Message ID | 20210802090232.1166195-1-damien.lemoal@wdc.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | libata cleanups and improvements | expand |
On 2021/08/03 1:00, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 8/2/21 2:02 AM, Damien Le Moal wrote: >> +/** >> + * sas_ncq_prio_supported_show - Indicate if device supports NCQ priority >> + * @dev: pointer to embedded device >> + * @attr: sas_ncq_prio_supported attribute desciptor >> + * @buf: the buffer returned >> + * >> + * A sysfs 'read/write' sdev attribute, only works with SATA >> + */ >> +static ssize_t >> +sas_ncq_prio_supported_show(struct device *dev, >> + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) >> +{ >> + struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev); >> + >> + return snprintf(buf, PAGE_SIZE, "%d\n", >> + scsih_ncq_prio_supp(sdev)); >> +} >> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(sas_ncq_prio_supported); > > Since this is new code, how about using sysfs_emit() instead of snprintf()? OK. Will do. > > Thanks, > > Bart. >
On 02/08/2021 11:03, Damien Le Moal wrote: > +/** > + * sas_ncq_prio_supported_show - Indicate if device supports NCQ priority > + * @dev: pointer to embedded device > + * @attr: sas_ncq_prio_supported attribute desciptor > + * @buf: the buffer returned > + * > + * A sysfs 'read/write' sdev attribute, only works with SATA > + */ [...] > +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(sas_ncq_prio_supported); > + Shouldn't that comment read: "A sysfs 'read only' sdev attribute, only works with SATA"
On 2021/08/03 16:55, Johannes Thumshirn wrote: > On 02/08/2021 11:03, Damien Le Moal wrote: >> +/** >> + * sas_ncq_prio_supported_show - Indicate if device supports NCQ priority >> + * @dev: pointer to embedded device >> + * @attr: sas_ncq_prio_supported attribute desciptor >> + * @buf: the buffer returned >> + * >> + * A sysfs 'read/write' sdev attribute, only works with SATA >> + */ > > [...] > >> +static DEVICE_ATTR_RO(sas_ncq_prio_supported); >> + > > Shouldn't that comment read: > "A sysfs 'read only' sdev attribute, only works with SATA" Oops. Indeed it should :)