mbox series

[0/2] Fix the NEC stop bug workaround

Message ID 20241014210840.5941d336@foxbook
Headers show
Series Fix the NEC stop bug workaround | expand

Message

Michal Pecio Oct. 14, 2024, 7:08 p.m. UTC
Hi,

I found an unfortunate problem with my workaround for this hardware bug.

To recap, Stop Endpoint sometimes fails, the Endpoint Context says the
EP is Stopped, but cancelled TRBs are still executed. I found this bug
earlier this year and submitted a workaround, which retries the command
(sometimes a few times) and all is good.

This works fine for common cases, but what if the endpoint is really
stopped? Then Stop Endpoint is supposed to fail and fail it does. The
workaround code doesn't know that it happened and retries infinitely.

I have never seen it in normal use, but I devised a reliable repro.
The effect isn't pretty - no URBs can be cancelled, device gets stuck,
if unplugged it locks up connections/disconnections on the whole bus.

With some experimentation I found that the bug is a variant of the old
"stop after restart" issue - the doorbell ring is internally reordered
after the subsequent command. By busy-waiting I confirmed that EP state
which is initially seen as Stopped becomes Running some time later.

I came up with a few ways to deal with it, this patch implements #3
which I think is the lowest risk. But for completeness:

0. Do nothing, revert the old patch. Not great, we are back to those
races and DMA-after-free. Seems particularly dangereous on Int IN EPs,
which may take a few ms to start - plenty of time to reuse URB buffers.

1. Ring the doorbell before queuing another Stop Endpoint. This ensures
that the EP will restart even if it wasn't meant to yet. Then a retry
succeeds and we are done. Super-simple and seems to work 100% reliably,
but what if there are still more gotchas in this hardware?

2. Set a flag on doorbell ring, clear on Stop EP or Halt. Look at the
flag to decide if it's the bug or a legitimately stopped EP. But I
didn't like adding overhead to DB ring, even if almost unmeasurable.

3. Set a flag when we know that the command will fail. This appears to
actually be doable. Then we just look at the flag and retry only if it
wasn't supposed to fail.

And some further ideas, considered but not implemented yet:

4. If we know that the command will fail, don't queue it at all. Other
commands are pending in those cases, so modify their handlers to do
our work for us. A little more invasive than the simple fixes 1-3.

5. Maybe it would make sense to ensure that the command can't ever
retry infinitely. Just give up and call hc_died() after 5 seconds.

Regards,
Michal

Comments

Greg KH Oct. 15, 2024, 10:38 a.m. UTC | #1
On Mon, Oct 14, 2024 at 09:10:05PM +0200, Michal Pecio wrote:
> The NEC uPD720200 has a bug, which prevents reliably stopping
> an endpoint shortly after it has been restarted. This usually
> happens when a driver kills many URBs in quick succession and
> it results in concurrent execution and cancellation of TDs.
> 
> This is handled by stopping the endpoint again if in doubt.
> 
> This "doubt" turns out to be a problem, because Stop Endpoint
> may be queued when the EP is already Stopped (for Set TR Deq
> execution, for example) or becomes Stopped concurrently (by
> Reset Endpoint, for example). If the EP is truly Stopped, the
> command fails and further retries just keep failing forever.
> 
> This is easily triggered by modifying uvcvideo to unlink its
> isochronous URBs in 100us intervals instead of poisoning them.
> Any driver that unlinks URBs asynchronously may trigger this,
> and any URB unlink during ongoing halt recovery also can.
> 
> Fix the problem by tracking redundant Stop Endpoint commands
> which are sure to fail, and by not retrying them. It's easy,
> because xhci_urb_dequeue() is the only user ever queuing the
> command with the default handler and without ensuring that
> the endpoint is Running and will not Halt before it Stops.
> For this case, we assume that an endpoint with pending URBs
> is always Running, unless certain operations are pending on
> it which indicate known exceptions.
> 
> Note that we need to catch those exceptions when they occur,
> because their flags may be cleared before our handler runs.
> 
> It's possible that other HCs have similar bugs (see also the
> related "Running" case below), but the workaround is limited
> to NEC because no such chips are currently known and tested.
> 
> Fixes: fd9d55d190c0 ("xhci: retry Stop Endpoint on buggy NEC controllers")
> Signed-off-by: Michal Pecio <michal.pecio@gmail.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/usb/host/xhci.h      |  2 ++
>  2 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 

Hi,

This is the friendly patch-bot of Greg Kroah-Hartman.  You have sent him
a patch that has triggered this response.  He used to manually respond
to these common problems, but in order to save his sanity (he kept
writing the same thing over and over, yet to different people), I was
created.  Hopefully you will not take offence and will fix the problem
in your patch and resubmit it so that it can be accepted into the Linux
kernel tree.

