Message ID | 1516206496-16612-1-git-send-email-yamada.masahiro@socionext.com |
---|---|
Headers | show |
Series | mmc: tmio: another batch of TMIO MMC fixes and cleanups | expand |
On 14 February 2018 at 10:43, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote: > Hi Ulf, > > > 2018-02-14 18:36 GMT+09:00 Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@linaro.org>: >> On 7 February 2018 at 20:11, Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de> wrote: >>> >>>> I picked patch5 and patch6, as those seemed trivial. Unless there is a >>>> rc9, let's aim for 4.17 for the rest. >>> >>> I can't find the branch where you picked these patches? I wanted to use >>> it to apply the rest of the patches. They don't seem to fit on v4.15 >>> or current linus/master. Can you share this branch? >> >> You need to check again. :-) >> >> Patches up and to patch6 is already in Linus' tree v.16rc1, those I >> carried for quite a while on my next branch before sending them in the >> PR to Linus. >> >>> >>> I will do reviewing now "visually". But please wait until I tested them >>> before applying. >> >> I am eager to apply those patches you already have reviewed (to >> patch14), as those mostly seemed rather trivial and should be nice >> cleanups. >> >> Do you mind me going ahead, then you can continue and review/test the rest? >> > > > If you move forward, please fix-up the commit log of the patch 11. > (https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/10170007/) > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/tmio_mmc.txt > > -> > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mmc/mmc.txt Thanks for the reminder. Yes I can amend the patch, no worries. Kind regards Uffe
On 5 March 2018 at 10:34, Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@socionext.com> wrote: > Hi Ulf, Wolfram, > > 2018-03-05 18:22 GMT+09:00 Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>: >> >>> I have added Wolframs tags to the already applied patches and applied >>> that last two, 15 and 16. >> >> Thanks. Please note that patch 14 misses my Rev tag. (I gave it >> yesterday but the patch was accidently applied before. One round too >> early, so to say). Added rev. tag. >> >>> They are all present in my next branch. The fix that Wolfram sent on >>> top, is added immediately after the commit it fixes. >> >> Could we also squash it, then? >> > > If Wolfram is fine with squashing, > that would be cleaner. > Done. > In that case, can you add Tested-by > to patch 12? Done. Kind regards Uffe