Message ID | 20250304095315.3050325-1-quic_surapk@quicinc.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | wifi: ath12k: Pass correct channel frequency parameters | expand |
On 3/4/2025 1:53 AM, Suraj P Kizhakkethil wrote: > For higher bandwidths, the channel frequency parameters passed to > the firmware are incorrect. Pass correct values of channel > frequency parameters. > > v2: > - Replaced arg->band_center_freq1 to local variable center_freq1, > which is initialized to arg->band_center_freq1 > - Rebased on ToT > > Sriram R (1): > wifi: ath12k: Pass correct values of center freq1 and center freq2 for > 320 MHz > > Suraj P Kizhakkethil (1): > wifi: ath12k: Pass correct values of center freq1 and center freq2 for > 160 MHz > > drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/wmi.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++--- > 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > > base-commit: 3148fc3cf193dbbd2e14eee59468a510a38bf604 Some reminders: 1) per new guidance you should have added the destination tree name (ath-next) as a patch tag, i.e.: [PATCH ath-next v2 0/2] 2) since these were trivial changes you should have propagated the Reviewed-by: tags that were given for the v1 patches. No need to resend for this, but please keep in mind for future reference. /jeff
On 04-Mar-25 10:42 PM, Jeff Johnson wrote: > On 3/4/2025 1:53 AM, Suraj P Kizhakkethil wrote: >> For higher bandwidths, the channel frequency parameters passed to >> the firmware are incorrect. Pass correct values of channel >> frequency parameters. >> >> v2: >> - Replaced arg->band_center_freq1 to local variable center_freq1, >> which is initialized to arg->band_center_freq1 >> - Rebased on ToT >> >> Sriram R (1): >> wifi: ath12k: Pass correct values of center freq1 and center freq2 for >> 320 MHz >> >> Suraj P Kizhakkethil (1): >> wifi: ath12k: Pass correct values of center freq1 and center freq2 for >> 160 MHz >> >> drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath12k/wmi.c | 24 +++++++++++++++++++++--- >> 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> >> base-commit: 3148fc3cf193dbbd2e14eee59468a510a38bf604 > Some reminders: > 1) per new guidance you should have added the destination tree name (ath-next) > as a patch tag, i.e.: [PATCH ath-next v2 0/2] > 2) since these were trivial changes you should have propagated the > Reviewed-by: tags that were given for the v1 patches. > > No need to resend for this, but please keep in mind for future reference. > > /jeff Sure Jeff, I'll ensure to follow these guidance in the future Thanks