You are receiving this message because of the following common error(s)
as indicated below:

- You have marked a patch with a "Fixes:" tag for a commit that is in an
  older released kernel, yet you do not have a cc: stable line in the
  signed-off-by area at all, which means that the patch will not be
  applied to any older kernel releases.  To properly fix this, please
  follow the documented rules in the
  Documentation/process/stable-kernel-rules.rst file for how to resolve
  this.

If you wish to discuss this problem further, or you have questions about
how to resolve this issue, please feel free to respond to this email and
Greg will reply once he has dug out from the pending patches received
from other developers.

thanks,

greg k-h's patch email bot
Mathias Nyman Oct. 15, 2024, 12:23 p.m. UTC | #2
On 14.10.2024 22.08, Michal Pecio wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I found an unfortunate problem with my workaround for this hardware bug.
> 
> To recap, Stop Endpoint sometimes fails, the Endpoint Context says the
> EP is Stopped, but cancelled TRBs are still executed. I found this bug
> earlier this year and submitted a workaround, which retries the command
> (sometimes a few times) and all is good.
> 
> This works fine for common cases, but what if the endpoint is really
> stopped? Then Stop Endpoint is supposed to fail and fail it does. The
> workaround code doesn't know that it happened and retries infinitely.
> 
> I have never seen it in normal use, but I devised a reliable repro.
> The effect isn't pretty - no URBs can be cancelled, device gets stuck,
> if unplugged it locks up connections/disconnections on the whole bus.
> 
> With some experimentation I found that the bug is a variant of the old
> "stop after restart" issue - the doorbell ring is internally reordered
> after the subsequent command. By busy-waiting I confirmed that EP state
> which is initially seen as Stopped becomes Running some time later.
> 

Seems host controllers aren't designed to stop, move dequeue, and restart
an endpoint in quick succession.

In addition to fixing this NEC case we could think about avoiding these
cases, some could be avoided by adding a new ".flush_endpoint()" callback to
the USB host side API. Usb core itself has a usb_hcd_flush_endpoint() function
that calls .urb_dequeue() in a loop for each queued URB, causing host to
issue the stop, move deq and ring doorbell for every URB.

If usbcore knows all URBs will be cancelled it could let host do it in one go.
i.e. stop endpoint once.

Thanks
Mathias
Michal Pecio Oct. 15, 2024, 1:27 p.m. UTC | #3
> Can we skip the new flag and just check for the correct flags here
> directly?
> 
> if (ep->ep_state & (SET_DEQ_PENDING | EP_HALTED | EP_CLEARING_TT)
> 	break;

Unfortunately not, because those pending operations may (and usually
will) complete before our handler runs. They will not restart the EP
because we set EP_STOP_CMD_PENDING, but they will clear their flags.
So we know that Stop Endpoint is guaranteed to fail, but its handler
will not see those flags and will have no clue why it failed, hence
we store this one bit of knowledge specially for its use.

But you raise a valid point. If Stop EP fails on a Halted endpoint and
somebody else resets it before Stop EP handler runs, the handler will
see EP_HALTED, because Reset EP handler must run later if the commands
were queued and executed in this order.

So if Stop EP handler tests for EP_HALTED, nobody needs to worry about
updating EP_STOP_CMD_REDUNDANT for us. The helper function can go out,
the patch is shorter, and the solution more robust against any changes
to halt recovery code that anyone might do. All that "redundant" logic
becomes concentrated in queue/handle _stop_endpoint() functions.

I think I will do a v2.


By the way, is this list of conditions complete? There are other flags
like GETTING_STREAMS or CLEAR_TOGGLE, but I'm under impression that they
are valid only with no queued URBs, so nothing can be cancelled then.

