smp seqcount_t jiffies_seq; #if (BITS_PER_LONG < 64) u64 get_jiffies_64(void) @@ -67,9 +68,9 @@ u64 get_jiffies_64(void) u64 ret; do { - seq = read_seqbegin(&jiffies_lock); + seq = read_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq); ret = jiffies_64; - } while (read_seqretry(&jiffies_lock, seq)); + } while (read_seqcount_retry(&jiffies_seq, seq)); return ret; } EXPORT_SYMBOL(get_jiffies_64); --- a/kernel/time/tick-common.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-common.c @@ -84,13 +84,15 @@ int tick_is_oneshot_available(void) static void tick_periodic(int cpu) { if (tick_do_timer_cpu == cpu) { - write_seqlock(&jiffies_lock); + raw_spin_lock(&jiffies_lock); + write_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq); /* Keep track of the next tick event */ tick_next_period = ktime_add(tick_next_period, tick_period); do_timer(1); - write_sequnlock(&jiffies_lock); + write_seqcount_end(&jiffies_seq); + raw_spin_unlock(&jiffies_lock); update_wall_time(); } @@ -162,9 +164,9 @@ void tick_setup_periodic(struct clock_ev ktime_t next; do { - seq = read_seqbegin(&jiffies_lock); + seq = read_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq); next = tick_next_period; - } while (read_seqretry(&jiffies_lock, seq)); + } while (read_seqcount_retry(&jiffies_seq, seq)); clockevents_switch_state(dev, CLOCK_EVT_STATE_ONESHOT); --- a/kernel/time/tick-sched.c +++ b/kernel/time/tick-sched.c @@ -65,7 +65,8 @@ static void tick_do_update_jiffies64(kti return; /* Reevaluate with jiffies_lock held */ - write_seqlock(&jiffies_lock); + raw_spin_lock(&jiffies_lock); + write_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq); delta = ktime_sub(now, last_jiffies_update); if (delta >= tick_period) { @@ -91,10 +92,12 @@ static void tick_do_update_jiffies64(kti /* Keep the tick_next_period variable up to date */ tick_next_period = ktime_add(last_jiffies_update, tick_period); } else { - write_sequnlock(&jiffies_lock); + write_seqcount_end(&jiffies_seq); + raw_spin_unlock(&jiffies_lock); return; } - write_sequnlock(&jiffies_lock); + write_seqcount_end(&jiffies_seq); + raw_spin_unlock(&jiffies_lock); update_wall_time(); } @@ -105,12 +108,14 @@ static ktime_t tick_init_jiffy_update(vo { ktime_t period; - write_seqlock(&jiffies_lock); + raw_spin_lock(&jiffies_lock); + write_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq); /* Did we start the jiffies update yet ? */ if (last_jiffies_update == 0) last_jiffies_update = tick_next_period; period = last_jiffies_update; - write_sequnlock(&jiffies_lock); + write_seqcount_end(&jiffies_seq); + raw_spin_unlock(&jiffies_lock); return period; } @@ -676,10 +681,10 @@ static ktime_t tick_nohz_next_event(stru /* Read jiffies and the time when jiffies were updated last */ do { - seq = read_seqbegin(&jiffies_lock); + seq = read_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq); basemono = last_jiffies_update; basejiff = jiffies; - } while (read_seqretry(&jiffies_lock, seq)); + } while (read_seqcount_retry(&jiffies_seq, seq)); ts->last_jiffies = basejiff; ts->timer_expires_base = basemono; --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.c +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.c @@ -2397,8 +2397,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(hardpps); */ void xtime_update(unsigned long ticks) { - write_seqlock(&jiffies_lock); + raw_spin_lock(&jiffies_lock); + write_seqcount_begin(&jiffies_seq); do_timer(ticks); - write_sequnlock(&jiffies_lock); + write_seqcount_end(&jiffies_seq); + raw_spin_unlock(&jiffies_lock); update_wall_time(); } --- a/kernel/time/timekeeping.h +++ b/kernel/time/timekeeping.h @@ -25,7 +25,8 @@ static inline void sched_clock_resume(vo extern void do_timer(unsigned long ticks); extern void update_wall_time(void); -extern seqlock_t jiffies_lock; +extern raw_spinlock_t jiffies_lock; +extern seqcount_t jiffies_seq; #define CS_NAME_LEN 32