From patchwork Wed Nov 29 11:08:32 2023 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Patchwork-Submitter: Lukasz Luba X-Patchwork-Id: 748426 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=none Received: from foss.arm.com (foss.arm.com [217.140.110.172]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7531810F0; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 03:08:07 -0800 (PST) Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 667552F4; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 03:08:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from e129166.arm.com (unknown [10.57.4.241]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id C95F03F5A1; Wed, 29 Nov 2023 03:08:04 -0800 (PST) From: Lukasz Luba To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org Cc: lukasz.luba@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, amit.kucheria@verdurent.com, amit.kachhap@gmail.com, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, len.brown@intel.com, pavel@ucw.cz, mhiramat@kernel.org, qyousef@layalina.io, wvw@google.com Subject: [PATCH v5 02/23] PM: EM: Refactor em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies() arguments Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2023 11:08:32 +0000 Message-Id: <20231129110853.94344-3-lukasz.luba@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.25.1 In-Reply-To: <20231129110853.94344-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com> References: <20231129110853.94344-1-lukasz.luba@arm.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 In order to prepare the code for the modifiable EM perf_state table, refactor existing function em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(). Signed-off-by: Lukasz Luba --- kernel/power/energy_model.c | 8 +++----- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/power/energy_model.c b/kernel/power/energy_model.c index 8b9dd4a39f63..42486674b834 100644 --- a/kernel/power/energy_model.c +++ b/kernel/power/energy_model.c @@ -237,10 +237,10 @@ static int em_create_pd(struct device *dev, int nr_states, return 0; } -static void em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(struct device *dev) +static void +em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(struct device *dev, struct em_perf_state *table) { struct em_perf_domain *pd = dev->em_pd; - struct em_perf_state *table; struct cpufreq_policy *policy; int found = 0; int i; @@ -254,8 +254,6 @@ static void em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(struct device *dev) return; } - table = pd->table; - for (i = 0; i < pd->nr_perf_states; i++) { if (!(table[i].flags & EM_PERF_STATE_INEFFICIENT)) continue; @@ -397,7 +395,7 @@ int em_dev_register_perf_domain(struct device *dev, unsigned int nr_states, dev->em_pd->flags |= flags; - em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(dev); + em_cpufreq_update_efficiencies(dev, dev->em_pd->table); em_debug_create_pd(dev); dev_info(dev, "EM: created perf domain\n");