Regards,
Michal
Alan Stern Oct. 15, 2024, 2:51 p.m. UTC | #4
On Tue, Oct 15, 2024 at 03:23:23PM +0300, Mathias Nyman wrote:
> In addition to fixing this NEC case we could think about avoiding these
> cases, some could be avoided by adding a new ".flush_endpoint()" callback to
> the USB host side API. Usb core itself has a usb_hcd_flush_endpoint() function
> that calls .urb_dequeue() in a loop for each queued URB, causing host to
> issue the stop, move deq and ring doorbell for every URB.
> 
> If usbcore knows all URBs will be cancelled it could let host do it in one go.
> i.e. stop endpoint once.

Indeed, this makes a lot of sense, and I have long thought that the
API should have been designed this way from the beginning.  At least
for non-Control transfers, unlinking a single URB somewhere inside a
sequence of URBs seems pointless.  I doubt that it ever happens in the
kernel.

(On the other hand, it _is_ reasonable to do this for Control
transfers, because they can come from several different sources, not
just from the device's driver.  The source for a Control URB might
want to unlink it while not affecting the URBs from other sources.)

Furthermore, I suspect this is what Windows does and what the USBIF
originally had in mind for URB management.  (It's harder to tell what
they thought about Control transfers, though.)

Alan Stern
Michal Pecio Oct. 16, 2024, 5:47 a.m. UTC | #5
> > With some experimentation I found that the bug is a variant of the
> > old "stop after restart" issue - the doorbell ring is internally
> > reordered after the subsequent command. By busy-waiting I confirmed
> > that EP state which is initially seen as Stopped becomes Running
> > some time later. 
> 
> Seems host controllers aren't designed to stop, move dequeue, and
> restart an endpoint in quick succession.

As it was you who added the Running case handling, do you know hardware
other than NEC which triggers this? Or could it be just a single vendor
who screwed up once 15 years ago and caused all the chaos?

NEC sometimes triggers the Running case too and it is obvious why. I'm
not sure how I missed it back in January and assumed it's some sort of
random failure for no reason.

BTW, the NEC problem appears to be limited to periodic endpoints. I am
unable to reproduce it on bulk. I thought that I reproduced it on bulk
back then, but on second thought it may have been interrupt, which that
device also has. Unfortunatel I wasn't printing endpoint numbers then.

Regards,
Michal
Mathias Nyman Oct. 24, 2024, 3:29 p.m. UTC | #6
On 16.10.2024 8.47, MichaƂ Pecio wrote:
>>> With some experimentation I found that the bug is a variant of the
>>> old "stop after restart" issue - the doorbell ring is internally
>>> reordered after the subsequent command. By busy-waiting I confirmed
>>> that EP state which is initially seen as Stopped becomes Running
>>> some time later.
>>
>> Seems host controllers aren't designed to stop, move dequeue, and
>> restart an endpoint in quick succession.
> 
> As it was you who added the Running case handling, do you know hardware
> other than NEC which triggers this? Or could it be just a single vendor
> who screwed up once 15 years ago and caused all the chaos?
> 
> NEC sometimes triggers the Running case too and it is obvious why. I'm
> not sure how I missed it back in January and assumed it's some sort of
> random failure for no reason.
> 
> BTW, the NEC problem appears to be limited to periodic endpoints. I am
> unable to reproduce it on bulk. I thought that I reproduced it on bulk
> back then, but on second thought it may have been interrupt, which that
> device also has. Unfortunatel I wasn't printing endpoint numbers then.
> 
> Regards,
> Michal

Sorry about the reply delay.
I don't think this is a NEC only issue.

I was originally fixing halted endpoints at stop endpoint command completion,
did some stress testing, and was able to hit that running case on Intel
xHC controllers

See:
9ebf30007858 xhci: Fix halted endpoint at stop endpoint command completion
1174d44906d5 xhci: handle stop endpoint command completion with endpoint in running state.

I also just got a report off-list about an exactly similar case as yours, endpoint
stopped with ctx error, endpoint state was still stopped even if doorbell was
already rung.

This caused Set TR Deq command to fail with context error as endpoint was running
by the time this command was processed.

This was on a Intel host, se we need a generic solution to this.

Thanks
-Mathias